Drata
8.2/10
MSP Compared score
- Starting price
- Custom quote
- Reviews
- 4.8/5 (~1.1k G2 reviews)
- Free trial
- —
- Deployment
- Cloud
- Best for
- Growth-stage teams scaling headcount that want deep automation and a built-in Trust Center
Best GRC / Compliance Automation Software · 2026
Drata vs 
Scrut Automation Drata vs Scrut Automation: on our data-weighted scoring, Drata edges ahead (8.2 vs 8.0/10). Drata starts at Custom quote and is best for growth-stage teams scaling headcount that want deep automation and a built-in Trust Center; Scrut Automation starts at Custom quote and is best for risk-first, multi-cloud teams in regulated industries wanting GRC plus cloud posture monitoring. Choose Drata for the stronger overall track record; consider Scrut Automation if its pricing model or fit matches your environment better. Side-by-side table below.
Affiliate disclosure: Some links may be affiliate or partner links. If you sign up through one, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. This never changes our scores or rankings. Learn more.
Scrut Automation
8.0/10
MSP Compared score
- Starting price
- Custom quote
- Reviews
- 4.9/5 (~1.3k G2 reviews)
- Free trial
- —
- Deployment
- Cloud
- Best for
- Risk-first, multi-cloud teams in regulated industries wanting GRC plus cloud posture monitoring
Strengths at a glance
Six criteria, each scored 0–10 on the same scale from real review data, public pricing and feature coverage. See our methodology →
| Criterion | Drata | Scrut Automation |
|---|---|---|
| Editorial | 8.2 | 8.0 |
| User reviews | 9.6 | 9.8 |
| Adoption | 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Affordability | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| Feature breadth | 6.0 | 6.0 |
| Ease of trial | 3.0 | 3.0 |
Drata vs Scrut Automation: head-to-head
| Drata | Scrut Automation | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Custom quote | Custom quote |
| Pricing model | quote | quote |
| Free trial / tier | — | — |
| Best for | Growth-stage teams scaling headcount that want deep automation and a built-in Trust Center | Risk-first, multi-cloud teams in regulated industries wanting GRC plus cloud posture monitoring |
| Deployment | Cloud | Cloud |
| G2 rating | 4.8/5 (1100) | 4.9/5 (1300) |
| Capterra rating | — | — |
| Our score | 8.2 | 8.0 |
Choose Drata if…
You need growth-stage teams scaling headcount that want deep automation and a built-in trust center.
✓ Pros
- Top-rated automation (G2 4.8)
- SafeBase Trust Center included
- Strong onboarding support
✕ Cons
- Quote-only pricing
- Implementation fees charged separately
- Renewal uplifts reported
Choose Scrut Automation if…
You need risk-first, multi-cloud teams in regulated industries wanting grc plus cloud posture monitoring.
✓ Pros
- Highest user rating (G2 4.9)
- Strong risk + cloud-posture focus
- Responsive support and value
✕ Cons
- Quote-only pricing
- Occasional performance issues at scale
- Smaller brand in North America
In depth
In Depth
Pricing
Both platforms use quote-based pricing with no published starting rates, making direct comparison challenging. Here’s what we know:
| Aspect | Drata | Scrut Automation |
|---|---|---|
| Model | Quote-based | Quote-based |
| Tiers | Foundation, Advanced, Enterprise | Up to 20 employees, Growth/Enterprise |
| Starting Point | Under 50 employees (Foundation) | ~$15,000/yr (AWS Marketplace, 20-employee band) |
| Billing | Annual | Annual |
| Add-ons | Implementation fees separate | Included in quote |
Drata’s tiering is more granular but opaque; Scrut shows slightly more pricing transparency via AWS Marketplace. Both charge based on headcount and framework count, so enterprise deals will vary significantly.
Features & Deployment
| Capability | Drata | Scrut Automation |
|---|---|---|
| Frameworks | 30+ | 60+ |
| Integrations | 300+ | 75+ |
| Automated Evidence | ✓ | ✓ |
| Continuous Monitoring | Control monitoring | Cloud posture monitoring |
| Trust Center | SafeBase (built-in) | — |
| Risk Management | AI vendor risk | AI-powered GRC + risk register |
| Deployment | Cloud | Cloud |
Verdict on features: Scrut offers broader framework coverage and specializes in cloud security posture—ideal for multi-cloud risk teams. Drata wins on integration breadth and includes a polished Trust Center for vendor management, better suited to growth-stage companies scaling outbound.
Ratings & User Sentiment
| Platform | G2 Score | Review Count | Our Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Drata | 4.8 | 1,100 | 8.2 |
| Scrut Automation | 4.9 | 1,300 | 8.0 |
Scrut edges Drata on G2 (4.9 vs. 4.8) with a larger review base, reflecting strong user satisfaction. Drata’s slight lead in our overall score reflects its superior onboarding and automation maturity, though the gap is marginal.
Verdict
Choose Drata if you’re scaling fast and need the most seamless automation + a built-in Trust Center to manage vendor requests. Highest brand recognition, strongest implementation support, and the most integrations.
Choose Scrut Automation if cloud security posture and risk-first governance matter as much as compliance certificates—and you operate across multiple cloud providers. Better user ratings, broader framework coverage, and more responsive for risk-focused teams in regulated sectors.
Frequently asked questions
- Drata vs Scrut Automation: which is better?
- Drata vs Scrut Automation: on our data-weighted scoring, Drata edges ahead (8.2 vs 8.0/10). Drata starts at Custom quote and is best for growth-stage teams scaling headcount that want deep automation and a built-in Trust Center; Scrut Automation starts at Custom quote and is best for risk-first, multi-cloud teams in regulated industries wanting GRC plus cloud posture monitoring.
- Is Drata cheaper than Scrut Automation?
- Drata starts at Custom quote and Scrut Automation starts at Custom quote (see the pricing rows for models and limits).