Drata
8.2/10
MSP Compared score
- Starting price
- Custom quote
- Reviews
- 4.8/5 (~1.1k G2 reviews)
- Free trial
- —
- Deployment
- Cloud
- Best for
- Growth-stage teams scaling headcount that want deep automation and a built-in Trust Center
Best GRC / Compliance Automation Software · 2026
Drata vs 
Hyperproof Drata vs Hyperproof: on our data-weighted scoring, Drata edges ahead (8.2 vs 7.5/10). Drata starts at Custom quote and is best for growth-stage teams scaling headcount that want deep automation and a built-in Trust Center; Hyperproof starts at Custom quote and is best for mid-market GRC teams managing many frameworks who want workload-based, unlimited-user pricing. Choose Drata for the stronger overall track record; consider Hyperproof if its pricing model or fit matches your environment better. Side-by-side table below.
Affiliate disclosure: Some links may be affiliate or partner links. If you sign up through one, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. This never changes our scores or rankings. Learn more.
Hyperproof
7.5/10
MSP Compared score
- Starting price
- Custom quote
- Reviews
- 4.5/5 (~190 G2 reviews)
- Free trial
- —
- Deployment
- Cloud
- Best for
- Mid-market GRC teams managing many frameworks who want workload-based, unlimited-user pricing
Strengths at a glance
Six criteria, each scored 0–10 on the same scale from real review data, public pricing and feature coverage. See our methodology →
| Criterion | Drata | Hyperproof |
|---|---|---|
| Editorial | 8.2 | 7.5 |
| User reviews | 9.6 | 9.0 |
| Adoption | 8.1 | 6.0 |
| Affordability | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| Feature breadth | 6.0 | 6.0 |
| Ease of trial | 3.0 | 3.0 |
Drata vs Hyperproof: head-to-head
| Drata | Hyperproof | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Custom quote | Custom quote |
| Pricing model | quote | quote |
| Free trial / tier | — | — |
| Best for | Growth-stage teams scaling headcount that want deep automation and a built-in Trust Center | Mid-market GRC teams managing many frameworks who want workload-based, unlimited-user pricing |
| Deployment | Cloud | Cloud |
| G2 rating | 4.8/5 (1100) | 4.5/5 (190) |
| Capterra rating | — | — |
| Our score | 8.2 | 7.5 |
Choose Drata if…
You need growth-stage teams scaling headcount that want deep automation and a built-in trust center.
✓ Pros
- Top-rated automation (G2 4.8)
- SafeBase Trust Center included
- Strong onboarding support
✕ Cons
- Quote-only pricing
- Implementation fees charged separately
- Renewal uplifts reported
Choose Hyperproof if…
You need mid-market grc teams managing many frameworks who want workload-based, unlimited-user pricing.
✓ Pros
- Workload-based pricing with no per-seat fees
- Deep multi-framework GRC operations
- Strong for established programs
✕ Cons
- Separate implementation fee
- Steeper learning curve
- Fewer integrations (~110)
In depth
Pricing
Both platforms operate on quote-based annual contracts with no transparent public pricing or free trials.
| Aspect | Drata | Hyperproof |
|---|---|---|
| Model | Employee-count tiers (Foundation: <50; Advanced: mid-market; Enterprise: 200+) | Workload-based; unlimited users regardless of tier |
| Starting Range | Not published | ~$12,000/yr (Professional tier, per Capterra/GetApp) |
| Hidden Costs | Implementation fees separate | Implementation fees separate |
| Renewal Risk | Known uplift concerns | Not flagged |
Winner: Hyperproof’s unlimited-user model scales better for large teams; Drata’s per-employee approach penalizes headcount growth.
Features & Deployment
Both are cloud-only SaaS platforms designed for compliance automation, but with different breadth:
| Feature | Drata | Hyperproof |
|---|---|---|
| Frameworks | 30+ | 20+ |
| Integrations | 300+ | ~110 |
| Automation | Automated evidence collection + continuous monitoring | Hypersync evidence automation + audit workflows |
| Trust Center | SafeBase included | Not highlighted |
| Vendor Risk | AI-powered vendor risk mgmt | Risk + vendor management |
| Users | Per-seat licensing | Unlimited |
Drata is built for rapid single- and multi-framework scaling with deep integration coverage and a polished vendor-facing Trust Center—ideal for growth teams. Hyperproof is built for mature GRC operations managing many frameworks with complex workflows; its unlimited-user model rewards established programs that have dozens of stakeholders.
Ratings & Verdict
| Metric | Drata | Hyperproof |
|---|---|---|
| G2 Score | 4.8/5 (1,100 reviews) | 4.5/5 (190 reviews) |
| Our Score | 8.2/10 | 7.5/10 |
Drata: The automation favorite. Highest-rated platform on G2, praised for polished UX and out-of-the-box evidence collection. SafeBase Trust Center is a differentiator for vendor due diligence. Best for growth-stage teams scaling fast who want to minimize manual compliance work.
Hyperproof: The GRC-ops backbone. Fewer reviews but strong for established programs managing multiple complex frameworks simultaneously. Unlimited-user pricing is a structural advantage for large orgs; the trade-off is a steeper learning curve and fewer pre-built integrations.
Choose Drata if you’re growing fast, want fastest time-to-audit, and need a customer-facing Trust Center. Choose Hyperproof if you’re mid-market or larger, manage 4+ frameworks, have many stakeholders, and per-seat pricing is breaking your budget.
Frequently asked questions
- Drata vs Hyperproof: which is better?
- Drata vs Hyperproof: on our data-weighted scoring, Drata edges ahead (8.2 vs 7.5/10). Drata starts at Custom quote and is best for growth-stage teams scaling headcount that want deep automation and a built-in Trust Center; Hyperproof starts at Custom quote and is best for mid-market GRC teams managing many frameworks who want workload-based, unlimited-user pricing.
- Is Drata cheaper than Hyperproof?
- Drata starts at Custom quote and Hyperproof starts at Custom quote (see the pricing rows for models and limits).
Data as of September 14, 2026. Sources: drata.com, hyperproof.io. Figures are pulled from public vendor and security data and refreshed automatically.