Action1
8.8/10
MSP Compared score
- Starting price
- $4/endpoint/mo
- Reviews
- 4.8/5 (~300 G2 reviews)
- Free trial
- Free tier + 15-day full trial
- Deployment
- Cloud
- Best for
- SMB and MSP teams whose #1 job is patching (free up to 200 endpoints)
Best Patch Management Software · 2026
Action1 vs 
SuperOps Action1 vs SuperOps: on our data-weighted scoring, Action1 edges ahead (8.8 vs 7.8/10). Action1 starts at $4/endpoint/mo and is best for SMB and MSP teams whose #1 job is patching (free up to 200 endpoints); SuperOps starts at $79/tech/mo and is best for modern MSPs wanting a clean unified RMM+PSA with AI built in. Choose Action1 for the stronger overall track record; consider SuperOps if its pricing model or fit matches your environment better. Side-by-side table below.
Affiliate disclosure: Some links may be affiliate or partner links. If you sign up through one, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. This never changes our scores or rankings. Learn more.
SuperOps
7.8/10
MSP Compared score
- Starting price
- $79/tech/mo
- Reviews
- 4.6/5 (~150 G2 reviews)
- Free trial
- 14 days
- Deployment
- Cloud
- Best for
- Modern MSPs wanting a clean unified RMM+PSA with AI built in
Strengths at a glance
Six criteria, each scored 0–10 on the same scale from real review data, public pricing and feature coverage. See our methodology →
| Criterion | Action1 | SuperOps |
|---|---|---|
| Editorial | 8.8 | 7.8 |
| User reviews | 9.6 | 9.2 |
| Adoption | 6.6 | 5.8 |
| Affordability | 9.5 | 1.8 |
| Feature breadth | 6.0 | 5.0 |
| Ease of trial | 10.0 | 6.0 |
Action1 vs SuperOps: head-to-head
| Action1 | SuperOps | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $4/endpoint/mo | $79/tech/mo |
| Pricing model | per endpoint | per technician |
| Free trial / tier | Free tier + 15-day full trial | 14 days |
| Best for | SMB and MSP teams whose #1 job is patching (free up to 200 endpoints) | Modern MSPs wanting a clean unified RMM+PSA with AI built in |
| Deployment | Cloud | Cloud |
| G2 rating | 4.8/5 (300) | 4.6/5 (150) |
| Capterra rating | — | — |
| Our score | 8.8 | 7.8 |
Choose Action1 if…
You need smb and msp teams whose #1 job is patching (free up to 200 endpoints).
✓ Pros
- Genuinely free up to 200 endpoints with no feature gating
- Cloud-native — no on-prem servers
- Strong third-party app catalog
✕ Cons
- Windows-first (limited macOS depth)
- Support is a separate paid add-on on Growth
- Scales by endpoint count
Choose SuperOps if…
You need modern msps wanting a clean unified rmm+psa with ai built in.
✓ Pros
- Modern UX
- AI features
- Good value for new MSPs
✕ Cons
- Younger ecosystem
- Fewer integrations than incumbents
- Module pricing
In depth
In Depth
Pricing
| Aspect | Action1 | SuperOps |
|---|---|---|
| Model | Per-endpoint | Per-technician |
| Starting Price | $0 (free) / $4/endpoint/mo | $79/tech/mo |
| Free Tier | Yes—200 endpoints, all features | No—14-day trial only |
| Best For | Small teams or budget-conscious shops | Established MSPs scaling unified ops |
Action1 wins decisively on affordability and entry barrier. The free tier is genuinely unlimited (200 endpoints covers most SMBs), with no feature gating—a rarity in patch management. SuperOps charges per technician, a model that penalizes growth differently but bundles more operational tools upfront. If patching is your primary need, Action1 is 10–50× cheaper at scale; if you want integrated PSA+RMM, SuperOps justifies its per-tech cost.
Deployment & Architecture
Both are cloud-native, eliminating on-premises overhead. Action1 focuses narrowly on patch + vulnerability management; SuperOps is a platform play, bundling RMM, PSA, project tracking, and AI. Action1’s peer-to-peer patch distribution reduces bandwidth strain—relevant for distributed teams. SuperOps emphasizes modern UX and AI-assisted workflows, appealing to MSPs tired of legacy interfaces.
Features
Action1 is laser-focused:
- OS + third-party app patching (deep catalog)
- Risk-based prioritization (CVE/CVSS/CISA KEV)
- Remote access and automated remediation
- Vulnerability scanning
SuperOps is broader but younger:
- Unified RMM + PSA in one console
- AI-assisted operations
- Patch management (present but not specialized)
- Project and asset management
Action1 is the better patch specialist; SuperOps is the better operations hub.
Ratings & Trust
| Platform | Score | Reviews |
|---|---|---|
| Action1 (G2) | 4.8/5 | 300 |
| SuperOps (G2) | 4.6/5 | 150 |
Action1’s higher score and 2× review volume reflect maturity and customer satisfaction in its niche. SuperOps’ respectable 4.6 reflects a younger but growing user base; fewer reviews suggest less market penetration.
Verdict
Choose Action1 if patching and vulnerability management are your core problem, you have <1,000 endpoints, or budget is tight. Its free tier is unmatched, and it outperforms SuperOps on CVE prioritization and third-party app coverage.
Choose SuperOps if you’re an MSP needing unified RMM+PSA, want modern AI-driven workflows, and can absorb $79/tech/mo. You’re paying for breadth and UX, not patch depth.
| Dimension | Winner |
|---|---|
| Price sensitivity | Action1 |
| Patch depth | Action1 |
| Platform consolidation | SuperOps |
| Ease of use | SuperOps |
| Maturity | Action1 |
Frequently asked questions
- Action1 vs SuperOps: which is better?
- Action1 vs SuperOps: on our data-weighted scoring, Action1 edges ahead (8.8 vs 7.8/10). Action1 starts at $4/endpoint/mo and is best for SMB and MSP teams whose #1 job is patching (free up to 200 endpoints); SuperOps starts at $79/tech/mo and is best for modern MSPs wanting a clean unified RMM+PSA with AI built in.
- Is Action1 cheaper than SuperOps?
- Action1 starts at $4/endpoint/mo and SuperOps starts at $79/tech/mo (see the pricing rows for models and limits).
Data as of September 17, 2026. Sources: action1.com, superops.com. Figures are pulled from public vendor and security data and refreshed automatically.