Expel
- Starting price
- Custom quote
- Reviews
- 4.7/5 (~90 G2 reviews)
- Free trial
- —
- Deployment
- Cloud
- Best for
- Mid-market/enterprise wanting transparent MDR across their existing tools
Best MDR / XDR Software · 2026
Expel vs Huntress: on our data-weighted scoring, Huntress edges ahead (8.6 vs 7.5/10). Expel starts at Custom quote and is best for mid-market/enterprise wanting transparent MDR across their existing tools; Huntress starts at Custom quote and is best for MSPs and SMBs wanting affordable managed detection with a real human SOC. Choose Huntress for the stronger overall track record; consider Expel if its pricing model or fit matches your environment better. Side-by-side table below.
Affiliate disclosure: Some links may be affiliate or partner links. If you sign up through one, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. This never changes our scores or rankings. Learn more.
Six criteria, each scored 0–10 on the same scale from real review data, public pricing and feature coverage. See our methodology →
| Criterion | Expel | Huntress |
|---|---|---|
| Editorial | 7.5 | 8.6 |
| User reviews | 9.4 | 9.8 |
| Adoption | 5.2 | 7.5 |
| Affordability | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| Feature breadth | 4.0 | 5.0 |
| Ease of trial | 3.0 | 6.0 |
| Expel | Huntress | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Custom quote | Custom quote |
| Pricing model | quote | per endpoint |
| Free trial / tier | — | Free trial |
| Best for | Mid-market/enterprise wanting transparent MDR across their existing tools | MSPs and SMBs wanting affordable managed detection with a real human SOC |
| Deployment | Cloud | Cloud |
| G2 rating | 4.7/5 (90) | 4.9/5 (700) |
| Capterra rating | — | — |
| Our score | 7.5 | 8.6 |
You need mid-market/enterprise wanting transparent mdr across their existing tools.
You need msps and smbs wanting affordable managed detection with a real human soc.
| Aspect | Huntress | Expel |
|---|---|---|
| Model | Per-endpoint | Quote-based |
| Best For | MSPs, SMBs (predictable scaling) | Mid-market, enterprise (custom deals) |
| Transparency | Published tiers available | Enterprise negotiations required |
| Trial | Yes | Contact sales |
Huntress wins on predictability—you know what you’re paying per machine. Expel requires a sales conversation, which typically means higher minimums and longer sales cycles. For SMBs, Huntress is the faster path to deployment.
Both deploy cloud-native, but with different angles:
Huntress focuses on breadth for MSPs:
Expel prioritizes transparency and tool agnosticism:
Verdict on features: Huntress is a complete platform with strong identity coverage; Expel is a wrapper that improves your existing tools. Choose Huntress if you want a unified product, Expel if you want someone to manage your heterogeneous environment.
| Platform | Huntress | Expel |
|---|---|---|
| G2 Score | 4.9/5 | 4.7/5 |
| Reviews | 700 | 90 |
| Our Score | 8.6 | 7.5 |
Huntress has significantly more community feedback, reflecting its MSP popularity. Expel’s smaller review count reflects enterprise-focused, custom deployments. Both score well, but Huntress edges ahead on volume and sentiment.
Choose Huntress if you’re an MSP or SMB wanting a turnkey EDR with actual humans monitoring it, plus ITDR, at predictable per-seat costs.
Choose Expel if you’re mid-market/enterprise, already have a security stack, and want a mature SOC to manage it transparently without ripping and replacing.
Huntress is the faster, cheaper entry point. Expel is the premium, vendor-agnostic choice for complex environments.