Bitdefender GravityZone
8.1/10
MSP Compared score
- Starting price
- Custom quote
- Reviews
- 4.6/5 (~400 G2 reviews)
- Free trial
- 30 days
- Deployment
- Cloud + on-prem
- Best for
- SMBs and MSPs wanting strong protection at a fair price
Best Endpoint Security & EDR Software · 2026
Bitdefender GravityZone vs 
ESET PROTECT Bitdefender GravityZone vs ESET PROTECT: on our data-weighted scoring, Bitdefender GravityZone edges ahead (8.1 vs 7.9/10). Bitdefender GravityZone starts at Custom quote and is best for SMBs and MSPs wanting strong protection at a fair price; ESET PROTECT starts at Custom quote and is best for teams wanting lightweight, reliable endpoint protection. Choose Bitdefender GravityZone for the stronger overall track record; consider ESET PROTECT if its pricing model or fit matches your environment better. Side-by-side table below.
Affiliate disclosure: Some links may be affiliate or partner links. If you sign up through one, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. This never changes our scores or rankings. Learn more.
ESET PROTECT
7.9/10
MSP Compared score
- Starting price
- Custom quote
- Reviews
- 4.6/5 (~800 G2 reviews)
- Free trial
- 30 days
- Deployment
- Cloud + on-prem
- Best for
- Teams wanting lightweight, reliable endpoint protection
Strengths at a glance
Six criteria, each scored 0–10 on the same scale from real review data, public pricing and feature coverage. See our methodology →
| Criterion | Bitdefender GravityZone | ESET PROTECT |
|---|---|---|
| Editorial | 8.1 | 7.9 |
| User reviews | 9.2 | 9.2 |
| Adoption | 6.9 | 7.7 |
| Affordability | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| Feature breadth | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| Ease of trial | 6.0 | 6.0 |
Bitdefender GravityZone vs ESET PROTECT: head-to-head
| Bitdefender GravityZone | ESET PROTECT | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Custom quote | Custom quote |
| Pricing model | per device | per device |
| Free trial / tier | 30 days | 30 days |
| Best for | SMBs and MSPs wanting strong protection at a fair price | Teams wanting lightweight, reliable endpoint protection |
| Deployment | Cloud + on-prem | Cloud + on-prem |
| G2 rating | 4.6/5 (400) | 4.6/5 (800) |
| Capterra rating | — | — |
| Our score | 8.1 | 7.9 |
Choose Bitdefender GravityZone if…
You need smbs and msps wanting strong protection at a fair price.
✓ Pros
- Excellent independent AV test scores
- Affordable
- Good MSP program
✕ Cons
- EDR is a higher tier
- Console can feel dense
- Per-device tiers
Choose ESET PROTECT if…
You need teams wanting lightweight, reliable endpoint protection.
✓ Pros
- Very light agent
- Reliable detection
- Flexible deployment
✕ Cons
- EDR is higher tier
- Quote pricing
- Smaller US channel
In depth
Pricing
Both solutions use per-device annual billing with 30-day free trials and no free tier.
| Aspect | Bitdefender GravityZone | ESET PROTECT |
|---|---|---|
| Model | Per-device/year | Per-device/year |
| Starting Price | ~$77/yr (3 devices) | Custom quote |
| Tiers | Business Security; Business Security Premium (with EDR) | Standard; Inspect (with EDR) |
| MSP Billing | Monthly options available | Quote-based |
Bitdefender offers transparent, published pricing starting around $77/device/year for entry-level protection. ESET requires quote requests, making budget planning harder upfront—though their lightweight architecture may justify higher per-device costs for resource-constrained environments.
Features & Deployment
Both deploy as cloud + on-premise solutions.
| Feature | Bitdefender | ESET |
|---|---|---|
| AV Engine | Top-rated, heavy-hitting | Lightweight, efficient |
| EDR/XDR | Premium tier (XDR available) | Inspect tier only |
| Encryption | Add-on | Included in platform |
| Resource Footprint | Standard | Minimal |
| Console | Feature-rich but dense | Cloud-native, clean UI |
Bitdefender bundles risk analytics and patch management as add-ons, suiting organizations needing comprehensive posture management. ESET prioritizes simplicity and low overhead—ideal for lean IT teams or systems with tight resource budgets. Neither includes EDR in base tiers, forcing tier upgrades for advanced threat hunting.
Ratings & Verdict
| Metric | Bitdefender | ESET |
|---|---|---|
| G2 Score | 4.6/5 (400 reviews) | 4.6/5 (800 reviews) |
| Our Score | 8.1/10 | 7.9/10 |
Both earn identical G2 ratings, but ESET’s larger review base (800 vs. 400) suggests broader enterprise adoption. Bitdefender edges ahead with independent AV test prestige and MSP-friendly monthly billing.
Choose Bitdefender GravityZone if you need transparent pricing, advanced analytics, and strong MSP support. Choose ESET PROTECT if you prioritize agent lightness, included encryption, and can navigate custom quoting for budget predictability. For most SMBs, Bitdefender’s published pricing and feature depth offer better value; ESET wins for resource-constrained or minimalist security teams.
Frequently asked questions
- Bitdefender GravityZone vs ESET PROTECT: which is better?
- Bitdefender GravityZone vs ESET PROTECT: on our data-weighted scoring, Bitdefender GravityZone edges ahead (8.1 vs 7.9/10). Bitdefender GravityZone starts at Custom quote and is best for SMBs and MSPs wanting strong protection at a fair price; ESET PROTECT starts at Custom quote and is best for teams wanting lightweight, reliable endpoint protection.
- Is Bitdefender GravityZone cheaper than ESET PROTECT?
- Bitdefender GravityZone starts at Custom quote and ESET PROTECT starts at Custom quote (see the pricing rows for models and limits).
Data as of September 17, 2026. Sources: bitdefender.com, eset.com. Figures are pulled from public vendor and security data and refreshed automatically.