Cato Networks
7.7/10
MSP Compared score
- Starting price
- Custom quote
- Reviews
- 4.4/5 (G2)
- Free trial
- —
- Deployment
- Cloud
- Best for
- Site-heavy organizations wanting converged SASE (SD-WAN + security + ZTNA) on one platform
Best ZTNA / Business VPN · 2026
Cato Networks vs 
Twingate Cato Networks vs Twingate: on our data-weighted scoring, Twingate edges ahead (8.7 vs 7.7/10). Cato Networks starts at Custom quote and is best for site-heavy organizations wanting converged SASE (SD-WAN + security + ZTNA) on one platform; Twingate starts at $5/user/mo and is best for teams retiring legacy VPN that want fast, connector-based ZTNA with a free tier. Choose Twingate for the stronger overall track record; consider Cato Networks if its pricing model or fit matches your environment better. Side-by-side table below.
Affiliate disclosure: Some links may be affiliate or partner links. If you sign up through one, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. This never changes our scores or rankings. Learn more.
Twingate
8.7/10
MSP Compared score
- Starting price
- $5/user/mo
- Reviews
- 4.7/5 (~69 G2 reviews)
- Free trial
- Free tier + 14 days
- Deployment
- Cloud + self-host
- Best for
- Teams retiring legacy VPN that want fast, connector-based ZTNA with a free tier
Strengths at a glance
Six criteria, each scored 0–10 on the same scale from real review data, public pricing and feature coverage. See our methodology →
| Criterion | Cato Networks | Twingate |
|---|---|---|
| Editorial | 7.7 | 8.7 |
| User reviews | 8.8 | 9.4 |
| Adoption | 0.0 | 4.9 |
| Affordability | 5.0 | 9.5 |
| Feature breadth | 6.0 | 8.0 |
| Ease of trial | 3.0 | 10.0 |
Cato Networks vs Twingate: head-to-head
| Cato Networks | Twingate | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Custom quote | $5/user/mo |
| Pricing model | quote | per user |
| Free trial / tier | — | Free tier + 14 days |
| Best for | Site-heavy organizations wanting converged SASE (SD-WAN + security + ZTNA) on one platform | Teams retiring legacy VPN that want fast, connector-based ZTNA with a free tier |
| Deployment | Cloud | Cloud + self-host |
| G2 rating | 4.4/5 | 4.7/5 (69) |
| Capterra rating | — | — |
| Our score | 7.7 | 8.7 |
Choose Cato Networks if…
You need site-heavy organizations wanting converged sase (sd-wan + security + ztna) on one platform.
✓ Pros
- Truly unified SASE console
- Native SD-WAN (no third party)
- Strong MSP multi-tenancy
✕ Cons
- Quote-only pricing
- Per-socket model favors site-heavy orgs
- Total cost scales with bandwidth
Choose Twingate if…
You need teams retiring legacy vpn that want fast, connector-based ztna with a free tier.
✓ Pros
- Very easy setup vs legacy VPN
- Real free Starter tier
- Strong resource invisibility
✕ Cons
- Entra ID integration needs Business tier
- Smaller scale than Zscaler/Cato
- Per-user cost grows with team
In depth
Pricing: Twingate vs Cato Networks
Twingate bills on a per user model from $5/user/mo (free tier available), while Cato Networks uses a quote model from Custom quote (no trial). Because the models differ, the cheaper option flips depending on your fleet size — model both at your seat/endpoint count.
Features & deployment
Twingate ships 8 headline capabilities (Connector-based ZTNA (resource masking), Free tier up to 5 users, Split tunneling + least-privilege access, IdP integrations (Google) and deploys Cloud + self-host. Cato Networks ships 6 (Converged SASE (SD-WAN + SSE), Single management console, Native ZTNA + CASB + DLP, Global private backbone (PoPs)), deploying Cloud.
Ratings & verdict
Twingate holds 4.7/5 (~69 G2 reviews); Cato Networks holds 4.4/5 (G2). On our data-weighted score, Twingate edges ahead (8.7 vs 7.7/10). Pick Cato Networks instead when site-heavy organizations wanting converged sase (sd-wan + security + ztna) on one platform. See Twingate alternatives or Cato Networks alternatives.
Frequently asked questions
- Cato Networks vs Twingate: which is better?
- Cato Networks vs Twingate: on our data-weighted scoring, Twingate edges ahead (8.7 vs 7.7/10). Cato Networks starts at Custom quote and is best for site-heavy organizations wanting converged SASE (SD-WAN + security + ZTNA) on one platform; Twingate starts at $5/user/mo and is best for teams retiring legacy VPN that want fast, connector-based ZTNA with a free tier.
- Is Cato Networks cheaper than Twingate?
- Cato Networks starts at Custom quote and Twingate starts at $5/user/mo (see the pricing rows for models and limits).
Data as of September 17, 2026. Sources: catonetworks.com, twingate.com. Figures are pulled from public vendor and security data and refreshed automatically.