In depth

Pricing

Both platforms use quote-based pricing with no published starting rates, making direct comparison difficult. Huntress employs a per-endpoint model while Todyl offers modular pricing where you select components (SASE, EDR, MXDR, SIEM, GRC). For MSPs managing multiple clients, Huntress’s per-endpoint simplicity may be easier to forecast, while Todyl’s modularity could reduce costs if you don’t need every component.

Features & Deployment

Both are cloud-deployed and MSP-centric, but target different architectural philosophies.

Huntress is a focused EDR + SOC stack:

• 24/7 human-led SOC included
• Microsoft 365 ITDR (identity threat detection)
• Security awareness training
• Ransomware canaries
• Multi-tenant MSP management

Todyl is a convergent security platform:

• Single-agent design spanning SASE, EDR, MXDR, SIEM, and GRC
• Consolidates network security and endpoint detection in one tool
• Reduces agent sprawl but increases feature complexity

Verdict on features: Choose Huntress if you want specialist EDR with exceptional human expertise. Choose Todyl if you need network-plus-endpoint consolidation and can invest time in learning a broader platform.

Ratings & Community Confidence

Huntress has 10x more G2 reviews, signaling stronger market adoption and user feedback. Todyl’s smaller review count reflects its younger status in the market. Both maintain strong scores, but Huntress’s deeper user base and our higher score point to more proven reliability at scale.

Verdict

Huntress wins for MSPs prioritizing guided threat response and affordability—the 24/7 SOC is genuinely differentiated. Pick it if you want managed detection without the headache.

Todyl wins for organizations seeking platform consolidation and willing to trade simplicity for breadth. Pick it if you’re already juggling SASE and EDR tools and want a single-vendor outcome.

For most MSPs: Huntress. The human SOC justifies the choice, and the per-endpoint model scales cleanly.