Best ZTNA / Business VPN · 2026
Check Point Harmony SASE (Perimeter 81) vs 
Zscaler Private Access Check Point Harmony SASE (Perimeter 81) vs Zscaler Private Access: on our data-weighted scoring, Zscaler Private Access edges ahead (7.9 vs 7.7/10). Check Point Harmony SASE (Perimeter 81) starts at Custom quote and is best for SMB/mid-market teams wanting fast, console-managed SASE without dedicated network engineers; Zscaler Private Access starts at Custom quote and is best for enterprises replacing legacy VPN with cloud-delivered, scalable zero-trust access at the largest scale. Choose Zscaler Private Access for the stronger overall track record; consider Check Point Harmony SASE (Perimeter 81) if its pricing model or fit matches your environment better. Side-by-side table below.
Six criteria, each scored 0–10 on the same scale from real review data, public pricing and feature coverage. See our methodology →
| Criterion | Check Point Harmony SASE (Perimeter 81) | Zscaler Private Access |
|---|---|---|
| Editorial | 7.7 | 7.9 |
| User reviews | 9.2 | 9.0 |
| Adoption | 5.5 | 4.8 |
| Affordability | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| Feature breadth | 6.0 | 6.0 |
| Ease of trial | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| Check Point Harmony SASE (Perimeter 81) | Zscaler Private Access | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Custom quote | Custom quote |
| Pricing model | quote | quote |
| Free trial / tier | — | — |
| Best for | SMB/mid-market teams wanting fast, console-managed SASE without dedicated network engineers | Enterprises replacing legacy VPN with cloud-delivered, scalable zero-trust access at the largest scale |
| Deployment | Cloud | Cloud |
| G2 rating | 4.6/5 (117) | 4.5/5 (65) |
| Capterra rating | — | — |
| Our score | 7.7 | 7.9 |
You need smb/mid-market teams wanting fast, console-managed sase without dedicated network engineers.
You need enterprises replacing legacy vpn with cloud-delivered, scalable zero-trust access at the largest scale.
Zscaler Private Access bills on a quote model from Custom quote (no trial), while Check Point Harmony SASE (Perimeter 81) uses a quote model from Custom quote. Because the models differ, the cheaper option flips depending on your fleet size — model both at your seat/endpoint count.
Zscaler Private Access ships 6 headline capabilities (Cloud-delivered ZTNA, App segmentation (apps invisible to internet), No inbound connections / dark cloud, 150+ global data centers) and deploys Cloud. Check Point Harmony SASE (Perimeter 81) ships 6 (Cloud-managed SASE + ZTNA, Per-user network segmentation, Dedicated gateways + static IP, Device posture checks), deploying Cloud.
Zscaler Private Access holds 4.5/5 (~65 G2 reviews); Check Point Harmony SASE (Perimeter 81) holds 4.6/5 (~117 G2 reviews). On our data-weighted score, Zscaler Private Access edges ahead (7.9 vs 7.7/10). Pick Check Point Harmony SASE (Perimeter 81) instead when smb/mid-market teams wanting fast, console-managed sase without dedicated network engineers. See Zscaler Private Access alternatives or Check Point Harmony SASE (Perimeter 81) alternatives.
