Best Endpoint Security & EDR Software · 2026

Cisco Secure Endpoint logoCisco Secure Endpoint vs ESET PROTECT logoESET PROTECT

Cisco Secure Endpoint vs ESET PROTECT: on our data-weighted scoring, ESET PROTECT edges ahead (7.9 vs 7.4/10). Cisco Secure Endpoint starts at Custom quote and is best for cisco-centric enterprises wanting integrated EDR; ESET PROTECT starts at Custom quote and is best for teams wanting lightweight, reliable endpoint protection. Choose ESET PROTECT for the stronger overall track record; consider Cisco Secure Endpoint if its pricing model or fit matches your environment better. Side-by-side table below.

Affiliate disclosure: Some links may be affiliate or partner links. If you sign up through one, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. This never changes our scores or rankings. Learn more.

Cisco Secure Endpoint

7.4/10
MSP Compared score
Starting price
Custom quote
Reviews
4.4/5 (~150 G2 reviews)
Free trial
Free trial
Deployment
Cloud
Best for
Cisco-centric enterprises wanting integrated EDR
Visit Cisco Secure Endpoint →
Our pick

ESET PROTECT

7.9/10
MSP Compared score
Starting price
Custom quote
Reviews
4.6/5 (~800 G2 reviews)
Free trial
30 days
Deployment
Cloud + on-prem
Best for
Teams wanting lightweight, reliable endpoint protection
Visit ESET PROTECT →

Strengths at a glance

Six criteria, each scored 0–10 on the same scale from real review data, public pricing and feature coverage. See our methodology →

EditorialUser reviewsAdoptionAffordabilityFeature breadthEase of trial
Cisco Secure EndpointESET PROTECT
CriterionCisco Secure EndpointESET PROTECT
Editorial 7.4 7.9
User reviews 8.8 9.2
Adoption 5.8 7.7
Affordability 5.0 5.0
Feature breadth 4.0 5.0
Ease of trial 6.0 6.0

Cisco Secure Endpoint vs ESET PROTECT: head-to-head

Cisco Secure Endpoint vs ESET PROTECT — specs and pricing
Cisco Secure EndpointESET PROTECT
Starting price Custom quote Custom quote
Pricing model quote per device
Free trial / tier Free trial 30 days
Best for Cisco-centric enterprises wanting integrated EDR Teams wanting lightweight, reliable endpoint protection
Deployment Cloud Cloud + on-prem
G2 rating 4.4/5 (150) 4.6/5 (800)
Capterra rating
Our score 7.4 7.9

Choose Cisco Secure Endpoint if…

You need cisco-centric enterprises wanting integrated edr.

Pros

  • Talos threat intelligence
  • Integrates with Cisco stack
  • Solid detection

Cons

  • Best within Cisco ecosystem
  • Quote pricing
  • Heavier admin

Cisco Secure Endpoint pricing · review

Choose ESET PROTECT if…

You need teams wanting lightweight, reliable endpoint protection.

Pros

  • Very light agent
  • Reliable detection
  • Flexible deployment

Cons

  • EDR is higher tier
  • Quote pricing
  • Smaller US channel

ESET PROTECT pricing · review

In depth

In Depth

Pricing

Both solutions use quote-based pricing with no published per-device rates, making direct cost comparison difficult. ESET PROTECT operates on a per-device model and offers a 30-day free trial, while Cisco Secure Endpoint is cloud-only and provides trial access but requires contacting sales for pricing. Neither offers a free tier.

Key difference: ESET’s lighter agent footprint typically translates to lower TCO for large deployments, whereas Cisco’s pricing often includes broader integration benefits if you’re already invested in their security stack.

Features & Deployment

FeatureESET PROTECTCisco Secure Endpoint
DeploymentCloud + on-premCloud only
Core EDRInspect (higher tier)Built-in with Talos
Full-disk encryption
Threat hunting
Sandboxing
XDR/SecureX integration

ESET PROTECT excels at lightweight protection with optional EDR add-ons and supports hybrid deployments. Cisco Secure Endpoint is EDR-native, bundled with industry-leading Talos threat intelligence and SecureX platform integration—valuable if you’re standardizing on Cisco.

Ratings & Verdict

G2 Community Scores:

  • ESET PROTECT: 4.6/5 (800 reviews) — higher volume, consistent praise for reliability and efficiency
  • Cisco Secure Endpoint: 4.4/5 (150 reviews) — smaller user base, strong marks for detection and ecosystem fit

Our Score: ESET PROTECT (7.9) edges out Cisco (7.4).

Verdict: Choose ESET PROTECT if you need a lightweight, flexible solution with strong detection and multi-deployment options. Choose Cisco Secure Endpoint if you’re a Cisco-centric enterprise that values integrated EDR, threat hunting, and unified XDR visibility. ESET wins on resource efficiency and deployment flexibility; Cisco wins on integrated intelligence and threat response depth.

Frequently asked questions

Cisco Secure Endpoint vs ESET PROTECT: which is better?
Cisco Secure Endpoint vs ESET PROTECT: on our data-weighted scoring, ESET PROTECT edges ahead (7.9 vs 7.4/10). Cisco Secure Endpoint starts at Custom quote and is best for cisco-centric enterprises wanting integrated EDR; ESET PROTECT starts at Custom quote and is best for teams wanting lightweight, reliable endpoint protection.
Is Cisco Secure Endpoint cheaper than ESET PROTECT?
Cisco Secure Endpoint starts at Custom quote and ESET PROTECT starts at Custom quote (see the pricing rows for models and limits).
Data as of September 17, 2026. Sources: cisco.com, eset.com. Figures are pulled from public vendor and security data and refreshed automatically.