Cisco Secure Endpoint
- Starting price
- Custom quote
- Reviews
- 4.4/5 (~150 G2 reviews)
- Free trial
- Free trial
- Deployment
- Cloud
- Best for
- Cisco-centric enterprises wanting integrated EDR
Best Endpoint Security & EDR Software · 2026
Cisco Secure Endpoint vs ThreatLocker: on our data-weighted scoring, ThreatLocker edges ahead (8.2 vs 7.4/10). Cisco Secure Endpoint starts at Custom quote and is best for cisco-centric enterprises wanting integrated EDR; ThreatLocker starts at Custom quote and is best for MSPs wanting Zero Trust allowlisting and ringfencing. Choose ThreatLocker for the stronger overall track record; consider Cisco Secure Endpoint if its pricing model or fit matches your environment better. Side-by-side table below.
Affiliate disclosure: Some links may be affiliate or partner links. If you sign up through one, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. This never changes our scores or rankings. Learn more.
Six criteria, each scored 0–10 on the same scale from real review data, public pricing and feature coverage. See our methodology →
| Criterion | Cisco Secure Endpoint | ThreatLocker |
|---|---|---|
| Editorial | 7.4 | 8.2 |
| User reviews | 8.8 | 9.6 |
| Adoption | 5.8 | 6.4 |
| Affordability | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| Feature breadth | 4.0 | 5.0 |
| Ease of trial | 6.0 | 6.0 |
| Cisco Secure Endpoint | ThreatLocker | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Custom quote | Custom quote |
| Pricing model | quote | quote |
| Free trial / tier | Free trial | 30 days |
| Best for | Cisco-centric enterprises wanting integrated EDR | MSPs wanting Zero Trust allowlisting and ringfencing |
| Deployment | Cloud | Cloud |
| G2 rating | 4.4/5 (150) | 4.8/5 (250) |
| Capterra rating | — | — |
| Our score | 7.4 | 8.2 |
You need cisco-centric enterprises wanting integrated edr.
You need msps wanting zero trust allowlisting and ringfencing.
ThreatLocker bills on a quote model from Custom quote (30 days trial), while Cisco Secure Endpoint uses a quote model from Custom quote (yes trial). Because the models differ, the cheaper option flips depending on your fleet size — model both at your seat/endpoint count.
ThreatLocker ships 5 headline capabilities (Application allowlisting, Ringfencing, Storage control, Elevation control) and deploys Cloud. Cisco Secure Endpoint ships 4 (EDR with Talos intel, SecureX/XDR integration, Threat hunting, Sandboxing), deploying Cloud.
ThreatLocker holds 4.8/5 (~250 G2 reviews); Cisco Secure Endpoint holds 4.4/5 (~150 G2 reviews). On our data-weighted score, ThreatLocker edges ahead (8.2 vs 7.4/10). Pick Cisco Secure Endpoint instead when cisco-centric enterprises wanting integrated edr. See ThreatLocker alternatives or Cisco Secure Endpoint alternatives.