Cynomi
7.1/10
MSP Compared score
- Starting price
- Custom quote
- Reviews
- Not yet rated
- Free trial
- —
- Deployment
- Cloud
- Best for
- MSPs and MSSPs delivering vCISO and compliance-as-a-service to SMB clients at scale
Best GRC / Compliance Automation Software · 2026
Cynomi vs 
Thoropass Cynomi vs Thoropass: on our data-weighted scoring, Thoropass edges ahead (7.7 vs 7.1/10). Cynomi starts at Custom quote and is best for MSPs and MSSPs delivering vCISO and compliance-as-a-service to SMB clients at scale; Thoropass starts at Custom quote and is best for growth-stage teams that want compliance software and the SOC 2 / ISO audit from one vendor. Choose Thoropass for the stronger overall track record; consider Cynomi if its pricing model or fit matches your environment better. Side-by-side table below.
Affiliate disclosure: Some links may be affiliate or partner links. If you sign up through one, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. This never changes our scores or rankings. Learn more.
Thoropass
7.7/10
MSP Compared score
- Starting price
- Custom quote
- Reviews
- 4.7/5 (~575 G2 reviews)
- Free trial
- —
- Deployment
- Cloud
- Best for
- Growth-stage teams that want compliance software and the SOC 2 / ISO audit from one vendor
Strengths at a glance
Six criteria, each scored 0–10 on the same scale from real review data, public pricing and feature coverage. See our methodology →
| Criterion | Cynomi | Thoropass |
|---|---|---|
| Editorial | 7.1 | 7.7 |
| User reviews | 7.0 | 9.4 |
| Adoption | 0.0 | 7.3 |
| Affordability | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| Feature breadth | 6.0 | 6.0 |
| Ease of trial | 3.0 | 3.0 |
Cynomi vs Thoropass: head-to-head
| Cynomi | Thoropass | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Custom quote | Custom quote |
| Pricing model | quote | quote |
| Free trial / tier | — | — |
| Best for | MSPs and MSSPs delivering vCISO and compliance-as-a-service to SMB clients at scale | Growth-stage teams that want compliance software and the SOC 2 / ISO audit from one vendor |
| Deployment | Cloud | Cloud |
| G2 rating | — | 4.7/5 (575) |
| Capterra rating | — | — |
| Our score | 7.1 | 7.7 |
Choose Cynomi if…
You need msps and mssps delivering vciso and compliance-as-a-service to smb clients at scale.
✓ Pros
- Purpose-built for MSPs/MSSPs
- Scales vCISO services without added headcount
- Strong client-facing reporting
✕ Cons
- Channel-only (no direct sale)
- Fixed framework library (no custom uploads)
- Thin public review volume
Choose Thoropass if…
You need growth-stage teams that want compliance software and the soc 2 / iso audit from one vendor.
✓ Pros
- Software plus AICPA-registered audit in one contract
- Rare public AWS Marketplace pricing
- Shorter audit cycles
✕ Cons
- Premium bundled pricing
- UI clutter at scale
- Smaller integration catalog than Vanta/Drata
In depth
In Depth
Pricing
| Aspect | Thoropass | Cynomi |
|---|---|---|
| Model | Quote-based | Quote-based |
| Free Tier / Trial | None | None |
| Public Pricing | $8.7K–$5.8K/yr (AWS Marketplace) | Undisclosed |
| Bundle Estimates | $35K–$80K/yr (platform + audit) | N/A |
| Target Market | Direct enterprise / startups | MSPs/MSSPs only |
Thoropass publishes floor pricing on AWS Marketplace, making budgeting predictable. The $8.7K platform subscription includes one framework; audits run $5.8K/yr separately. Full compliance bundles land in the $35K–$80K range for SMBs. Cynomi remains opaque—pricing is entirely custom per MSP tier (Core, Pro, TPRM add-on) with no published rates, reflecting its channel-only model.
Features & Deployment
Both deploy as cloud-native SaaS, but serve different buyers:
| Feature | Thoropass | Cynomi |
|---|---|---|
| Core Offering | Compliance platform + in-house audit | Multi-tenant vCISO delivery layer |
| Frameworks | 30+ (HITRUST, SOC 2, ISO, etc.) | 40+ mapped for compliance |
| Evidence Automation | Yes (100+ integrations) | Risk assessments; no deep scanner data |
| Audit Inclusion | Connected Audit (AICPA-registered auditors) | No; compliance reporting only |
| Multi-Tenancy | Single-tenant focus | Full MSP multi-tenant stack |
| Client Reporting | Native | Tailored, client-facing dashboards |
Thoropass is an all-in-one compliance OS with audit teeth—you get the software, the evidence connectors, and the auditors. Cynomi is a vCISO enabler: it synthesizes risk data, maps frameworks, and produces polished reports, but doesn’t scan infrastructure or conduct audits. It’s a reporting and advisory layer for MSPs to white-label.
Ratings & Trust
| Source | Thoropass | Cynomi |
|---|---|---|
| G2 Score | 4.7 / 5 (575 reviews) | No public reviews |
| Our Score | 7.7 / 10 | 7.1 / 10 |
Thoropass has substantial public traction; Cynomi has negligible review volume, partly by design (channel-only, not yet a household name in the compliance SaaS world).
Verdict
Choose Thoropass if you’re a growth-stage company building internal compliance for SOC 2 / ISO / HITRUST and want audit and software from one vendor, with real pricing you can anchor on.
Choose Cynomi if you’re an MSP or MSSP that needs to deliver compliance-as-a-service to 20+ clients without hiring a team of compliance analysts—it’s a productivity multiplier and white-label engine, not an infrastructure scanner.
They solve fundamentally different problems: Thoropass is compliance software + audit, Cynomi is vCISO-in-a-box for resellers. No direct competition.
Frequently asked questions
- Cynomi vs Thoropass: which is better?
- Cynomi vs Thoropass: on our data-weighted scoring, Thoropass edges ahead (7.7 vs 7.1/10). Cynomi starts at Custom quote and is best for MSPs and MSSPs delivering vCISO and compliance-as-a-service to SMB clients at scale; Thoropass starts at Custom quote and is best for growth-stage teams that want compliance software and the SOC 2 / ISO audit from one vendor.
- Is Cynomi cheaper than Thoropass?
- Cynomi starts at Custom quote and Thoropass starts at Custom quote (see the pricing rows for models and limits).
Data as of September 14, 2026. Sources: cynomi.com, aws.amazon.com. Figures are pulled from public vendor and security data and refreshed automatically.