Auvik
8.2/10
MSP Compared score
- Starting price
- Custom quote
- Reviews
- 4.5/5 (~200 G2 reviews)
- Free trial
- 14 days
- Deployment
- Cloud
- Best for
- MSPs wanting automated network mapping + monitoring
Best Network Monitoring Software · 2026
Auvik vs 
Datadog Auvik vs Datadog: on our data-weighted scoring, Datadog edges ahead (8.4 vs 7.8/10). Auvik starts at Custom quote and is best for msps wanting automated network mapping + monitoring; Datadog starts at $5/host/mo and is best for cloud-native teams wanting unified network, infrastructure, and application observability as saas. Choose Datadog for the stronger overall track record; consider Auvik if its pricing model or fit matches your environment better. Side-by-side table below.
Datadog
8.7/10
MSP Compared score
- Starting price
- $5/host/mo
- Reviews
- 4.3/5 (~545 G2 reviews)
- Free trial
- Free tier + 14 days
- Deployment
- Cloud
- Best for
- Cloud-native teams wanting unified network, infrastructure, and application observability as SaaS
Affiliate links — vendors may pay us a commission. It never affects our data-driven ranking.
Strengths at a glance
Six criteria, each scored 0–10 on the same scale from real review data, public pricing and feature coverage. See our methodology →
| Criterion | Auvik | Datadog |
|---|---|---|
| Editorial | 7.8 | 8.4 |
| User reviews | 9.0 | 8.6 |
| Adoption | 6.1 | 7.2 |
| Affordability | 5.0 | 9.5 |
| Feature breadth | 5.0 | 6.0 |
| Ease of trial | 6.0 | 10.0 |
Auvik vs Datadog: head-to-head
| Auvik | Datadog | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Custom quote | $5/host/mo |
| Pricing model | quote | per device |
| Free trial / tier | 14 days | Free tier + 14 days |
| Best for | MSPs wanting automated network mapping + monitoring | Cloud-native teams wanting unified network, infrastructure, and application observability as SaaS |
| Deployment | Cloud | Cloud |
| G2 rating | 4.5/5 (200) | 4.3/5 (545) |
| Capterra rating | — | — |
| Our score | 7.8 | 8.4 |
Choose Auvik if…
You need msps wanting automated network mapping + monitoring.
Pros
- Automatic mapping
- Quick deployment
- Strong MSP fit
Cons
- Quote pricing (per network)
- Can get pricey
- Deep config trails dedicated NPM
Choose Datadog if…
You need cloud-native teams wanting unified network, infrastructure, and application observability as saas.
Pros
- Best-in-class unified observability
- Huge integration ecosystem
- SaaS — no infrastructure to run
Cons
- Costs add up across modules
- Usage-based billing can surprise
- Overkill for simple networks
In depth
Pricing: Datadog vs Auvik
Datadog bills on a per device model from $5/host/mo (free tier available), while Auvik uses a quote model from Custom quote (14 days trial). Because the models differ, the cheaper option flips depending on your fleet size — model both at your seat/endpoint count.
Features & deployment
Datadog ships 6 headline capabilities (Cloud Network Monitoring (flows), Network Device Monitoring (SNMP), Unified infra + APM + logs, 800+ integrations) and deploys Cloud. Auvik ships 5 (Auto network topology, SNMP monitoring, Config backup, Traffic insights), deploying Cloud.
Ratings & verdict
Datadog holds 4.3/5 (~545 G2 reviews); Auvik holds 4.5/5 (~200 G2 reviews). On our data-weighted score, Datadog edges ahead (8.4 vs 7.8/10). Pick Auvik instead when msps wanting automated network mapping + monitoring. See Datadog alternatives or Auvik alternatives.
Frequently asked questions
- Auvik vs Datadog: which is better?
- Auvik vs Datadog: on our data-weighted scoring, Datadog edges ahead (8.4 vs 7.8/10). Auvik starts at Custom quote and is best for msps wanting automated network mapping + monitoring; Datadog starts at $5/host/mo and is best for cloud-native teams wanting unified network, infrastructure, and application observability as saas.
- Is Auvik cheaper than Datadog?
- Auvik starts at Custom quote and Datadog starts at $5/host/mo (see the pricing rows for models and limits).
Data as of June 16, 2026. Sources: auvik.com, datadoghq.com. Figures are pulled from public vendor and security data and refreshed automatically.