Malwarebytes ThreatDown
7.8/10
MSP Compared score
- Starting price
- $69/endpoint/yr
- Reviews
- 4.6/5 (~900 G2 reviews)
- Free trial
- Free trial
- Deployment
- Cloud
- Best for
- SMBs/MSPs wanting simple, effective EDR with optional MDR
Best Endpoint Security & EDR Software · 2026
Malwarebytes ThreatDown vs 
ThreatLocker Malwarebytes ThreatDown vs ThreatLocker: on our data-weighted scoring, ThreatLocker edges ahead (8.2 vs 7.8/10). Malwarebytes ThreatDown starts at $69/endpoint/yr and is best for SMBs/MSPs wanting simple, effective EDR with optional MDR; ThreatLocker starts at Custom quote and is best for MSPs wanting Zero Trust allowlisting and ringfencing. Choose ThreatLocker for the stronger overall track record; consider Malwarebytes ThreatDown if its pricing model or fit matches your environment better. Side-by-side table below.
Affiliate disclosure: Some links may be affiliate or partner links. If you sign up through one, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. This never changes our scores or rankings. Learn more.
ThreatLocker
8.2/10
MSP Compared score
- Starting price
- Custom quote
- Reviews
- 4.8/5 (~250 G2 reviews)
- Free trial
- 30 days
- Deployment
- Cloud
- Best for
- MSPs wanting Zero Trust allowlisting and ringfencing
Strengths at a glance
Six criteria, each scored 0–10 on the same scale from real review data, public pricing and feature coverage. See our methodology →
| Criterion | Malwarebytes ThreatDown | ThreatLocker |
|---|---|---|
| Editorial | 7.8 | 8.2 |
| User reviews | 9.2 | 9.6 |
| Adoption | 7.8 | 6.4 |
| Affordability | 2.1 | 5.0 |
| Feature breadth | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| Ease of trial | 6.0 | 6.0 |
Malwarebytes ThreatDown vs ThreatLocker: head-to-head
| Malwarebytes ThreatDown | ThreatLocker | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $69/endpoint/yr | Custom quote |
| Pricing model | per endpoint | quote |
| Free trial / tier | Free trial | 30 days |
| Best for | SMBs/MSPs wanting simple, effective EDR with optional MDR | MSPs wanting Zero Trust allowlisting and ringfencing |
| Deployment | Cloud | Cloud |
| G2 rating | 4.6/5 (900) | 4.8/5 (250) |
| Capterra rating | — | — |
| Our score | 7.8 | 8.2 |
Choose Malwarebytes ThreatDown if…
You need smbs/msps wanting simple, effective edr with optional mdr.
✓ Pros
- Easy to deploy and use
- Great remediation heritage
- Transparent entry price
✕ Cons
- Advanced features need higher tiers
- Reporting basic
- Newer to EDR
Choose ThreatLocker if…
You need msps wanting zero trust allowlisting and ringfencing.
✓ Pros
- Powerful Zero Trust controls
- Excellent support
- Strong MSP fit
✕ Cons
- Allowlisting requires ongoing tuning
- Quote pricing
- Different model than AV/EDR
In depth
Pricing
| Feature | ThreatLocker | Malwarebytes ThreatDown |
|---|---|---|
| Model | Custom quote | Per-endpoint annual |
| Starting Price | Not published | $69/endpoint/yr (Core) |
| Free Trial | 30 days | Yes |
| Free Tier | No | No |
ThreatLocker uses opaque quote-based pricing, which can complicate budgeting but reflects its premium positioning. ThreatDown offers transparent, simple per-endpoint pricing starting at $69/year for basic AV + web protection, with higher tiers unlocking EDR and MDR features. For cost-conscious SMBs, ThreatDown’s entry price is immediately accessible; MSPs needing Zero Trust controls will likely find ThreatLocker’s custom quotes reflect higher feature density.
Features & Deployment
Both deploy cloud-native, but serve different security philosophies:
ThreatLocker emphasizes preventive allowlisting:
- Application allowlisting (whitelist-only model)
- Ringfencing (process isolation)
- Storage & elevation control
- 24/7 “Cyber Hero” support
Malwarebytes ThreatDown emphasizes responsive detection & remediation:
- EDR with ransomware rollback
- Strong malware remediation engine
- Optional managed detection & response (MDR)
- DNS filtering add-on
- Simpler console UX
Deployment verdict: ThreatLocker requires architectural buy-in (allowlisting is a shift from traditional AV). ThreatDown slots into existing AV workflows seamlessly, making it faster to operationalize for SMBs and resource-constrained MSPs.
Ratings & Verdict
| Metric | ThreatLocker | ThreatDown |
|---|---|---|
| G2 Score | 4.8/5 (250 reviews) | 4.6/5 (900 reviews) |
| Our Score | 8.2 | 7.8 |
ThreatLocker edges ahead in raw satisfaction (4.8 vs. 4.6) but from a smaller reviewer base—suggesting concentrated enthusiasm among committed Zero Trust adopters. ThreatDown’s larger review count (900 vs. 250) signals broader market adoption and represents feedback from more diverse deployment sizes.
Pick ThreatLocker if: You’re an MSP or enterprise willing to invest in Zero Trust architecture and ongoing allowlisting tuning for superior threat prevention.
Pick Malwarebytes ThreatDown if: You need fast, affordable EDR deployment with strong remediation and optional MDR, especially for SMBs or MSPs avoiding allowlisting complexity.
Frequently asked questions
- Malwarebytes ThreatDown vs ThreatLocker: which is better?
- Malwarebytes ThreatDown vs ThreatLocker: on our data-weighted scoring, ThreatLocker edges ahead (8.2 vs 7.8/10). Malwarebytes ThreatDown starts at $69/endpoint/yr and is best for SMBs/MSPs wanting simple, effective EDR with optional MDR; ThreatLocker starts at Custom quote and is best for MSPs wanting Zero Trust allowlisting and ringfencing.
- Is Malwarebytes ThreatDown cheaper than ThreatLocker?
- Malwarebytes ThreatDown starts at $69/endpoint/yr and ThreatLocker starts at Custom quote (see the pricing rows for models and limits).
Data as of September 17, 2026. Sources: threatdown.com, threatlocker.com. Figures are pulled from public vendor and security data and refreshed automatically.