Cisco Secure Endpoint
- Starting price
- Custom quote
- Reviews
- 4.4/5 (~150 G2 reviews)
- Free trial
- Free trial
- Deployment
- Cloud
- Best for
- Cisco-centric enterprises wanting integrated EDR
Best Endpoint Security & EDR Software · 2026
Cisco Secure Endpoint vs Webroot Business Endpoint Protection: on our data-weighted scoring, Webroot Business Endpoint Protection edges ahead (7.6 vs 7.4/10). Cisco Secure Endpoint starts at Custom quote and is best for cisco-centric enterprises wanting integrated EDR; Webroot Business Endpoint Protection starts at Custom quote and is best for MSPs wanting an ultra-light cloud agent for many endpoints. Choose Webroot Business Endpoint Protection for the stronger overall track record; consider Cisco Secure Endpoint if its pricing model or fit matches your environment better. Side-by-side table below.
Affiliate disclosure: Some links may be affiliate or partner links. If you sign up through one, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. This never changes our scores or rankings. Learn more.
Six criteria, each scored 0–10 on the same scale from real review data, public pricing and feature coverage. See our methodology →
| Criterion | Cisco Secure Endpoint | Webroot Business Endpoint Protection |
|---|---|---|
| Editorial | 7.4 | 7.6 |
| User reviews | 8.8 | 9.2 |
| Adoption | 5.8 | 7.1 |
| Affordability | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| Feature breadth | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| Ease of trial | 6.0 | 6.0 |
| Cisco Secure Endpoint | Webroot Business Endpoint Protection | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Custom quote | Custom quote |
| Pricing model | quote | per endpoint |
| Free trial / tier | Free trial | 30 days |
| Best for | Cisco-centric enterprises wanting integrated EDR | MSPs wanting an ultra-light cloud agent for many endpoints |
| Deployment | Cloud | Cloud |
| G2 rating | 4.4/5 (150) | 4.6/5 (500) |
| Capterra rating | — | — |
| Our score | 7.4 | 7.6 |
You need cisco-centric enterprises wanting integrated edr.
You need msps wanting an ultra-light cloud agent for many endpoints.
Both solutions use quote-based pricing, making direct comparison difficult. Webroot operates on a per-endpoint model, while Cisco does not publish per-seat costs. Both offer free trials (Webroot: 30 days; Cisco: yes, unspecified duration). Neither has a free tier.
For MSPs managing dozens or hundreds of endpoints, Webroot’s per-endpoint approach typically offers better cost visibility and scalability predictability. Cisco’s pricing tends to favor larger enterprise deployments with existing Cisco investments.
| Aspect | Webroot | Cisco |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing Model | Per-endpoint | Quote-based |
| Trial | 30 days | Yes |
| Free Tier | No | No |
Webroot emphasizes simplicity and performance:
Cisco targets threat hunters and integrated defenders:
The products serve different personas. Webroot wins on agent footprint and MSP operations; Cisco wins on detection depth and ecosystem integration.
| Platform | G2 Score | Reviews | Our Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Webroot | 4.6 | 500 | 7.6 |
| Cisco | 4.4 | 150 | 7.4 |
Webroot’s higher review count and score reflect strong MSP satisfaction with its lean deployment model. Cisco’s smaller review base suggests a more enterprise-focused user base with different expectations.
Choose Webroot if you’re an MSP prioritizing agent efficiency, fast deployment, and per-endpoint economics. Choose Cisco if you’re deeply invested in Cisco infrastructure and need advanced EDR with threat intelligence—accept heavier admin overhead and custom pricing.