Huntress
8.6/10
MSP Compared score
- Starting price
- Custom quote
- Reviews
- 4.9/5 (~700 G2 reviews)
- Free trial
- Free trial
- Deployment
- Cloud
- Best for
- MSPs and SMBs wanting affordable managed detection with a real human SOC
Best MDR / XDR Software · 2026
Huntress vs 
Todyl Huntress vs Todyl: on our data-weighted scoring, Huntress edges ahead (8.6 vs 7.7/10). Huntress starts at Custom quote and is best for MSPs and SMBs wanting affordable managed detection with a real human SOC; Todyl starts at Custom quote and is best for MSPs wanting a modular security platform (SASE + EDR + MDR). Choose Huntress for the stronger overall track record; consider Todyl if its pricing model or fit matches your environment better. Side-by-side table below.
Affiliate disclosure: Some links may be affiliate or partner links. If you sign up through one, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. This never changes our scores or rankings. Learn more.
Todyl
7.7/10
MSP Compared score
- Starting price
- Custom quote
- Reviews
- 4.8/5 (~60 G2 reviews)
- Free trial
- —
- Deployment
- Cloud
- Best for
- MSPs wanting a modular security platform (SASE + EDR + MDR)
Strengths at a glance
Six criteria, each scored 0–10 on the same scale from real review data, public pricing and feature coverage. See our methodology →
| Criterion | Huntress | Todyl |
|---|---|---|
| Editorial | 8.6 | 7.7 |
| User reviews | 9.8 | 9.6 |
| Adoption | 7.5 | 4.7 |
| Affordability | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| Feature breadth | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| Ease of trial | 6.0 | 3.0 |
Huntress vs Todyl: head-to-head
| Huntress | Todyl | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Custom quote | Custom quote |
| Pricing model | per endpoint | quote |
| Free trial / tier | Free trial | — |
| Best for | MSPs and SMBs wanting affordable managed detection with a real human SOC | MSPs wanting a modular security platform (SASE + EDR + MDR) |
| Deployment | Cloud | Cloud |
| G2 rating | 4.9/5 (700) | 4.8/5 (60) |
| Capterra rating | — | — |
| Our score | 8.6 | 7.7 |
Choose Huntress if…
You need msps and smbs wanting affordable managed detection with a real human soc.
✓ Pros
- Outstanding SOC + support
- Built for MSPs/SMB
- Fast time-to-value
✕ Cons
- Quote pricing
- Complements (not replaces) some AV
- Endpoint-count based
Choose Todyl if…
You need msps wanting a modular security platform (sase + edr + mdr).
✓ Pros
- Consolidates many tools in one agent
- MSP-focused
- Flexible modules
✕ Cons
- Quote pricing
- Breadth = learning curve
- Younger platform
In depth
Pricing: Huntress vs Todyl
Huntress bills on a per endpoint model from Custom quote (yes trial), while Todyl uses a quote model from Custom quote. Because the models differ, the cheaper option flips depending on your fleet size — model both at your seat/endpoint count.
Features & deployment
Huntress ships 5 headline capabilities (Managed EDR with 24/7 SOC, Microsoft 365 ITDR, Security awareness training, Ransomware canaries) and deploys Cloud. Todyl ships 5 (Single-agent platform, SASE/SSE networking, EDR + MXDR, SIEM), deploying Cloud.
Ratings & verdict
Huntress holds 4.9/5 (~700 G2 reviews); Todyl holds 4.8/5 (~60 G2 reviews). On our data-weighted score, Huntress edges ahead (8.6 vs 7.7/10). Pick Todyl instead when msps wanting a modular security platform (sase + edr + mdr). See Huntress alternatives or Todyl alternatives.
Frequently asked questions
- Huntress vs Todyl: which is better?
- Huntress vs Todyl: on our data-weighted scoring, Huntress edges ahead (8.6 vs 7.7/10). Huntress starts at Custom quote and is best for MSPs and SMBs wanting affordable managed detection with a real human SOC; Todyl starts at Custom quote and is best for MSPs wanting a modular security platform (SASE + EDR + MDR).
- Is Huntress cheaper than Todyl?
- Huntress starts at Custom quote and Todyl starts at Custom quote (see the pricing rows for models and limits).
Data as of November 1, 2026. Sources: huntress.com, todyl.com. Figures are pulled from public vendor and security data and refreshed automatically.