Best ZTNA / Business VPN · 2026
Check Point Harmony SASE (Perimeter 81) vs 
Zscaler Private Access Check Point Harmony SASE (Perimeter 81) vs Zscaler Private Access: on our data-weighted scoring, Zscaler Private Access edges ahead (7.9 vs 7.7/10). Check Point Harmony SASE (Perimeter 81) starts at Custom quote and is best for SMB/mid-market teams wanting fast, console-managed SASE without dedicated network engineers; Zscaler Private Access starts at Custom quote and is best for enterprises replacing legacy VPN with cloud-delivered, scalable zero-trust access at the largest scale. Choose Zscaler Private Access for the stronger overall track record; consider Check Point Harmony SASE (Perimeter 81) if its pricing model or fit matches your environment better. Side-by-side table below.
Affiliate disclosure: Some links may be affiliate or partner links. If you sign up through one, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. This never changes our scores or rankings. Learn more.
Six criteria, each scored 0–10 on the same scale from real review data, public pricing and feature coverage. See our methodology →
| Criterion | Check Point Harmony SASE (Perimeter 81) | Zscaler Private Access |
|---|---|---|
| Editorial | 7.7 | 7.9 |
| User reviews | 9.2 | 9.0 |
| Adoption | 5.5 | 4.8 |
| Affordability | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| Feature breadth | 6.0 | 6.0 |
| Ease of trial | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| Check Point Harmony SASE (Perimeter 81) | Zscaler Private Access | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Custom quote | Custom quote |
| Pricing model | quote | quote |
| Free trial / tier | — | — |
| Best for | SMB/mid-market teams wanting fast, console-managed SASE without dedicated network engineers | Enterprises replacing legacy VPN with cloud-delivered, scalable zero-trust access at the largest scale |
| Deployment | Cloud | Cloud |
| G2 rating | 4.6/5 (117) | 4.5/5 (65) |
| Capterra rating | — | — |
| Our score | 7.7 | 7.9 |
You need smb/mid-market teams wanting fast, console-managed sase without dedicated network engineers.
You need enterprises replacing legacy vpn with cloud-delivered, scalable zero-trust access at the largest scale.
Zscaler Private Access bills on a quote model from Custom quote (no trial), while Check Point Harmony SASE (Perimeter 81) uses a quote model from Custom quote. Because the models differ, the cheaper option flips depending on your fleet size — model both at your seat/endpoint count.
Zscaler Private Access ships 6 headline capabilities (Cloud-delivered ZTNA, App segmentation (apps invisible to internet), No inbound connections / dark cloud, 150+ global data centers) and deploys Cloud. Check Point Harmony SASE (Perimeter 81) ships 6 (Cloud-managed SASE + ZTNA, Per-user network segmentation, Dedicated gateways + static IP, Device posture checks), deploying Cloud.
Zscaler Private Access holds 4.5/5 (~65 G2 reviews); Check Point Harmony SASE (Perimeter 81) holds 4.6/5 (~117 G2 reviews). On our data-weighted score, Zscaler Private Access edges ahead (7.9 vs 7.7/10). Pick Check Point Harmony SASE (Perimeter 81) instead when smb/mid-market teams wanting fast, console-managed sase without dedicated network engineers. See Zscaler Private Access alternatives or Check Point Harmony SASE (Perimeter 81) alternatives.
