Best ZTNA / Business VPN · 2026
Check Point Harmony SASE (Perimeter 81) vs 
Twingate Check Point Harmony SASE (Perimeter 81) vs Twingate: on our data-weighted scoring, Twingate edges ahead (8.7 vs 7.7/10). Check Point Harmony SASE (Perimeter 81) starts at Custom quote and is best for SMB/mid-market teams wanting fast, console-managed SASE without dedicated network engineers; Twingate starts at $5/user/mo and is best for teams retiring legacy VPN that want fast, connector-based ZTNA with a free tier. Choose Twingate for the stronger overall track record; consider Check Point Harmony SASE (Perimeter 81) if its pricing model or fit matches your environment better. Side-by-side table below.
Affiliate disclosure: Some links may be affiliate or partner links. If you sign up through one, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. This never changes our scores or rankings. Learn more.
Six criteria, each scored 0–10 on the same scale from real review data, public pricing and feature coverage. See our methodology →
| Criterion | Check Point Harmony SASE (Perimeter 81) | Twingate |
|---|---|---|
| Editorial | 7.7 | 8.7 |
| User reviews | 9.2 | 9.4 |
| Adoption | 5.5 | 4.9 |
| Affordability | 5.0 | 9.5 |
| Feature breadth | 6.0 | 8.0 |
| Ease of trial | 3.0 | 10.0 |
| Check Point Harmony SASE (Perimeter 81) | Twingate | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Custom quote | $5/user/mo |
| Pricing model | quote | per user |
| Free trial / tier | — | Free tier + 14 days |
| Best for | SMB/mid-market teams wanting fast, console-managed SASE without dedicated network engineers | Teams retiring legacy VPN that want fast, connector-based ZTNA with a free tier |
| Deployment | Cloud | Cloud + self-host |
| G2 rating | 4.6/5 (117) | 4.7/5 (69) |
| Capterra rating | — | — |
| Our score | 7.7 | 8.7 |
You need smb/mid-market teams wanting fast, console-managed sase without dedicated network engineers.
You need teams retiring legacy vpn that want fast, connector-based ztna with a free tier.
Twingate bills on a per user model from $5/user/mo (free tier available), while Check Point Harmony SASE (Perimeter 81) uses a quote model from Custom quote. Because the models differ, the cheaper option flips depending on your fleet size — model both at your seat/endpoint count.
Twingate ships 8 headline capabilities (Connector-based ZTNA (resource masking), Free tier up to 5 users, Split tunneling + least-privilege access, IdP integrations (Google) and deploys Cloud + self-host. Check Point Harmony SASE (Perimeter 81) ships 6 (Cloud-managed SASE + ZTNA, Per-user network segmentation, Dedicated gateways + static IP, Device posture checks), deploying Cloud.
Twingate holds 4.7/5 (~69 G2 reviews); Check Point Harmony SASE (Perimeter 81) holds 4.6/5 (~117 G2 reviews). On our data-weighted score, Twingate edges ahead (8.7 vs 7.7/10). Pick Check Point Harmony SASE (Perimeter 81) instead when smb/mid-market teams wanting fast, console-managed sase without dedicated network engineers. See Twingate alternatives or Check Point Harmony SASE (Perimeter 81) alternatives.
