Best ZTNA / Business VPN · 2026
Check Point Harmony SASE (Perimeter 81) vs 
Twingate Check Point Harmony SASE (Perimeter 81) vs Twingate: on our data-weighted scoring, Twingate edges ahead (8.7 vs 7.7/10). Check Point Harmony SASE (Perimeter 81) starts at Custom quote and is best for SMB/mid-market teams wanting fast, console-managed SASE without dedicated network engineers; Twingate starts at $5/user/mo and is best for teams retiring legacy VPN that want fast, connector-based ZTNA with a free tier. Choose Twingate for the stronger overall track record; consider Check Point Harmony SASE (Perimeter 81) if its pricing model or fit matches your environment better. Side-by-side table below.
Six criteria, each scored 0–10 on the same scale from real review data, public pricing and feature coverage. See our methodology →
| Criterion | Check Point Harmony SASE (Perimeter 81) | Twingate |
|---|---|---|
| Editorial | 7.7 | 8.7 |
| User reviews | 9.2 | 9.4 |
| Adoption | 5.5 | 4.9 |
| Affordability | 5.0 | 9.5 |
| Feature breadth | 6.0 | 8.0 |
| Ease of trial | 3.0 | 10.0 |
| Check Point Harmony SASE (Perimeter 81) | Twingate | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Custom quote | $5/user/mo |
| Pricing model | quote | per user |
| Free trial / tier | — | Free tier + 14 days |
| Best for | SMB/mid-market teams wanting fast, console-managed SASE without dedicated network engineers | Teams retiring legacy VPN that want fast, connector-based ZTNA with a free tier |
| Deployment | Cloud | Cloud + self-host |
| G2 rating | 4.6/5 (117) | 4.7/5 (69) |
| Capterra rating | — | — |
| Our score | 7.7 | 8.7 |
You need smb/mid-market teams wanting fast, console-managed sase without dedicated network engineers.
You need teams retiring legacy vpn that want fast, connector-based ztna with a free tier.
Twingate bills on a per user model from $5/user/mo (free tier available), while Check Point Harmony SASE (Perimeter 81) uses a quote model from Custom quote. Because the models differ, the cheaper option flips depending on your fleet size — model both at your seat/endpoint count.
Twingate ships 8 headline capabilities (Connector-based ZTNA (resource masking), Free tier up to 5 users, Split tunneling + least-privilege access, IdP integrations (Google) and deploys Cloud + self-host. Check Point Harmony SASE (Perimeter 81) ships 6 (Cloud-managed SASE + ZTNA, Per-user network segmentation, Dedicated gateways + static IP, Device posture checks), deploying Cloud.
Twingate holds 4.7/5 (~69 G2 reviews); Check Point Harmony SASE (Perimeter 81) holds 4.6/5 (~117 G2 reviews). On our data-weighted score, Twingate edges ahead (8.7 vs 7.7/10). Pick Check Point Harmony SASE (Perimeter 81) instead when smb/mid-market teams wanting fast, console-managed sase without dedicated network engineers. See Twingate alternatives or Check Point Harmony SASE (Perimeter 81) alternatives.
