Todyl
7.7/10
MSP Compared score
- Starting price
- Custom quote
- Reviews
- 4.8/5 (~60 G2 reviews)
- Free trial
- —
- Deployment
- Cloud
- Best for
- MSPs wanting a modular security platform (SASE + EDR + MDR)
Best SOC-as-a-Service · 2026
Todyl vs 
UnderDefense Todyl vs UnderDefense: on our data-weighted scoring, UnderDefense edges ahead (8.1 vs 7.7/10). Todyl starts at Custom quote and is best for MSPs wanting a modular security platform (SASE + EDR + MDR); UnderDefense starts at $11/endpoint/mo and is best for teams that want an agentic AI SOC on top of the SIEM or XDR they already run. Choose UnderDefense for the stronger overall track record; consider Todyl if its pricing model or fit matches your environment better. Side-by-side table below.
Affiliate disclosure: Some links may be affiliate or partner links. If you sign up through one, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. This never changes our scores or rankings. Learn more.
UnderDefense
8.1/10
MSP Compared score
- Starting price
- $11/endpoint/mo
- Reviews
- 4.9/5 (~29 G2 reviews)
- Free trial
- 14 days
- Deployment
- Cloud + on-prem
- Best for
- Teams that want an agentic AI SOC on top of the SIEM or XDR they already run
Strengths at a glance
Six criteria, each scored 0–10 on the same scale from real review data, public pricing and feature coverage. See our methodology →
| Criterion | Todyl | UnderDefense |
|---|---|---|
| Editorial | 7.7 | 8.1 |
| User reviews | 9.6 | 9.8 |
| Adoption | 4.7 | 3.9 |
| Affordability | 5.0 | 4.1 |
| Feature breadth | 5.0 | 6.0 |
| Ease of trial | 3.0 | 6.0 |
Todyl vs UnderDefense: head-to-head
| Todyl | UnderDefense | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Custom quote | $11/endpoint/mo |
| Pricing model | quote | per endpoint |
| Free trial / tier | — | 14 days |
| Best for | MSPs wanting a modular security platform (SASE + EDR + MDR) | Teams that want an agentic AI SOC on top of the SIEM or XDR they already run |
| Deployment | Cloud | Cloud + on-prem |
| G2 rating | 4.8/5 (60) | 4.9/5 (29) |
| Capterra rating | — | — |
| Our score | 7.7 | 8.1 |
Choose Todyl if…
You need msps wanting a modular security platform (sase + edr + mdr).
✓ Pros
- Consolidates many tools in one agent
- MSP-focused
- Flexible modules
✕ Cons
- Quote pricing
- Breadth = learning curve
- Younger platform
Choose UnderDefense if…
You need teams that want an agentic ai soc on top of the siem or xdr they already run.
✓ Pros
- Published per-endpoint floor (rare in this category)
- Runs on the SIEM/XDR you already own
- 14-day trial
✕ Cons
- G2 volume still small vs Huntress or Arctic Wolf
- Higher tiers are contact-sales
- Annual contracts
In depth
In Depth
Pricing
| Aspect | UnderDefense | Todyl |
|---|---|---|
| Model | Per-endpoint | Quote-based |
| Published Floor | $11/endpoint/mo | None disclosed |
| Billing | Annual contracts | Custom |
| Free Trial | 14 days (up to ~100 employees) | Not specified |
UnderDefense publishes a transparent starting price—rare in the MDR space—making budget forecasting straightforward for smaller orgs. Todyl’s quote model offers flexibility but requires sales conversations upfront. Both tiers beyond entry-level are custom-priced.
Features & Deployment
UnderDefense deploys as a hybrid (cloud + on-prem) AI overlay that bolts onto your existing SIEM or XDR. You keep your current stack and gain agentic AI analysts on top. Key extras: vendor-agnostic connectors, ChatOps (Slack/Teams), managed SIEM, and incident response retainers. This is purpose-built for organizations already invested in other tools.
Todyl is cloud-only and consolidates multiple functions into a single agent: SASE/SSE networking, EDR, MXDR, SIEM, and GRC. The appeal is modular bundling—pick what you need—but it trades deep specialization for breadth. Designed for MSPs seeking an all-in-one platform rather than point solutions.
Winner for multi-tool environments: UnderDefense (sits atop your stack). Winner for consolidated simplicity: Todyl (single agent, fewer integrations to manage).
Ratings
| Source | UnderDefense | Todyl |
|---|---|---|
| G2 Score | 4.9 / 5 | 4.8 / 5 |
| Review Count | 29 | 60 |
| Our Score | 8.1 | 7.7 |
Both are highly rated, though Todyl has more G2 volume. UnderDefense’s smaller but vocal user base reflects its narrower, more specialized use case.
Verdict
UnderDefense is your pick if you already own a SIEM or XDR and want AI-driven SOC automation without rip-and-replace. The $11/endpoint floor signals pricing discipline. Todyl suits MSPs preferring a modular, single-agent consolidation play, accepting opacity in pricing for architectural simplicity. Neither is cheap; UnderDefense is more transparent, Todyl more integrated.
Frequently asked questions
- Todyl vs UnderDefense: which is better?
- Todyl vs UnderDefense: on our data-weighted scoring, UnderDefense edges ahead (8.1 vs 7.7/10). Todyl starts at Custom quote and is best for MSPs wanting a modular security platform (SASE + EDR + MDR); UnderDefense starts at $11/endpoint/mo and is best for teams that want an agentic AI SOC on top of the SIEM or XDR they already run.
- Is Todyl cheaper than UnderDefense?
- Todyl starts at Custom quote and UnderDefense starts at $11/endpoint/mo (see the pricing rows for models and limits).
Data as of September 17, 2026. Sources: todyl.com, underdefense.com. Figures are pulled from public vendor and security data and refreshed automatically.