Auvik
8.2/10
MSP Compared score
- Starting price
- Custom quote
- Reviews
- 4.5/5 (~200 G2 reviews)
- Free trial
- 14 days
- Deployment
- Cloud
- Best for
- MSPs wanting automated network mapping + monitoring
Best Network Monitoring Software · 2026
Auvik vs 
Domotz Auvik vs Domotz: on our data-weighted scoring, Auvik edges ahead (7.8 vs 7.8/10). Auvik starts at Custom quote and is best for msps wanting automated network mapping + monitoring; Domotz starts at $35/site/mo and is best for msps wanting affordable per-site network monitoring. Choose Auvik for the stronger overall track record; consider Domotz if its pricing model or fit matches your environment better. Side-by-side table below.
Domotz
8.1/10
MSP Compared score
- Starting price
- $35/site/mo
- Reviews
- 4.6/5 (~120 G2 reviews)
- Free trial
- 14 days
- Deployment
- Cloud + agent
- Best for
- MSPs wanting affordable per-site network monitoring
Affiliate links — vendors may pay us a commission. It never affects our data-driven ranking.
Strengths at a glance
Six criteria, each scored 0–10 on the same scale from real review data, public pricing and feature coverage. See our methodology →
| Criterion | Auvik | Domotz |
|---|---|---|
| Editorial | 7.8 | 7.8 |
| User reviews | 9.0 | 9.2 |
| Adoption | 6.1 | 5.5 |
| Affordability | 5.0 | 2.5 |
| Feature breadth | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| Ease of trial | 6.0 | 6.0 |
Auvik vs Domotz: head-to-head
| Auvik | Domotz | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Custom quote | $35/site/mo |
| Pricing model | quote | per site |
| Free trial / tier | 14 days | 14 days |
| Best for | MSPs wanting automated network mapping + monitoring | MSPs wanting affordable per-site network monitoring |
| Deployment | Cloud | Cloud + agent |
| G2 rating | 4.5/5 (200) | 4.6/5 (120) |
| Capterra rating | — | — |
| Our score | 7.8 | 7.8 |
Choose Auvik if…
You need msps wanting automated network mapping + monitoring.
Pros
- Automatic mapping
- Quick deployment
- Strong MSP fit
Cons
- Quote pricing (per network)
- Can get pricey
- Deep config trails dedicated NPM
Choose Domotz if…
You need msps wanting affordable per-site network monitoring.
Pros
- Flat per-site pricing
- Unlimited devices
- Easy setup
Cons
- Per-site model
- Less topology depth than Auvik
- Reporting basic
In depth
Pricing: Auvik vs Domotz
Auvik bills on a quote model from Custom quote (14 days trial), while Domotz uses a per site model from $35/site/mo (14 days trial). Because the models differ, the cheaper option flips depending on your fleet size — model both at your seat/endpoint count.
Features & deployment
Auvik ships 5 headline capabilities (Auto network topology, SNMP monitoring, Config backup, Traffic insights) and deploys Cloud. Domotz ships 5 (Network discovery + monitoring, Unlimited devices per site, Remote access, SNMP), deploying Cloud + agent.
Ratings & verdict
Auvik holds 4.5/5 (~200 G2 reviews); Domotz holds 4.6/5 (~120 G2 reviews). On our data-weighted score, Auvik edges ahead (7.8 vs 7.8/10). Pick Domotz instead when msps wanting affordable per-site network monitoring. See Auvik alternatives or Domotz alternatives.
Frequently asked questions
- Auvik vs Domotz: which is better?
- Auvik vs Domotz: on our data-weighted scoring, Auvik edges ahead (7.8 vs 7.8/10). Auvik starts at Custom quote and is best for msps wanting automated network mapping + monitoring; Domotz starts at $35/site/mo and is best for msps wanting affordable per-site network monitoring.
- Is Auvik cheaper than Domotz?
- Auvik starts at Custom quote and Domotz starts at $35/site/mo (see the pricing rows for models and limits).
Data as of June 16, 2026. Sources: auvik.com, domotz.com. Figures are pulled from public vendor and security data and refreshed automatically.