Cisco Meraki MX
8.3/10
MSP Compared score
- Starting price
- Custom quote
- Reviews
- 4.3/5 (G2)
- Free trial
- 30 days
- Deployment
- Cloud
- Best for
- Multi-site organizations wanting cloud-managed, "set-and-forget" security with Auto VPN
Best Firewall (Small Business) · 2026
Cisco Meraki MX vs 
WatchGuard Firebox Cisco Meraki MX vs WatchGuard Firebox: on our data-weighted scoring, WatchGuard Firebox edges ahead (8.1 vs 7.7/10). Cisco Meraki MX starts at Custom quote and is best for multi-site organizations wanting cloud-managed, "set-and-forget" security with auto vpn; WatchGuard Firebox starts at Custom quote and is best for small offices and msps wanting all-in-one utm with simple bundled licensing and cloud management. Choose WatchGuard Firebox for the stronger overall track record; consider Cisco Meraki MX if its pricing model or fit matches your environment better. Side-by-side table below.
WatchGuard Firebox
8.4/10
MSP Compared score
- Starting price
- Custom quote
- Reviews
- 4.7/5 (~261 G2 reviews)
- Free trial
- 30 days
- Deployment
- On-prem
- Best for
- Small offices and MSPs wanting all-in-one UTM with simple bundled licensing and cloud management
Affiliate links — vendors may pay us a commission. It never affects our data-driven ranking.
Strengths at a glance
Six criteria, each scored 0–10 on the same scale from real review data, public pricing and feature coverage. See our methodology →
| Criterion | Cisco Meraki MX | WatchGuard Firebox |
|---|---|---|
| Editorial | 7.7 | 8.1 |
| User reviews | 8.6 | 9.4 |
| Adoption | 0.0 | 6.4 |
| Affordability | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| Feature breadth | 6.0 | 6.0 |
| Ease of trial | 6.0 | 6.0 |
Cisco Meraki MX vs WatchGuard Firebox: head-to-head
| Cisco Meraki MX | WatchGuard Firebox | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Custom quote | Custom quote |
| Pricing model | quote | quote |
| Free trial / tier | 30 days | 30 days |
| Best for | Multi-site organizations wanting cloud-managed, "set-and-forget" security with Auto VPN | Small offices and MSPs wanting all-in-one UTM with simple bundled licensing and cloud management |
| Deployment | Cloud | On-prem |
| G2 rating | 4.3/5 | 4.7/5 (261) |
| Capterra rating | — | — |
| Our score | 7.7 | 8.1 |
Choose Cisco Meraki MX if…
You need multi-site organizations wanting cloud-managed, "set-and-forget" security with auto vpn.
Pros
- Effortless multi-site management
- Strong Talos threat intelligence
- Best-in-class "set and forget" simplicity
Cons
- Mandatory per-device licensing (stops if it lapses)
- Quote-only pricing
- Pricey at scale
Choose WatchGuard Firebox if…
You need small offices and msps wanting all-in-one utm with simple bundled licensing and cloud management.
Pros
- Simple bundled licensing
- MSP + multi-site friendly
- Competitive value for feature breadth
Cons
- Quote-only pricing
- Top-tier suite excludes smallest models
- Performance trails FortiGate at scale
Frequently asked questions
- Cisco Meraki MX vs WatchGuard Firebox: which is better?
- Cisco Meraki MX vs WatchGuard Firebox: on our data-weighted scoring, WatchGuard Firebox edges ahead (8.1 vs 7.7/10). Cisco Meraki MX starts at Custom quote and is best for multi-site organizations wanting cloud-managed, "set-and-forget" security with auto vpn; WatchGuard Firebox starts at Custom quote and is best for small offices and msps wanting all-in-one utm with simple bundled licensing and cloud management.
- Is Cisco Meraki MX cheaper than WatchGuard Firebox?
- Cisco Meraki MX starts at Custom quote and WatchGuard Firebox starts at Custom quote (see the pricing rows for models and limits).
Data as of June 16, 2026. Sources: meraki.cisco.com, watchguard.com. Figures are pulled from public vendor and security data and refreshed automatically.