Cato Networks
- Starting price
- Custom quote
- Reviews
- 4.4/5 (G2)
- Free trial
- —
- Deployment
- Cloud
- Best for
- Site-heavy organizations wanting converged SASE (SD-WAN + security + ZTNA) on one platform
Best ZTNA / Business VPN · 2026
Cato Networks vs GoodAccess: on our data-weighted scoring, GoodAccess edges ahead (8.0 vs 7.7/10). Cato Networks starts at Custom quote and is best for site-heavy organizations wanting converged SASE (SD-WAN + security + ZTNA) on one platform; GoodAccess starts at $7/user/mo and is best for small businesses wanting an affordable dedicated cloud VPN with a path to full zero trust. Choose GoodAccess for the stronger overall track record; consider Cato Networks if its pricing model or fit matches your environment better. Side-by-side table below.
Affiliate disclosure: Some links may be affiliate or partner links. If you sign up through one, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. This never changes our scores or rankings. Learn more.
Six criteria, each scored 0–10 on the same scale from real review data, public pricing and feature coverage. See our methodology →
| Criterion | Cato Networks | GoodAccess |
|---|---|---|
| Editorial | 7.7 | 8.0 |
| User reviews | 8.8 | 9.4 |
| Adoption | 0.0 | 5.8 |
| Affordability | 5.0 | 5.1 |
| Feature breadth | 6.0 | 6.0 |
| Ease of trial | 3.0 | 6.0 |
| Cato Networks | GoodAccess | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Custom quote | $7/user/mo |
| Pricing model | quote | per user |
| Free trial / tier | — | 14 days |
| Best for | Site-heavy organizations wanting converged SASE (SD-WAN + security + ZTNA) on one platform | Small businesses wanting an affordable dedicated cloud VPN with a path to full zero trust |
| Deployment | Cloud | Cloud |
| G2 rating | 4.4/5 | 4.7/5 (150) |
| Capterra rating | — | — |
| Our score | 7.7 | 8.0 |
You need site-heavy organizations wanting converged sase (sd-wan + security + ztna) on one platform.
You need small businesses wanting an affordable dedicated cloud vpn with a path to full zero trust.
GoodAccess bills on a per user model from $7/user/mo (14 days trial), while Cato Networks uses a quote model from Custom quote (no trial). Because the models differ, the cheaper option flips depending on your fleet size — model both at your seat/endpoint count.
GoodAccess ships 6 headline capabilities (Dedicated cloud VPN + static IP, Zero-trust access (SSE/SDP), Split tunneling + DNS filtering, Threat blocker) and deploys Cloud. Cato Networks ships 6 (Converged SASE (SD-WAN + SSE), Single management console, Native ZTNA + CASB + DLP, Global private backbone (PoPs)), deploying Cloud.
GoodAccess holds 4.7/5 (~150 G2 reviews); Cato Networks holds 4.4/5 (G2). On our data-weighted score, GoodAccess edges ahead (8.0 vs 7.7/10). Pick Cato Networks instead when site-heavy organizations wanting converged sase (sd-wan + security + ztna) on one platform. See GoodAccess alternatives or Cato Networks alternatives.