Cisco Secure Endpoint
- Starting price
- Custom quote
- Reviews
- 4.4/5 (~150 G2 reviews)
- Free trial
- Free trial
- Deployment
- Cloud
- Best for
- Cisco-centric enterprises wanting integrated EDR
Best Endpoint Security & EDR Software · 2026
Cisco Secure Endpoint vs ThreatLocker: on our data-weighted scoring, ThreatLocker edges ahead (8.2 vs 7.4/10). Cisco Secure Endpoint starts at Custom quote and is best for cisco-centric enterprises wanting integrated edr; ThreatLocker starts at Custom quote and is best for msps wanting zero trust allowlisting and ringfencing. Choose ThreatLocker for the stronger overall track record; consider Cisco Secure Endpoint if its pricing model or fit matches your environment better. Side-by-side table below.
Affiliate links — vendors may pay us a commission. It never affects our data-driven ranking.
Six criteria, each scored 0–10 on the same scale from real review data, public pricing and feature coverage. See our methodology →
| Criterion | Cisco Secure Endpoint | ThreatLocker |
|---|---|---|
| Editorial | 7.4 | 8.2 |
| User reviews | 8.8 | 9.6 |
| Adoption | 5.8 | 6.4 |
| Affordability | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| Feature breadth | 4.0 | 5.0 |
| Ease of trial | 6.0 | 6.0 |
| Cisco Secure Endpoint | ThreatLocker | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Custom quote | Custom quote |
| Pricing model | quote | quote |
| Free trial / tier | Free trial | 30 days |
| Best for | Cisco-centric enterprises wanting integrated EDR | MSPs wanting Zero Trust allowlisting and ringfencing |
| Deployment | Cloud | Cloud |
| G2 rating | 4.4/5 (150) | 4.8/5 (250) |
| Capterra rating | — | — |
| Our score | 7.4 | 8.2 |
You need cisco-centric enterprises wanting integrated edr.
You need msps wanting zero trust allowlisting and ringfencing.
ThreatLocker bills on a quote model from Custom quote (30 days trial), while Cisco Secure Endpoint uses a quote model from Custom quote (yes trial). Because the models differ, the cheaper option flips depending on your fleet size — model both at your seat/endpoint count.
ThreatLocker ships 5 headline capabilities (Application allowlisting, Ringfencing, Storage control, Elevation control) and deploys Cloud. Cisco Secure Endpoint ships 4 (EDR with Talos intel, SecureX/XDR integration, Threat hunting, Sandboxing), deploying Cloud.
ThreatLocker holds 4.8/5 (~250 G2 reviews); Cisco Secure Endpoint holds 4.4/5 (~150 G2 reviews). On our data-weighted score, ThreatLocker edges ahead (8.2 vs 7.4/10). Pick Cisco Secure Endpoint instead when cisco-centric enterprises wanting integrated edr. See ThreatLocker alternatives or Cisco Secure Endpoint alternatives.