Best MDR / XDR Software · 2026

Expel logoExpel vs Huntress logoHuntress

Expel vs Huntress: on our data-weighted scoring, Huntress edges ahead (8.6 vs 7.5/10). Expel starts at Custom quote and is best for mid-market/enterprise wanting transparent mdr across their existing tools; Huntress starts at Custom quote and is best for msps and smbs wanting affordable managed detection with a real human soc. Choose Huntress for the stronger overall track record; consider Expel if its pricing model or fit matches your environment better. Side-by-side table below.

Expel

8.3/10
MSP Compared score
Starting price
Custom quote
Reviews
4.7/5 (~90 G2 reviews)
Free trial
Deployment
Cloud
Best for
Mid-market/enterprise wanting transparent MDR across their existing tools
Visit Expel →
Our pick

Huntress

9.2/10
MSP Compared score
Starting price
Custom quote
Reviews
4.9/5 (~700 G2 reviews)
Free trial
Free trial
Deployment
Cloud
Best for
MSPs and SMBs wanting affordable managed detection with a real human SOC
Visit Huntress →

Affiliate links — vendors may pay us a commission. It never affects our data-driven ranking.

Strengths at a glance

Six criteria, each scored 0–10 on the same scale from real review data, public pricing and feature coverage. See our methodology →

EditorialUser reviewsAdoptionAffordabilityFeature breadthEase of trial
ExpelHuntress
CriterionExpelHuntress
Editorial 7.5 8.6
User reviews 9.4 9.8
Adoption 5.2 7.5
Affordability 5.0 5.0
Feature breadth 4.0 5.0
Ease of trial 3.0 6.0

Expel vs Huntress: head-to-head

Expel vs Huntress — specs and pricing
ExpelHuntress
Starting price Custom quote Custom quote
Pricing model quote per endpoint
Free trial / tier Free trial
Best for Mid-market/enterprise wanting transparent MDR across their existing tools MSPs and SMBs wanting affordable managed detection with a real human SOC
Deployment Cloud Cloud
G2 rating 4.7/5 (90) 4.9/5 (700)
Capterra rating
Our score 7.5 8.6

Choose Expel if…

You need mid-market/enterprise wanting transparent mdr across their existing tools.

Pros

  • Vendor-agnostic
  • Transparent investigations
  • Strong cloud coverage

Cons

  • Premium pricing
  • Quote-only
  • Enterprise focus

Expel pricing · review

Choose Huntress if…

You need msps and smbs wanting affordable managed detection with a real human soc.

Pros

  • Outstanding SOC + support
  • Built for MSPs/SMB
  • Fast time-to-value

Cons

  • Quote pricing
  • Complements (not replaces) some AV
  • Endpoint-count based

Huntress pricing · review

In depth

Pricing: Huntress vs Expel

Huntress bills on a per endpoint model from Custom quote (yes trial), while Expel uses a quote model from Custom quote. Because the models differ, the cheaper option flips depending on your fleet size — model both at your seat/endpoint count.

Features & deployment

Huntress ships 5 headline capabilities (Managed EDR with 24/7 SOC, Microsoft 365 ITDR, Security awareness training, Ransomware canaries) and deploys Cloud. Expel ships 4 (MDR across cloud + endpoint + SIEM, Transparent workbench, Automation, Clear remediation steps), deploying Cloud.

Ratings & verdict

Huntress holds 4.9/5 (~700 G2 reviews); Expel holds 4.7/5 (~90 G2 reviews). On our data-weighted score, Huntress edges ahead (8.6 vs 7.5/10). Pick Expel instead when mid-market/enterprise wanting transparent mdr across their existing tools. See Huntress alternatives or Expel alternatives.

Frequently asked questions

Expel vs Huntress: which is better?
Expel vs Huntress: on our data-weighted scoring, Huntress edges ahead (8.6 vs 7.5/10). Expel starts at Custom quote and is best for mid-market/enterprise wanting transparent mdr across their existing tools; Huntress starts at Custom quote and is best for msps and smbs wanting affordable managed detection with a real human soc.
Is Expel cheaper than Huntress?
Expel starts at Custom quote and Huntress starts at Custom quote (see the pricing rows for models and limits).
Data as of June 16, 2026. Sources: expel.com, huntress.com. Figures are pulled from public vendor and security data and refreshed automatically.