RustDesk
7.8/10
MSP Compared score
- Starting price
- Free tier available
- Reviews
- Not yet rated
- Free trial
- Free tier
- Deployment
- Self-host
- Best for
- Teams wanting a free, open-source, fully self-hosted remote desktop
Best Remote Access Software · 2026
RustDesk vs 
TeamViewer RustDesk vs TeamViewer: on our data-weighted scoring, TeamViewer edges ahead (8.1 vs 7.8/10). RustDesk starts at Free tier available and is best for teams wanting a free, open-source, fully self-hosted remote desktop; TeamViewer starts at Free tier available and is best for cross-platform remote support with broad device reach. Choose TeamViewer for the stronger overall track record; consider RustDesk if its pricing model or fit matches your environment better. Side-by-side table below.
TeamViewer
8.0/10
MSP Compared score
- Starting price
- Free tier available
- Reviews
- 4.5/5 (~4k G2 reviews)
- Free trial
- Free tier + free trial
- Deployment
- Cloud
- Best for
- Cross-platform remote support with broad device reach
Affiliate links — vendors may pay us a commission. It never affects our data-driven ranking.
Strengths at a glance
Six criteria, each scored 0–10 on the same scale from real review data, public pricing and feature coverage. See our methodology →
| Criterion | RustDesk | TeamViewer |
|---|---|---|
| Editorial | 7.8 | 8.1 |
| User reviews | 7.0 | 9.0 |
| Adoption | 0.0 | 9.5 |
| Affordability | 9.5 | 9.5 |
| Feature breadth | 10.0 | 5.0 |
| Ease of trial | 7.0 | 10.0 |
RustDesk vs TeamViewer: head-to-head
| RustDesk | TeamViewer | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free tier available | Free tier available |
| Pricing model | flat | per license |
| Free trial / tier | Free tier | Free tier + free trial |
| Best for | Teams wanting a free, open-source, fully self-hosted remote desktop | Cross-platform remote support with broad device reach |
| Deployment | Self-host | Cloud |
| G2 rating | — | 4.5/5 (4000) |
| Capterra rating | — | — |
| Our score | 7.8 | 8.1 |
Choose RustDesk if…
You need teams wanting a free, open-source, fully self-hosted remote desktop.
Pros
- Free
- open-source
- fully self-hosted
- No per-tech subscription
- Data never leaves your servers
Cons
- Self-hosting + setup required
- No SOC 2 / formal audit
- Smaller ecosystem + support
Choose TeamViewer if…
You need cross-platform remote support with broad device reach.
Pros
- Works everywhere
- Reliable
- Free personal tier
Cons
- Business pricing high
- Licensing strict
- Quote tiers
In depth
Pricing: TeamViewer vs RustDesk
TeamViewer bills on a per license model from Free tier available (free tier available), while RustDesk uses a flat model from Free tier available (free tier available). Because the models differ, the cheaper option flips depending on your fleet size — model both at your seat/endpoint count.
Features & deployment
TeamViewer ships 5 headline capabilities (Cross-platform remote control, Unattended access, File transfer, Mobile support) and deploys Cloud. RustDesk ships 10 (Open-source self-hosted core (AGPL), Cross-platform (Windows, macOS, Linux), deploying Self-host.
Ratings & verdict
TeamViewer holds 4.5/5 (~4k G2 reviews); RustDesk holds Not yet rated. On our data-weighted score, TeamViewer edges ahead (8.1 vs 8.0/10). Pick RustDesk instead when teams wanting a free, open-source, fully self-hosted remote desktop. See TeamViewer alternatives or RustDesk alternatives.
Frequently asked questions
- RustDesk vs TeamViewer: which is better?
- RustDesk vs TeamViewer: on our data-weighted scoring, TeamViewer edges ahead (8.1 vs 7.8/10). RustDesk starts at Free tier available and is best for teams wanting a free, open-source, fully self-hosted remote desktop; TeamViewer starts at Free tier available and is best for cross-platform remote support with broad device reach.
- Is RustDesk cheaper than TeamViewer?
- RustDesk starts at Free tier available and TeamViewer starts at Free tier available (see the pricing rows for models and limits).
Data as of June 16, 2026. Sources: rustdesk.com, teamviewer.com. Figures are pulled from public vendor and security data and refreshed automatically.