Auvik
8.2/10
MSP Compared score
- Starting price
- Custom quote
- Reviews
- 4.5/5 (~200 G2 reviews)
- Free trial
- 14 days
- Deployment
- Cloud
- Best for
- MSPs wanting automated network mapping + monitoring
Best Network Monitoring Software · 2026
Auvik vs 
Zabbix Auvik vs Zabbix: on our data-weighted scoring, Zabbix edges ahead (8.1 vs 7.8/10). Auvik starts at Custom quote and is best for msps wanting automated network mapping + monitoring; Zabbix starts at Free tier available and is best for budget-conscious teams wanting a fully free, open-source, highly scalable monitoring platform. Choose Zabbix for the stronger overall track record; consider Auvik if its pricing model or fit matches your environment better. Side-by-side table below.
Zabbix
8.3/10
MSP Compared score
- Starting price
- Free tier available
- Reviews
- 4.3/5 (~192 G2 reviews)
- Free trial
- Free tier + free trial
- Deployment
- Cloud + self-host
- Best for
- Budget-conscious teams wanting a fully free, open-source, highly scalable monitoring platform
Affiliate links — vendors may pay us a commission. It never affects our data-driven ranking.
Strengths at a glance
Six criteria, each scored 0–10 on the same scale from real review data, public pricing and feature coverage. See our methodology →
| Criterion | Auvik | Zabbix |
|---|---|---|
| Editorial | 7.8 | 8.1 |
| User reviews | 9.0 | 8.6 |
| Adoption | 6.1 | 6.0 |
| Affordability | 5.0 | 9.5 |
| Feature breadth | 5.0 | 6.0 |
| Ease of trial | 6.0 | 10.0 |
Auvik vs Zabbix: head-to-head
| Auvik | Zabbix | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Custom quote | Free tier available |
| Pricing model | quote | flat |
| Free trial / tier | 14 days | Free tier + free trial |
| Best for | MSPs wanting automated network mapping + monitoring | Budget-conscious teams wanting a fully free, open-source, highly scalable monitoring platform |
| Deployment | Cloud | Cloud + self-host |
| G2 rating | 4.5/5 (200) | 4.3/5 (192) |
| Capterra rating | — | — |
| Our score | 7.8 | 8.1 |
Choose Auvik if…
You need msps wanting automated network mapping + monitoring.
Pros
- Automatic mapping
- Quick deployment
- Strong MSP fit
Cons
- Quote pricing (per network)
- Can get pricey
- Deep config trails dedicated NPM
Choose Zabbix if…
You need budget-conscious teams wanting a fully free, open-source, highly scalable monitoring platform.
Pros
- Completely free core software
- Extremely scalable + flexible
- No vendor lock-in
Cons
- Steeper setup + learning curve
- Support costs extra (or DIY)
- UI less polished than SaaS rivals
In depth
Pricing: Zabbix vs Auvik
Zabbix bills on a flat model from Free tier available (free tier available), while Auvik uses a quote model from Custom quote (14 days trial). Because the models differ, the cheaper option flips depending on your fleet size — model both at your seat/endpoint count.
Features & deployment
Zabbix ships 6 headline capabilities (Free + open-source (no license fees), Agent + agentless collection, 250+ official templates, Distributed + high-availability monitoring) and deploys Cloud + self-host. Auvik ships 5 (Auto network topology, SNMP monitoring, Config backup, Traffic insights), deploying Cloud.
Ratings & verdict
Zabbix holds 4.3/5 (~192 G2 reviews); Auvik holds 4.5/5 (~200 G2 reviews). On our data-weighted score, Zabbix edges ahead (8.1 vs 7.8/10). Pick Auvik instead when msps wanting automated network mapping + monitoring. See Zabbix alternatives or Auvik alternatives.
Frequently asked questions
- Auvik vs Zabbix: which is better?
- Auvik vs Zabbix: on our data-weighted scoring, Zabbix edges ahead (8.1 vs 7.8/10). Auvik starts at Custom quote and is best for msps wanting automated network mapping + monitoring; Zabbix starts at Free tier available and is best for budget-conscious teams wanting a fully free, open-source, highly scalable monitoring platform.
- Is Auvik cheaper than Zabbix?
- Auvik starts at Custom quote and Zabbix starts at Free tier available (see the pricing rows for models and limits).
Data as of June 16, 2026. Sources: auvik.com, zabbix.com. Figures are pulled from public vendor and security data and refreshed automatically.