Cato Networks
7.7/10
MSP Compared score
- Starting price
- Custom quote
- Reviews
- 4.4/5 (G2)
- Free trial
- —
- Deployment
- Cloud
- Best for
- Site-heavy organizations wanting converged SASE (SD-WAN + security + ZTNA) on one platform
Best ZTNA / Business VPN · 2026
Cato Networks vs 
Check Point Harmony SASE (Perimeter 81) Cato Networks vs Check Point Harmony SASE (Perimeter 81): on our data-weighted scoring, Cato Networks edges ahead (7.7 vs 7.7/10). Cato Networks starts at Custom quote and is best for site-heavy organizations wanting converged SASE (SD-WAN + security + ZTNA) on one platform; Check Point Harmony SASE (Perimeter 81) starts at Custom quote and is best for SMB/mid-market teams wanting fast, console-managed SASE without dedicated network engineers. Choose Cato Networks for the stronger overall track record; consider Check Point Harmony SASE (Perimeter 81) if its pricing model or fit matches your environment better. Side-by-side table below.
Affiliate disclosure: Some links may be affiliate or partner links. If you sign up through one, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. This never changes our scores or rankings. Learn more.
Check Point Harmony SASE (Perimeter 81)
7.7/10
MSP Compared score
- Starting price
- Custom quote
- Reviews
- 4.6/5 (~117 G2 reviews)
- Free trial
- —
- Deployment
- Cloud
- Best for
- SMB/mid-market teams wanting fast, console-managed SASE without dedicated network engineers
Strengths at a glance
Six criteria, each scored 0–10 on the same scale from real review data, public pricing and feature coverage. See our methodology →
| Criterion | Cato Networks | Check Point Harmony SASE (Perimeter 81) |
|---|---|---|
| Editorial | 7.7 | 7.7 |
| User reviews | 8.8 | 9.2 |
| Adoption | 0.0 | 5.5 |
| Affordability | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| Feature breadth | 6.0 | 6.0 |
| Ease of trial | 3.0 | 3.0 |
Cato Networks vs Check Point Harmony SASE (Perimeter 81): head-to-head
| Cato Networks | Check Point Harmony SASE (Perimeter 81) | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Custom quote | Custom quote |
| Pricing model | quote | quote |
| Free trial / tier | — | — |
| Best for | Site-heavy organizations wanting converged SASE (SD-WAN + security + ZTNA) on one platform | SMB/mid-market teams wanting fast, console-managed SASE without dedicated network engineers |
| Deployment | Cloud | Cloud |
| G2 rating | 4.4/5 | 4.6/5 (117) |
| Capterra rating | — | — |
| Our score | 7.7 | 7.7 |
Choose Cato Networks if…
You need site-heavy organizations wanting converged sase (sd-wan + security + ztna) on one platform.
✓ Pros
- Truly unified SASE console
- Native SD-WAN (no third party)
- Strong MSP multi-tenancy
✕ Cons
- Quote-only pricing
- Per-socket model favors site-heavy orgs
- Total cost scales with bandwidth
Choose Check Point Harmony SASE (Perimeter 81) if…
You need smb/mid-market teams wanting fast, console-managed sase without dedicated network engineers.
✓ Pros
- Approachable admin experience
- Fast deployment (no hardware)
- Check Point enterprise backing
✕ Cons
- Per-user plus mandatory $50/mo gateway fee
- No free tier
- Now folded into a larger portfolio
In depth
Pricing: Cato Networks vs Check Point Harmony SASE (Perimeter 81)
Cato Networks bills on a quote model from Custom quote (no trial), while Check Point Harmony SASE (Perimeter 81) uses a quote model from Custom quote. Because the models differ, the cheaper option flips depending on your fleet size — model both at your seat/endpoint count.
Features & deployment
Cato Networks ships 6 headline capabilities (Converged SASE (SD-WAN + SSE), Single management console, Native ZTNA + CASB + DLP, Global private backbone (PoPs)) and deploys Cloud. Check Point Harmony SASE (Perimeter 81) ships 6 (Cloud-managed SASE + ZTNA, Per-user network segmentation, Dedicated gateways + static IP, Device posture checks), deploying Cloud.
Ratings & verdict
Cato Networks holds 4.4/5 (G2); Check Point Harmony SASE (Perimeter 81) holds 4.6/5 (~117 G2 reviews). On our data-weighted score, Cato Networks edges ahead (7.7 vs 7.7/10). Pick Check Point Harmony SASE (Perimeter 81) instead when smb/mid-market teams wanting fast, console-managed sase without dedicated network engineers. See Cato Networks alternatives or Check Point Harmony SASE (Perimeter 81) alternatives.
Frequently asked questions
- Cato Networks vs Check Point Harmony SASE (Perimeter 81): which is better?
- Cato Networks vs Check Point Harmony SASE (Perimeter 81): on our data-weighted scoring, Cato Networks edges ahead (7.7 vs 7.7/10). Cato Networks starts at Custom quote and is best for site-heavy organizations wanting converged SASE (SD-WAN + security + ZTNA) on one platform; Check Point Harmony SASE (Perimeter 81) starts at Custom quote and is best for SMB/mid-market teams wanting fast, console-managed SASE without dedicated network engineers.
- Is Cato Networks cheaper than Check Point Harmony SASE (Perimeter 81)?
- Cato Networks starts at Custom quote and Check Point Harmony SASE (Perimeter 81) starts at Custom quote (see the pricing rows for models and limits).
Data as of September 17, 2026. Sources: catonetworks.com, checkpoint.com. Figures are pulled from public vendor and security data and refreshed automatically.