Auvik
8.2/10
MSP Compared score
- Starting price
- Custom quote
- Reviews
- 4.5/5 (~200 G2 reviews)
- Free trial
- 14 days
- Deployment
- Cloud
- Best for
- MSPs wanting automated network mapping + monitoring
Best Network Monitoring Software · 2026
Auvik vs 
PRTG Network Monitor Auvik vs PRTG Network Monitor: on our data-weighted scoring, PRTG Network Monitor edges ahead (8.0 vs 7.8/10). Auvik starts at Custom quote and is best for msps wanting automated network mapping + monitoring; PRTG Network Monitor starts at Free tier available and is best for teams wanting sensor-based monitoring with a free tier. Choose PRTG Network Monitor for the stronger overall track record; consider Auvik if its pricing model or fit matches your environment better. Side-by-side table below.
PRTG Network Monitor
8.0/10
MSP Compared score
- Starting price
- Free tier available
- Reviews
- 4.6/5 (~250 G2 reviews)
- Free trial
- Free tier + 30 days
- Deployment
- On-prem + cloud
- Best for
- Teams wanting sensor-based monitoring with a free tier
Affiliate links — vendors may pay us a commission. It never affects our data-driven ranking.
Strengths at a glance
Six criteria, each scored 0–10 on the same scale from real review data, public pricing and feature coverage. See our methodology →
| Criterion | Auvik | PRTG Network Monitor |
|---|---|---|
| Editorial | 7.8 | 8.0 |
| User reviews | 9.0 | 9.2 |
| Adoption | 6.1 | 6.4 |
| Affordability | 5.0 | 9.5 |
| Feature breadth | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| Ease of trial | 6.0 | 10.0 |
Auvik vs PRTG Network Monitor: head-to-head
| Auvik | PRTG Network Monitor | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Custom quote | Free tier available |
| Pricing model | quote | per sensor |
| Free trial / tier | 14 days | Free tier + 30 days |
| Best for | MSPs wanting automated network mapping + monitoring | Teams wanting sensor-based monitoring with a free tier |
| Deployment | Cloud | On-prem + cloud |
| G2 rating | 4.5/5 (200) | 4.6/5 (250) |
| Capterra rating | — | — |
| Our score | 7.8 | 8.0 |
Choose Auvik if…
You need msps wanting automated network mapping + monitoring.
Pros
- Automatic mapping
- Quick deployment
- Strong MSP fit
Cons
- Quote pricing (per network)
- Can get pricey
- Deep config trails dedicated NPM
Choose PRTG Network Monitor if…
You need teams wanting sensor-based monitoring with a free tier.
Pros
- Free up to 100 sensors
- Mature and flexible
- Broad protocol support
Cons
- Sensor model can get costly
- On-prem core
- Dated UI
In depth
Pricing: PRTG Network Monitor vs Auvik
PRTG Network Monitor bills on a per sensor model from Free tier available (free tier available), while Auvik uses a quote model from Custom quote (14 days trial). Because the models differ, the cheaper option flips depending on your fleet size — model both at your seat/endpoint count.
Features & deployment
PRTG Network Monitor ships 5 headline capabilities (Sensor-based monitoring, SNMP/flow/packet, Custom dashboards, Alerting) and deploys On-prem + cloud. Auvik ships 5 (Auto network topology, SNMP monitoring, Config backup, Traffic insights), deploying Cloud.
Ratings & verdict
PRTG Network Monitor holds 4.6/5 (~250 G2 reviews); Auvik holds 4.5/5 (~200 G2 reviews). On our data-weighted score, PRTG Network Monitor edges ahead (8.0 vs 7.8/10). Pick Auvik instead when msps wanting automated network mapping + monitoring. See PRTG Network Monitor alternatives or Auvik alternatives.
Frequently asked questions
- Auvik vs PRTG Network Monitor: which is better?
- Auvik vs PRTG Network Monitor: on our data-weighted scoring, PRTG Network Monitor edges ahead (8.0 vs 7.8/10). Auvik starts at Custom quote and is best for msps wanting automated network mapping + monitoring; PRTG Network Monitor starts at Free tier available and is best for teams wanting sensor-based monitoring with a free tier.
- Is Auvik cheaper than PRTG Network Monitor?
- Auvik starts at Custom quote and PRTG Network Monitor starts at Free tier available (see the pricing rows for models and limits).
Data as of June 16, 2026. Sources: auvik.com, paessler.com. Figures are pulled from public vendor and security data and refreshed automatically.