Cato Networks
8.6/10
MSP Compared score
- Starting price
- Custom quote
- Reviews
- 4.4/5 (G2)
- Free trial
- —
- Deployment
- Cloud
- Best for
- Site-heavy organizations wanting converged SASE (SD-WAN + security + ZTNA) on one platform
Best ZTNA / Business VPN · 2026
Cato Networks vs 
Check Point Harmony SASE (Perimeter 81) Cato Networks vs Check Point Harmony SASE (Perimeter 81): on our data-weighted scoring, Check Point Harmony SASE (Perimeter 81) edges ahead (7.9 vs 7.7/10). Cato Networks starts at Custom quote and is best for site-heavy organizations wanting converged sase (sd-wan + security + ztna) on one platform; Check Point Harmony SASE (Perimeter 81) starts at $10/user/mo and is best for smb/mid-market teams wanting fast, console-managed sase without dedicated network engineers. Choose Check Point Harmony SASE (Perimeter 81) for the stronger overall track record; consider Cato Networks if its pricing model or fit matches your environment better. Side-by-side table below.
Check Point Harmony SASE (Perimeter 81)
8.2/10
MSP Compared score
- Starting price
- $10/user/mo
- Reviews
- 4.6/5 (~117 G2 reviews)
- Free trial
- 14 days
- Deployment
- Cloud
- Best for
- SMB/mid-market teams wanting fast, console-managed SASE without dedicated network engineers
Affiliate links — vendors may pay us a commission. It never affects our data-driven ranking.
Strengths at a glance
Six criteria, each scored 0–10 on the same scale from real review data, public pricing and feature coverage. See our methodology →
| Criterion | Cato Networks | Check Point Harmony SASE (Perimeter 81) |
|---|---|---|
| Editorial | 7.7 | 7.9 |
| User reviews | 8.8 | 9.2 |
| Adoption | 0.0 | 5.5 |
| Affordability | 5.0 | 4.1 |
| Feature breadth | 6.0 | 6.0 |
| Ease of trial | 3.0 | 6.0 |
Cato Networks vs Check Point Harmony SASE (Perimeter 81): head-to-head
| Cato Networks | Check Point Harmony SASE (Perimeter 81) | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Custom quote | $10/user/mo |
| Pricing model | quote | per user |
| Free trial / tier | — | 14 days |
| Best for | Site-heavy organizations wanting converged SASE (SD-WAN + security + ZTNA) on one platform | SMB/mid-market teams wanting fast, console-managed SASE without dedicated network engineers |
| Deployment | Cloud | Cloud |
| G2 rating | 4.4/5 | 4.6/5 (117) |
| Capterra rating | — | — |
| Our score | 7.7 | 7.9 |
Choose Cato Networks if…
You need site-heavy organizations wanting converged sase (sd-wan + security + ztna) on one platform.
Pros
- Truly unified SASE console
- Native SD-WAN (no third party)
- Strong MSP multi-tenancy
Cons
- Quote-only pricing
- Per-socket model favors site-heavy orgs
- Total cost scales with bandwidth
Choose Check Point Harmony SASE (Perimeter 81) if…
You need smb/mid-market teams wanting fast, console-managed sase without dedicated network engineers.
Pros
- Approachable admin experience
- Fast deployment (no hardware)
- Check Point enterprise backing
Cons
- Per-user plus mandatory $50/mo gateway fee
- No free tier
- Now folded into a larger portfolio
In depth
Pricing: Cato Networks vs Check Point Harmony SASE (Perimeter 81)
Cato Networks bills on a quote model from Custom quote (no trial), while Check Point Harmony SASE (Perimeter 81) uses a per user model from $10/user/mo (14 days trial). Because the models differ, the cheaper option flips depending on your fleet size — model both at your seat/endpoint count.
Features & deployment
Cato Networks ships 6 headline capabilities (Converged SASE (SD-WAN + SSE), Single management console, Native ZTNA + CASB + DLP, Global private backbone (PoPs)) and deploys Cloud. Check Point Harmony SASE (Perimeter 81) ships 6 (Cloud-managed SASE + ZTNA, Per-user network segmentation, Dedicated gateways + static IP, Device posture checks), deploying Cloud.
Ratings & verdict
Cato Networks holds 4.4/5 (G2); Check Point Harmony SASE (Perimeter 81) holds 4.6/5 (~117 G2 reviews). On our data-weighted score, Cato Networks edges ahead (7.9 vs 7.9/10). Pick Check Point Harmony SASE (Perimeter 81) instead when smb/mid-market teams wanting fast, console-managed sase without dedicated network engineers. See Cato Networks alternatives or Check Point Harmony SASE (Perimeter 81) alternatives.
Frequently asked questions
- Cato Networks vs Check Point Harmony SASE (Perimeter 81): which is better?
- Cato Networks vs Check Point Harmony SASE (Perimeter 81): on our data-weighted scoring, Check Point Harmony SASE (Perimeter 81) edges ahead (7.9 vs 7.7/10). Cato Networks starts at Custom quote and is best for site-heavy organizations wanting converged sase (sd-wan + security + ztna) on one platform; Check Point Harmony SASE (Perimeter 81) starts at $10/user/mo and is best for smb/mid-market teams wanting fast, console-managed sase without dedicated network engineers.
- Is Cato Networks cheaper than Check Point Harmony SASE (Perimeter 81)?
- Cato Networks starts at Custom quote and Check Point Harmony SASE (Perimeter 81) starts at $10/user/mo (see the pricing rows for models and limits).
Data as of June 16, 2026. Sources: catonetworks.com, checkpoint.com. Figures are pulled from public vendor and security data and refreshed automatically.