ESET PROTECT
7.9/10
MSP Compared score
- Starting price
- Custom quote
- Reviews
- 4.6/5 (~800 G2 reviews)
- Free trial
- 30 days
- Deployment
- Cloud + on-prem
- Best for
- Teams wanting lightweight, reliable endpoint protection
Best Endpoint Security & EDR Software · 2026
ESET PROTECT vs 
Webroot Business Endpoint Protection ESET PROTECT vs Webroot Business Endpoint Protection: on our data-weighted scoring, ESET PROTECT edges ahead (7.9 vs 7.6/10). ESET PROTECT starts at Custom quote and is best for teams wanting lightweight, reliable endpoint protection; Webroot Business Endpoint Protection starts at Custom quote and is best for MSPs wanting an ultra-light cloud agent for many endpoints. Choose ESET PROTECT for the stronger overall track record; consider Webroot Business Endpoint Protection if its pricing model or fit matches your environment better. Side-by-side table below.
Affiliate disclosure: Some links may be affiliate or partner links. If you sign up through one, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. This never changes our scores or rankings. Learn more.
Webroot Business Endpoint Protection
7.6/10
MSP Compared score
- Starting price
- Custom quote
- Reviews
- 4.6/5 (~500 G2 reviews)
- Free trial
- 30 days
- Deployment
- Cloud
- Best for
- MSPs wanting an ultra-light cloud agent for many endpoints
Strengths at a glance
Six criteria, each scored 0–10 on the same scale from real review data, public pricing and feature coverage. See our methodology →
| Criterion | ESET PROTECT | Webroot Business Endpoint Protection |
|---|---|---|
| Editorial | 7.9 | 7.6 |
| User reviews | 9.2 | 9.2 |
| Adoption | 7.7 | 7.1 |
| Affordability | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| Feature breadth | 5.0 | 4.0 |
| Ease of trial | 6.0 | 6.0 |
ESET PROTECT vs Webroot Business Endpoint Protection: head-to-head
| ESET PROTECT | Webroot Business Endpoint Protection | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Custom quote | Custom quote |
| Pricing model | per device | per endpoint |
| Free trial / tier | 30 days | 30 days |
| Best for | Teams wanting lightweight, reliable endpoint protection | MSPs wanting an ultra-light cloud agent for many endpoints |
| Deployment | Cloud + on-prem | Cloud |
| G2 rating | 4.6/5 (800) | 4.6/5 (500) |
| Capterra rating | — | — |
| Our score | 7.9 | 7.6 |
Choose ESET PROTECT if…
You need teams wanting lightweight, reliable endpoint protection.
✓ Pros
- Very light agent
- Reliable detection
- Flexible deployment
✕ Cons
- EDR is higher tier
- Quote pricing
- Smaller US channel
Choose Webroot Business Endpoint Protection if…
You need msps wanting an ultra-light cloud agent for many endpoints.
✓ Pros
- Extremely lightweight
- Fast scans
- MSP-friendly
✕ Cons
- Lighter EDR depth
- Detection trails leaders in tests
- Quote pricing
In depth
In Depth
Pricing
Both solutions use per-device/endpoint pricing models with no free tier and require quotes for final costs. Each offers a 30-day free trial.
| Aspect | ESET PROTECT | Webroot |
|---|---|---|
| Model | Per-device | Per-endpoint |
| Free Tier | No | No |
| Trial | 30 days | 30 days |
| Transparency | Quote-based | Quote-based |
ESET PROTECT’s per-device model may scale differently than Webroot’s per-endpoint approach depending on your environment, but both require direct vendor contact for pricing.
Features & Deployment
ESET PROTECT offers broader platform flexibility with hybrid cloud + on-premises deployment options. Its feature set includes lightweight antivirus, EDR (via the Inspect module—though at a higher tier), full-disk encryption, and a cloud console. The agent footprint is notably small, making it suitable for resource-constrained environments.
Webroot is cloud-native only, emphasizing an ultra-lightweight agent optimized for MSPs managing many endpoints at scale. Its differentiators are journaling/rollback capabilities and optional DNS protection, but it trades some EDR depth for speed and simplicity.
Verdict on Features: ESET PROTECT wins for organizations needing on-premises flexibility and integrated encryption. Webroot wins for MSPs and cloud-first operations prioritizing agent footprint and scan speed.
Ratings & Our Assessment
| Source | ESET PROTECT | Webroot |
|---|---|---|
| G2 Score | 4.6/5 (800 reviews) | 4.6/5 (500 reviews) |
| Our Score | 7.9/10 | 7.6/10 |
Both earn identical G2 scores, though ESET benefits from a larger reviewer base, suggesting stronger market penetration. ESET’s 0.3-point lead in our scoring reflects its deployment flexibility and more mature EDR offering. However, Webroot’s lighter profile appeals to a specific segment.
Verdict
Choose ESET PROTECT if you need hybrid deployment, integrated encryption, and reliable EDR capabilities without sacrificing agent efficiency. Choose Webroot if you’re an MSP managing hundreds of endpoints and value minimal resource consumption and fast cloud-based management above all else. Both are solid performers—the choice hinges on deployment model and organizational size.
Frequently asked questions
- ESET PROTECT vs Webroot Business Endpoint Protection: which is better?
- ESET PROTECT vs Webroot Business Endpoint Protection: on our data-weighted scoring, ESET PROTECT edges ahead (7.9 vs 7.6/10). ESET PROTECT starts at Custom quote and is best for teams wanting lightweight, reliable endpoint protection; Webroot Business Endpoint Protection starts at Custom quote and is best for MSPs wanting an ultra-light cloud agent for many endpoints.
- Is ESET PROTECT cheaper than Webroot Business Endpoint Protection?
- ESET PROTECT starts at Custom quote and Webroot Business Endpoint Protection starts at Custom quote (see the pricing rows for models and limits).
Data as of September 17, 2026. Sources: eset.com, webroot.com. Figures are pulled from public vendor and security data and refreshed automatically.