Best ZTNA / Business VPN · 2026
Check Point Harmony SASE (Perimeter 81) vs 
Tailscale Check Point Harmony SASE (Perimeter 81) vs Tailscale: on our data-weighted scoring, Tailscale edges ahead (8.4 vs 7.7/10). Check Point Harmony SASE (Perimeter 81) starts at Custom quote and is best for SMB/mid-market teams wanting fast, console-managed SASE without dedicated network engineers; Tailscale starts at $8/user/mo and is best for developer-led teams wanting a zero-config WireGuard mesh with no connector infrastructure. Choose Tailscale for the stronger overall track record; consider Check Point Harmony SASE (Perimeter 81) if its pricing model or fit matches your environment better. Side-by-side table below.
Affiliate disclosure: Some links may be affiliate or partner links. If you sign up through one, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. This never changes our scores or rankings. Learn more.
Six criteria, each scored 0–10 on the same scale from real review data, public pricing and feature coverage. See our methodology →
| Criterion | Check Point Harmony SASE (Perimeter 81) | Tailscale |
|---|---|---|
| Editorial | 7.7 | 8.4 |
| User reviews | 9.2 | 9.4 |
| Adoption | 5.5 | 3.4 |
| Affordability | 5.0 | 9.5 |
| Feature breadth | 6.0 | 6.0 |
| Ease of trial | 3.0 | 10.0 |
| Check Point Harmony SASE (Perimeter 81) | Tailscale | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Custom quote | $8/user/mo |
| Pricing model | quote | per user |
| Free trial / tier | — | Free tier + 14 days |
| Best for | SMB/mid-market teams wanting fast, console-managed SASE without dedicated network engineers | Developer-led teams wanting a zero-config WireGuard mesh with no connector infrastructure |
| Deployment | Cloud | Cloud + self-host |
| G2 rating | 4.6/5 (117) | 4.7/5 (19) |
| Capterra rating | — | — |
| Our score | 7.7 | 8.4 |
You need smb/mid-market teams wanting fast, console-managed sase without dedicated network engineers.
You need developer-led teams wanting a zero-config wireguard mesh with no connector infrastructure.
Tailscale bills on a per user model from $8/user/mo (free tier available), while Check Point Harmony SASE (Perimeter 81) uses a quote model from Custom quote. Because the models differ, the cheaper option flips depending on your fleet size — model both at your seat/endpoint count.
Tailscale ships 6 headline capabilities (WireGuard-based mesh VPN, Zero-config peer-to-peer connectivity, No connector infrastructure, MagicDNS + ACL policies) and deploys Cloud + self-host. Check Point Harmony SASE (Perimeter 81) ships 6 (Cloud-managed SASE + ZTNA, Per-user network segmentation, Dedicated gateways + static IP, Device posture checks), deploying Cloud.
Tailscale holds 4.7/5 (~19 G2 reviews); Check Point Harmony SASE (Perimeter 81) holds 4.6/5 (~117 G2 reviews). On our data-weighted score, Tailscale edges ahead (8.4 vs 7.7/10). Pick Check Point Harmony SASE (Perimeter 81) instead when smb/mid-market teams wanting fast, console-managed sase without dedicated network engineers. See Tailscale alternatives or Check Point Harmony SASE (Perimeter 81) alternatives.
