Automox
7.7/10
MSP Compared score
- Starting price
- $3/endpoint/mo
- Reviews
- 4.5/5 (~90 G2 reviews)
- Free trial
- 14 days
- Deployment
- Cloud
- Best for
- Cloud-native cross-OS patch + config automation for lean IT teams
Best Patch Management Software · 2026
Automox vs 
PDQ Connect Automox vs PDQ Connect: on our data-weighted scoring, Automox edges ahead (7.7 vs 7.5/10). Automox starts at $3/endpoint/mo and is best for cloud-native cross-OS patch + config automation for lean IT teams; PDQ Connect starts at Custom quote and is best for teams that want PDQ's deployment power for remote/cloud-managed devices. Choose Automox for the stronger overall track record; consider PDQ Connect if its pricing model or fit matches your environment better. Side-by-side table below.
Affiliate disclosure: Some links may be affiliate or partner links. If you sign up through one, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. This never changes our scores or rankings. Learn more.
PDQ Connect
7.5/10
MSP Compared score
- Starting price
- Custom quote
- Reviews
- 4.6/5 (~40 G2 reviews)
- Free trial
- 14 days
- Deployment
- Cloud
- Best for
- Teams that want PDQ's deployment power for remote/cloud-managed devices
Strengths at a glance
Six criteria, each scored 0–10 on the same scale from real review data, public pricing and feature coverage. See our methodology →
| Criterion | Automox | PDQ Connect |
|---|---|---|
| Editorial | 7.7 | 7.5 |
| User reviews | 9.0 | 9.2 |
| Adoption | 5.2 | 4.3 |
| Affordability | 7.6 | 5.0 |
| Feature breadth | 5.0 | 4.0 |
| Ease of trial | 6.0 | 6.0 |
Automox vs PDQ Connect: head-to-head
| Automox | PDQ Connect | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $3/endpoint/mo | Custom quote |
| Pricing model | per endpoint | per device |
| Free trial / tier | 14 days | 14 days |
| Best for | Cloud-native cross-OS patch + config automation for lean IT teams | Teams that want PDQ's deployment power for remote/cloud-managed devices |
| Deployment | Cloud | Cloud |
| G2 rating | 4.5/5 (90) | 4.6/5 (40) |
| Capterra rating | — | — |
| Our score | 7.7 | 7.5 |
Choose Automox if…
You need cloud-native cross-os patch + config automation for lean it teams.
✓ Pros
- True cross-OS parity
- No on-prem infrastructure
- Flexible automation via Worklets
✕ Cons
- No free tier
- Per-endpoint cost adds up
- Reporting depth trails enterprise suites
Choose PDQ Connect if…
You need teams that want pdq's deployment power for remote/cloud-managed devices.
✓ Pros
- Cloud version of PDQ's strong deployment engine
- Manages remote devices
- Simple agent
✕ Cons
- Newer than Deploy
- Windows-focused
- Per-device pricing
In depth
In Depth
Pricing
| Aspect | Automox | PDQ Connect |
|---|---|---|
| Model | Per-endpoint/month | Per-device/month |
| Starting Price | $3/endpoint/mo | Custom quote |
| Free Tier | No | No |
| Free Trial | 14 days | 14 days |
| Billing | Annual | Annual |
Automox offers transparent, predictable per-endpoint pricing with two tiers: Manage ($3) for core patching and Secure ($5) for vulnerability remediation. PDQ Connect requires a quote, making cost comparison difficult upfront—typical for their sales model but less transparent for budget planning.
For teams with 100+ endpoints, Automox’s $3 starting point becomes attractive; however, the $5 Secure tier cost compounds quickly at scale. PDQ Connect’s silence on pricing suggests enterprise negotiation, which may yield better rates for large deployments.
Features & Deployment
Automox embraces cloud-native architecture with no on-premises infrastructure required. It delivers genuine cross-OS support (Windows, macOS, Linux) with third-party app patching and Worklets for custom automation. Configuration management rounds out the offering, appealing to teams seeking unified patch + config across heterogeneous environments.
PDQ Connect is an agent-based cloud wrapper around PDQ’s proven deployment engine. It excels at custom deployments and off-network device management but remains Windows-centric. Inventory and reporting are solid, though the offering feels narrower than Automox for mixed-OS shops.
Verdict: Automox wins for multi-OS environments and agentless simplicity; PDQ Connect suits Windows-heavy teams leveraging PDQ’s deployment customization.
Ratings & Our Verdict
| Platform | G2 Score | Review Count |
|---|---|---|
| Automox | 4.5/5 | 90 reviews |
| PDQ Connect | 4.6/5 | 40 reviews |
Both score well on G2, though Automox’s 90 reviews suggest broader market traction. PDQ Connect’s smaller sample reflects its relative newness.
Our Scores: Automox 7.7 | PDQ Connect 7.5
Bottom Line: Choose Automox for cloud-native, cross-OS simplicity and transparent pricing in lean IT orgs. Choose PDQ Connect if you’re already invested in PDQ’s deployment ecosystem and manage primarily Windows remotely. Automox’s lack of per-endpoint friction and no-agent architecture gives it an edge for modern, distributed teams.
Frequently asked questions
- Automox vs PDQ Connect: which is better?
- Automox vs PDQ Connect: on our data-weighted scoring, Automox edges ahead (7.7 vs 7.5/10). Automox starts at $3/endpoint/mo and is best for cloud-native cross-OS patch + config automation for lean IT teams; PDQ Connect starts at Custom quote and is best for teams that want PDQ's deployment power for remote/cloud-managed devices.
- Is Automox cheaper than PDQ Connect?
- Automox starts at $3/endpoint/mo and PDQ Connect starts at Custom quote (see the pricing rows for models and limits).
Data as of September 17, 2026. Sources: automox.com, pdq.com. Figures are pulled from public vendor and security data and refreshed automatically.