ESET PROTECT
8.3/10
MSP Compared score
- Starting price
- Custom quote
- Reviews
- 4.6/5 (~800 G2 reviews)
- Free trial
- 30 days
- Deployment
- Cloud + on-prem
- Best for
- Teams wanting lightweight, reliable endpoint protection
Best Endpoint Security & EDR Software · 2026
ESET PROTECT vs 
ThreatLocker ESET PROTECT vs ThreatLocker: on our data-weighted scoring, ThreatLocker edges ahead (8.2 vs 7.9/10). ESET PROTECT starts at Custom quote and is best for teams wanting lightweight, reliable endpoint protection; ThreatLocker starts at Custom quote and is best for msps wanting zero trust allowlisting and ringfencing. Choose ThreatLocker for the stronger overall track record; consider ESET PROTECT if its pricing model or fit matches your environment better. Side-by-side table below.
ThreatLocker
8.7/10
MSP Compared score
- Starting price
- Custom quote
- Reviews
- 4.8/5 (~250 G2 reviews)
- Free trial
- 30 days
- Deployment
- Cloud
- Best for
- MSPs wanting Zero Trust allowlisting and ringfencing
Affiliate links — vendors may pay us a commission. It never affects our data-driven ranking.
Strengths at a glance
Six criteria, each scored 0–10 on the same scale from real review data, public pricing and feature coverage. See our methodology →
| Criterion | ESET PROTECT | ThreatLocker |
|---|---|---|
| Editorial | 7.9 | 8.2 |
| User reviews | 9.2 | 9.6 |
| Adoption | 7.7 | 6.4 |
| Affordability | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| Feature breadth | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| Ease of trial | 6.0 | 6.0 |
ESET PROTECT vs ThreatLocker: head-to-head
| ESET PROTECT | ThreatLocker | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Custom quote | Custom quote |
| Pricing model | per device | quote |
| Free trial / tier | 30 days | 30 days |
| Best for | Teams wanting lightweight, reliable endpoint protection | MSPs wanting Zero Trust allowlisting and ringfencing |
| Deployment | Cloud + on-prem | Cloud |
| G2 rating | 4.6/5 (800) | 4.8/5 (250) |
| Capterra rating | — | — |
| Our score | 7.9 | 8.2 |
Choose ESET PROTECT if…
You need teams wanting lightweight, reliable endpoint protection.
Pros
- Very light agent
- Reliable detection
- Flexible deployment
Cons
- EDR is higher tier
- Quote pricing
- Smaller US channel
Choose ThreatLocker if…
You need msps wanting zero trust allowlisting and ringfencing.
Pros
- Powerful Zero Trust controls
- Excellent support
- Strong MSP fit
Cons
- Allowlisting requires ongoing tuning
- Quote pricing
- Different model than AV/EDR
In depth
Pricing: ThreatLocker vs ESET PROTECT
ThreatLocker bills on a quote model from Custom quote (30 days trial), while ESET PROTECT uses a per device model from Custom quote (30 days trial). Because the models differ, the cheaper option flips depending on your fleet size — model both at your seat/endpoint count.
Features & deployment
ThreatLocker ships 5 headline capabilities (Application allowlisting, Ringfencing, Storage control, Elevation control) and deploys Cloud. ESET PROTECT ships 5 (Lightweight AV, EDR (Inspect), Full-disk encryption, Cloud console), deploying Cloud + on-prem.
Ratings & verdict
ThreatLocker holds 4.8/5 (~250 G2 reviews); ESET PROTECT holds 4.6/5 (~800 G2 reviews). On our data-weighted score, ThreatLocker edges ahead (8.2 vs 7.9/10). Pick ESET PROTECT instead when teams wanting lightweight, reliable endpoint protection. See ThreatLocker alternatives or ESET PROTECT alternatives.
Frequently asked questions
- ESET PROTECT vs ThreatLocker: which is better?
- ESET PROTECT vs ThreatLocker: on our data-weighted scoring, ThreatLocker edges ahead (8.2 vs 7.9/10). ESET PROTECT starts at Custom quote and is best for teams wanting lightweight, reliable endpoint protection; ThreatLocker starts at Custom quote and is best for msps wanting zero trust allowlisting and ringfencing.
- Is ESET PROTECT cheaper than ThreatLocker?
- ESET PROTECT starts at Custom quote and ThreatLocker starts at Custom quote (see the pricing rows for models and limits).
Data as of June 16, 2026. Sources: eset.com, threatlocker.com. Figures are pulled from public vendor and security data and refreshed automatically.