Arctic Wolf
8.5/10
MSP Compared score
- Starting price
- Custom quote
- Reviews
- 4.7/5 (~250 G2 reviews)
- Free trial
- —
- Deployment
- Cloud
- Best for
- Mid-market orgs wanting a named concierge security team
Best MDR / XDR Software · 2026
Arctic Wolf vs 
Todyl Arctic Wolf vs Todyl: on our data-weighted scoring, Arctic Wolf edges ahead (7.8 vs 7.7/10). Arctic Wolf starts at Custom quote and is best for mid-market orgs wanting a named concierge security team; Todyl starts at Custom quote and is best for msps wanting a modular security platform (sase + edr + mdr). Choose Arctic Wolf for the stronger overall track record; consider Todyl if its pricing model or fit matches your environment better. Side-by-side table below.
Todyl
8.4/10
MSP Compared score
- Starting price
- Custom quote
- Reviews
- 4.8/5 (~60 G2 reviews)
- Free trial
- —
- Deployment
- Cloud
- Best for
- MSPs wanting a modular security platform (SASE + EDR + MDR)
Affiliate links — vendors may pay us a commission. It never affects our data-driven ranking.
Strengths at a glance
Six criteria, each scored 0–10 on the same scale from real review data, public pricing and feature coverage. See our methodology →
| Criterion | Arctic Wolf | Todyl |
|---|---|---|
| Editorial | 7.8 | 7.7 |
| User reviews | 9.4 | 9.6 |
| Adoption | 6.4 | 4.7 |
| Affordability | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| Feature breadth | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| Ease of trial | 3.0 | 3.0 |
Arctic Wolf vs Todyl: head-to-head
| Arctic Wolf | Todyl | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Custom quote | Custom quote |
| Pricing model | quote | quote |
| Free trial / tier | — | — |
| Best for | Mid-market orgs wanting a named concierge security team | MSPs wanting a modular security platform (SASE + EDR + MDR) |
| Deployment | Cloud | Cloud |
| G2 rating | 4.7/5 (250) | 4.8/5 (60) |
| Capterra rating | — | — |
| Our score | 7.8 | 7.7 |
Choose Arctic Wolf if…
You need mid-market orgs wanting a named concierge security team.
Pros
- Dedicated concierge team
- Broad telemetry
- Strong outcomes
Cons
- Higher cost
- Quote/contract
- Less DIY control
Choose Todyl if…
You need msps wanting a modular security platform (sase + edr + mdr).
Pros
- Consolidates many tools in one agent
- MSP-focused
- Flexible modules
Cons
- Quote pricing
- Breadth = learning curve
- Younger platform
In depth
Pricing: Arctic Wolf vs Todyl
Arctic Wolf bills on a quote model from Custom quote, while Todyl uses a quote model from Custom quote. Because the models differ, the cheaper option flips depending on your fleet size — model both at your seat/endpoint count.
Features & deployment
Arctic Wolf ships 5 headline capabilities (MDR with concierge team, Managed risk/vuln, 24/7 SOC, Log retention) and deploys Cloud. Todyl ships 5 (Single-agent platform, SASE/SSE networking, EDR + MXDR, SIEM), deploying Cloud.
Ratings & verdict
Arctic Wolf holds 4.7/5 (~250 G2 reviews); Todyl holds 4.8/5 (~60 G2 reviews). On our data-weighted score, Arctic Wolf edges ahead (7.8 vs 7.7/10). Pick Todyl instead when msps wanting a modular security platform (sase + edr + mdr). See Arctic Wolf alternatives or Todyl alternatives.
Frequently asked questions
- Arctic Wolf vs Todyl: which is better?
- Arctic Wolf vs Todyl: on our data-weighted scoring, Arctic Wolf edges ahead (7.8 vs 7.7/10). Arctic Wolf starts at Custom quote and is best for mid-market orgs wanting a named concierge security team; Todyl starts at Custom quote and is best for msps wanting a modular security platform (sase + edr + mdr).
- Is Arctic Wolf cheaper than Todyl?
- Arctic Wolf starts at Custom quote and Todyl starts at Custom quote (see the pricing rows for models and limits).
Data as of June 16, 2026. Sources: arcticwolf.com, todyl.com. Figures are pulled from public vendor and security data and refreshed automatically.