Arctic Wolf
8.5/10
MSP Compared score
- Starting price
- Custom quote
- Reviews
- 4.7/5 (~250 G2 reviews)
- Free trial
- —
- Deployment
- Cloud
- Best for
- Mid-market orgs wanting a named concierge security team
Best MDR / XDR Software · 2026
Arctic Wolf vs 
Huntress Arctic Wolf vs Huntress: on our data-weighted scoring, Huntress edges ahead (8.6 vs 7.8/10). Arctic Wolf starts at Custom quote and is best for mid-market orgs wanting a named concierge security team; Huntress starts at Custom quote and is best for msps and smbs wanting affordable managed detection with a real human soc. Choose Huntress for the stronger overall track record; consider Arctic Wolf if its pricing model or fit matches your environment better. Side-by-side table below.
Huntress
9.2/10
MSP Compared score
- Starting price
- Custom quote
- Reviews
- 4.9/5 (~700 G2 reviews)
- Free trial
- Free trial
- Deployment
- Cloud
- Best for
- MSPs and SMBs wanting affordable managed detection with a real human SOC
Affiliate links — vendors may pay us a commission. It never affects our data-driven ranking.
Strengths at a glance
Six criteria, each scored 0–10 on the same scale from real review data, public pricing and feature coverage. See our methodology →
| Criterion | Arctic Wolf | Huntress |
|---|---|---|
| Editorial | 7.8 | 8.6 |
| User reviews | 9.4 | 9.8 |
| Adoption | 6.4 | 7.5 |
| Affordability | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| Feature breadth | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| Ease of trial | 3.0 | 6.0 |
Arctic Wolf vs Huntress: head-to-head
| Arctic Wolf | Huntress | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Custom quote | Custom quote |
| Pricing model | quote | per endpoint |
| Free trial / tier | — | Free trial |
| Best for | Mid-market orgs wanting a named concierge security team | MSPs and SMBs wanting affordable managed detection with a real human SOC |
| Deployment | Cloud | Cloud |
| G2 rating | 4.7/5 (250) | 4.9/5 (700) |
| Capterra rating | — | — |
| Our score | 7.8 | 8.6 |
Choose Arctic Wolf if…
You need mid-market orgs wanting a named concierge security team.
Pros
- Dedicated concierge team
- Broad telemetry
- Strong outcomes
Cons
- Higher cost
- Quote/contract
- Less DIY control
Choose Huntress if…
You need msps and smbs wanting affordable managed detection with a real human soc.
Pros
- Outstanding SOC + support
- Built for MSPs/SMB
- Fast time-to-value
Cons
- Quote pricing
- Complements (not replaces) some AV
- Endpoint-count based
In depth
Pricing: Huntress vs Arctic Wolf
Huntress bills on a per endpoint model from Custom quote (yes trial), while Arctic Wolf uses a quote model from Custom quote. Because the models differ, the cheaper option flips depending on your fleet size — model both at your seat/endpoint count.
Features & deployment
Huntress ships 5 headline capabilities (Managed EDR with 24/7 SOC, Microsoft 365 ITDR, Security awareness training, Ransomware canaries) and deploys Cloud. Arctic Wolf ships 5 (MDR with concierge team, Managed risk/vuln, 24/7 SOC, Log retention), deploying Cloud.
Ratings & verdict
Huntress holds 4.9/5 (~700 G2 reviews); Arctic Wolf holds 4.7/5 (~250 G2 reviews). On our data-weighted score, Huntress edges ahead (8.6 vs 7.8/10). Pick Arctic Wolf instead when mid-market orgs wanting a named concierge security team. See Huntress alternatives or Arctic Wolf alternatives.
Frequently asked questions
- Arctic Wolf vs Huntress: which is better?
- Arctic Wolf vs Huntress: on our data-weighted scoring, Huntress edges ahead (8.6 vs 7.8/10). Arctic Wolf starts at Custom quote and is best for mid-market orgs wanting a named concierge security team; Huntress starts at Custom quote and is best for msps and smbs wanting affordable managed detection with a real human soc.
- Is Arctic Wolf cheaper than Huntress?
- Arctic Wolf starts at Custom quote and Huntress starts at Custom quote (see the pricing rows for models and limits).
Data as of June 16, 2026. Sources: arcticwolf.com, huntress.com. Figures are pulled from public vendor and security data and refreshed automatically.