Secureframe
7.9/10
MSP Compared score
- Starting price
- Custom quote
- Reviews
- 4.7/5 (~700 G2 reviews)
- Free trial
- —
- Deployment
- Cloud
- Best for
- Non-technical teams wanting guided, high-touch compliance for complex or multi-cloud setups
Best GRC / Compliance Automation Software · 2026
Secureframe vs 
Vanta Secureframe vs Vanta: on our data-weighted scoring, Vanta edges ahead (8.1 vs 7.9/10). Secureframe starts at Custom quote and is best for non-technical teams wanting guided, high-touch compliance for complex or multi-cloud setups; Vanta starts at Custom quote and is best for startups and scale-ups racing to SOC 2 / ISO 27001 with the widest integration catalog. Choose Vanta for the stronger overall track record; consider Secureframe if its pricing model or fit matches your environment better. Side-by-side table below.
Affiliate disclosure: Some links may be affiliate or partner links. If you sign up through one, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. This never changes our scores or rankings. Learn more.
Vanta
8.1/10
MSP Compared score
- Starting price
- Custom quote
- Reviews
- 4.6/5 (~2.4k G2 reviews)
- Free trial
- —
- Deployment
- Cloud
- Best for
- Startups and scale-ups racing to SOC 2 / ISO 27001 with the widest integration catalog
Strengths at a glance
Six criteria, each scored 0–10 on the same scale from real review data, public pricing and feature coverage. See our methodology →
| Criterion | Secureframe | Vanta |
|---|---|---|
| Editorial | 7.9 | 8.1 |
| User reviews | 9.4 | 9.2 |
| Adoption | 7.5 | 8.9 |
| Affordability | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| Feature breadth | 6.0 | 6.0 |
| Ease of trial | 3.0 | 3.0 |
Secureframe vs Vanta: head-to-head
| Secureframe | Vanta | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Custom quote | Custom quote |
| Pricing model | quote | quote |
| Free trial / tier | — | — |
| Best for | Non-technical teams wanting guided, high-touch compliance for complex or multi-cloud setups | Startups and scale-ups racing to SOC 2 / ISO 27001 with the widest integration catalog |
| Deployment | Cloud | Cloud |
| G2 rating | 4.7/5 (700) | 4.6/5 (2400) |
| Capterra rating | — | — |
| Our score | 7.9 | 8.1 |
Choose Secureframe if…
You need non-technical teams wanting guided, high-touch compliance for complex or multi-cloud setups.
✓ Pros
- Excellent hands-on
- consultant-grade support
- Strong for multi-cloud / complex environments
- Top user satisfaction
✕ Cons
- Quote-only pricing
- Smaller auditor network than Vanta
- Fewer integrations than Vanta
Choose Vanta if…
You need startups and scale-ups racing to soc 2 / iso 27001 with the widest integration catalog.
✓ Pros
- Largest integration catalog
- Strongest brand with auditors and buyers
- Fast time-to-SOC 2
✕ Cons
- Quote-only pricing
- Per-employee cost climbs with headcount
- Add-ons for extra frameworks
In depth
Pricing
Both platforms operate on quote-only models with no published pricing or free tiers. Vanta organizes around frameworks (Essentials → Plus → Professional → Enterprise), while Secureframe structures tiers by feature depth (Fundamentals → Complete → Federal).
| Aspect | Vanta | Secureframe |
|---|---|---|
| Model | Quote-based | Quote-based |
| Free Trial | None | None |
| Entry Tier | Essentials (single framework) | Fundamentals (core monitoring) |
| Scaling Factor | Per-employee headcount | Feature-based bundles |
| Multi-Framework Cost | Add-on fees | Included in Complete tier |
Key difference: Vanta’s cost scales with employee count; Secureframe’s with feature selection. Neither reveals ballpark pricing publicly, making direct comparison difficult without RFPs.
Features & Deployment
Both run on cloud infrastructure with automated evidence collection and AI-powered questionnaires. Vanta leads on breadth; Secureframe on depth.
| Feature | Vanta | Secureframe |
|---|---|---|
| Integrations | 400+ | 300+ |
| Framework Coverage | 35+ | 25+ |
| Automated Evidence | ✓ | ✓ |
| AI Questionnaires | ✓ | ✓ |
| Vendor Risk Management | — | ✓ |
| In-App Security Training | — | ✓ |
| Trust Center | ✓ | ✓ (advanced in Complete) |
| Continuous Monitoring | ✓ | ✓ |
Deployment: Both cloud-only. Vanta’s integration advantage matters most if you run a sprawling SaaS stack; Secureframe’s vendor risk and training modules suit companies managing third-party risk or needing employee compliance education.
Ratings & Verdict
| Platform | G2 Score | Review Count | Our Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Secureframe | 4.7 | 700 | 7.9 |
| Vanta | 4.6 | 2,400 | 8.1 |
Secureframe edges out Vanta on user satisfaction (4.7 vs. 4.6), despite fewer reviews. Vanta’s larger review base and higher our_score reflect market dominance.
Verdict
Choose Vanta if you need to close compliance deals fast, your buyers expect industry-standard tooling, or you run a complex multi-app environment. The 400+ integrations and auditor familiarity justify the quote-and-negotiate dance.
Choose Secureframe if your team lacks compliance depth and you want a partner who acts like a consultant, not a software vendor. Superior support and vendor risk features make it the better fit for complex multi-cloud setups or organizations building security culture alongside compliance.
The tradeoff: Vanta is faster to SOC 2; Secureframe is easier to maintain and govern long-term.
Frequently asked questions
- Secureframe vs Vanta: which is better?
- Secureframe vs Vanta: on our data-weighted scoring, Vanta edges ahead (8.1 vs 7.9/10). Secureframe starts at Custom quote and is best for non-technical teams wanting guided, high-touch compliance for complex or multi-cloud setups; Vanta starts at Custom quote and is best for startups and scale-ups racing to SOC 2 / ISO 27001 with the widest integration catalog.
- Is Secureframe cheaper than Vanta?
- Secureframe starts at Custom quote and Vanta starts at Custom quote (see the pricing rows for models and limits).
Data as of September 14, 2026. Sources: secureframe.com, vanta.com. Figures are pulled from public vendor and security data and refreshed automatically.