Bitwarden
- Starting price
- $4/user/mo
- Reviews
- 4.6/5 (~600 G2 reviews)
- Free trial
- Free tier + 7 days
- Deployment
- Cloud + self-host
- Best for
- Budget-conscious and security-minded teams wanting open-source with a free tier
Best Password Manager (Business) · 2026
Bitwarden vs Dashlane: on our data-weighted scoring, Bitwarden edges ahead (8.6 vs 7.7/10). Bitwarden starts at $4/user/mo and is best for budget-conscious and security-minded teams wanting open-source with a free tier; Dashlane starts at $8/user/mo and is best for organizations wanting password management bundled with credential-risk monitoring. Choose Bitwarden for the stronger overall track record; consider Dashlane if its pricing model or fit matches your environment better. Side-by-side table below.
Affiliate disclosure: Some links may be affiliate or partner links. If you sign up through one, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. This never changes our scores or rankings. Learn more.
Six criteria, each scored 0–10 on the same scale from real review data, public pricing and feature coverage. See our methodology →
| Criterion | Bitwarden | Dashlane |
|---|---|---|
| Editorial | 8.6 | 7.7 |
| User reviews | 9.2 | 9.0 |
| Adoption | 7.4 | 6.4 |
| Affordability | 9.5 | 4.4 |
| Feature breadth | 6.0 | 6.0 |
| Ease of trial | 10.0 | 6.0 |
| Bitwarden | Dashlane | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $4/user/mo | $8/user/mo |
| Pricing model | per user | per user |
| Free trial / tier | Free tier + 7 days | 14 days |
| Best for | Budget-conscious and security-minded teams wanting open-source with a free tier | Organizations wanting password management bundled with credential-risk monitoring |
| Deployment | Cloud + self-host | Cloud |
| G2 rating | 4.6/5 (600) | 4.5/5 (250) |
| Capterra rating | — | — |
| Our score | 8.6 | 7.7 |
You need budget-conscious and security-minded teams wanting open-source with a free tier.
You need organizations wanting password management bundled with credential-risk monitoring.
| Plan | Bitwarden | Dashlane |
|---|---|---|
| Free Tier | Yes (individuals + 2-person org) | No |
| Starting Price | $4/user/mo (Teams, annual) | $8/user/mo (Business, annual) |
| Enterprise | $6/user/mo + SSO, policies, self-host | Custom pricing (Omnix Enterprise) |
| Free Trial | 7 days | 14 days |
Bitwarden undercuts Dashlane by 50% at entry level and includes a genuine free tier for individuals and small teams. Dashlane’s midtier Omnix ($11/user) bundles credential-risk monitoring, but you pay a premium for it.
Bitwarden spans cloud and self-hosted deployments, appealing to organizations wanting full control or air-gapped environments. Its open-source codebase enables independent auditing—a rare transparency advantage. The Secrets Manager add-on extends beyond passwords into secrets sprawl. SSO and SCIM arrive at the Teams tier ($4), with enterprise policies at the $6 tier. Passkey and passwordless support are present across tiers.
Dashlane Cloud-only, but compensates with differentiated credential-risk intelligence: dark-web monitoring, phishing detection (Omnix), and zero-knowledge Confidential SSO. SCIM and an admin console match Bitwarden’s business tier, but the stack feels oriented toward detecting compromise rather than preventing it. Passkeys are supported, though less emphasized.
| Platform | G2 Score | Reviews | Our Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bitwarden | 4.6/5 | 600+ | 8.6/10 |
| Dashlane | 4.5/5 | 250+ | 7.7/10 |
Bitwarden wins on value, transparency, and flexibility. At $4/user/month with open-source auditing and self-host options, it’s the rational choice for cost-conscious teams and those needing deployment control. The free tier is legitimately useful.
Dashlane makes sense if credential-risk monitoring is a priority. Its dark-web and phishing tooling justify the $8–11 price point for organizations that treat breach detection as essential. Confidential SSO also adds privacy credibility, but you sacrifice open-source accountability and deployment options.
Verdict: Choose Bitwarden for budget and autonomy; choose Dashlane for risk-centric threat intelligence bundled into one interface.