Atera
8.2/10
MSP Compared score
- Starting price
- $129/tech/mo
- Reviews
- 4.6/5 (~800 G2 reviews)
- Free trial
- 30 days
- Deployment
- Cloud
- Best for
- Lean MSPs and IT teams wanting all-in-one RMM+PSA at a flat per-tech price
Best RMM Software · 2026
Atera vs 
Kaseya BMS Atera vs Kaseya BMS: on our data-weighted scoring, Atera edges ahead (8.2 vs 7.4/10). Atera starts at $129/tech/mo and is best for lean MSPs and IT teams wanting all-in-one RMM+PSA at a flat per-tech price; Kaseya BMS starts at Custom quote and is best for cost-conscious small-to-mid MSPs wanting a PSA inside the Kaseya ecosystem (VSA, IT Glue). Choose Atera for the stronger overall track record; consider Kaseya BMS if its pricing model or fit matches your environment better. Side-by-side table below.
Affiliate disclosure: Some links may be affiliate or partner links. If you sign up through one, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. This never changes our scores or rankings. Learn more.
Kaseya BMS
7.4/10
MSP Compared score
- Starting price
- Custom quote
- Reviews
- 4.3/5 (~40 G2 reviews)
- Free trial
- Free trial
- Deployment
- Cloud
- Best for
- Cost-conscious small-to-mid MSPs wanting a PSA inside the Kaseya ecosystem (VSA, IT Glue)
Strengths at a glance
Six criteria, each scored 0–10 on the same scale from real review data, public pricing and feature coverage. See our methodology →
| Criterion | Atera | Kaseya BMS |
|---|---|---|
| Editorial | 8.2 | 7.4 |
| User reviews | 9.2 | 8.6 |
| Adoption | 7.7 | 4.3 |
| Affordability | 1.2 | 5.0 |
| Feature breadth | 6.0 | 6.0 |
| Ease of trial | 6.0 | 6.0 |
Atera vs Kaseya BMS: head-to-head
| Atera | Kaseya BMS | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $129/tech/mo | Custom quote |
| Pricing model | per technician | quote |
| Free trial / tier | 30 days | Free trial |
| Best for | Lean MSPs and IT teams wanting all-in-one RMM+PSA at a flat per-tech price | Cost-conscious small-to-mid MSPs wanting a PSA inside the Kaseya ecosystem (VSA, IT Glue) |
| Deployment | Cloud | Cloud |
| G2 rating | 4.6/5 (800) | 4.3/5 (40) |
| Capterra rating | 4.6/5 (400) | — |
| Our score | 8.2 | 7.4 |
Choose Atera if…
You need lean msps and it teams wanting all-in-one rmm+psa at a flat per-tech price.
✓ Pros
- Per-technician pricing = predictable cost
- Unlimited endpoints
- All-in-one for small MSPs
✕ Cons
- Per-tech model pricey for few-tech/many-device shops
- Add-ons (Copilot
- network discovery) cost extra
- Less depth than enterprise RMM
Choose Kaseya BMS if…
You need cost-conscious small-to-mid msps wanting a psa inside the kaseya ecosystem (vsa, it glue).
✓ Pros
- Cheaper than ConnectWise PSA / Autotask
- Tight Kaseya/IT Glue integration
- Solid review scores
✕ Cons
- Quote-only
- no public list pricing
- Multi-year terms + auto-renewal complaints
- PSA depth below ConnectWise
In depth
In Depth
Pricing
| Aspect | Atera | Kaseya BMS |
|---|---|---|
| Model | Per-technician (annual) | Per-user (quote-based) |
| Starting Price | $129/tech/mo ($1,548/year) | Not published |
| Free Trial | 30 days | Yes |
| Tier Range | Pro ($129) → Superpower (custom) | Single tier, custom pricing |
| Device Limit | Unlimited | Not specified |
| Transparency | Clear public pricing | Sales-quoted only |
The tradeoff: Atera’s per-technician model is predictable and suitable for MSPs with many endpoints but few staff. Kaseya BMS’s opaque pricing favors larger deployments but makes budget planning difficult upfront. If you need to estimate costs quickly, Atera wins; if you’re already in the Kaseya ecosystem, BMS pricing may come in lower.
Features & Deployment
Both run on cloud infrastructure. The feature gap reflects their positioning:
Atera bundles RMM + PSA + helpdesk, making it a genuine all-in-one. Remote access is powered by Splashtop; patch management and AI Copilot are included (the latter as an add-on).
Kaseya BMS is PSA-focused—ticketing, billing automation, project management, CRM, and time tracking. Its strength is ecosystem lock-in: native integration with Kaseya VSA (RMM) and IT Glue (documentation) means fewer middleware headaches for shops already committed to Kaseya.
Deployment reality: Atera is self-contained; BMS is designed to complement Kaseya’s RMM layer. If you need RMM + PSA under one roof without integration friction, Atera is simpler. If you’re standardizing on Kaseya, BMS is purpose-built for that ecosystem.
Ratings & Verdict
| Platform | G2 Score | Review Count | Capterra |
|---|---|---|---|
| Atera | 4.6/5 | 800 | 4.6/5 (400) |
| Kaseya BMS | 4.3/5 | 40 | — |
| Our Score | — | — | Atera 8.2, BMS 7.4 |
Atera’s higher volume of reviews and consistent 4.6 rating across platforms signals broader adoption and user satisfaction. Kaseya BMS’s smaller review base (40 G2 reviews) limits statistical confidence, though its 4.3 score is still solid.
Verdict:
-
Choose Atera if you’re a lean MSP wanting transparent, per-tech pricing and a unified RMM+PSA platform without integrations. The unlimited-devices model rewards high-density customer bases.
-
Choose Kaseya BMS if you’re already committed to Kaseya VSA and IT Glue—the PSA is competent and cheaper than ConnectWise, but demand a firm, itemized quote and scrutinize contract auto-renewal language before signing.
Bottom line: Atera is the easier, more predictable choice for small MSPs seeking independence. Kaseya BMS is the pragmatic choice if ecosystem consolidation matters more than pricing transparency.
Frequently asked questions
- Atera vs Kaseya BMS: which is better?
- Atera vs Kaseya BMS: on our data-weighted scoring, Atera edges ahead (8.2 vs 7.4/10). Atera starts at $129/tech/mo and is best for lean MSPs and IT teams wanting all-in-one RMM+PSA at a flat per-tech price; Kaseya BMS starts at Custom quote and is best for cost-conscious small-to-mid MSPs wanting a PSA inside the Kaseya ecosystem (VSA, IT Glue).
- Is Atera cheaper than Kaseya BMS?
- Atera starts at $129/tech/mo and Kaseya BMS starts at Custom quote (see the pricing rows for models and limits).
Data as of September 17, 2026. Sources: atera.com, kaseya.com. Figures are pulled from public vendor and security data and refreshed automatically.