Cisco Secure Endpoint
7.9/10
MSP Compared score
- Starting price
- Custom quote
- Reviews
- 4.4/5 (~150 G2 reviews)
- Free trial
- Free trial
- Deployment
- Cloud
- Best for
- Cisco-centric enterprises wanting integrated EDR
Best Endpoint Security & EDR Software · 2026
Cisco Secure Endpoint vs 
ESET PROTECT Cisco Secure Endpoint vs ESET PROTECT: on our data-weighted scoring, ESET PROTECT edges ahead (7.9 vs 7.4/10). Cisco Secure Endpoint starts at Custom quote and is best for cisco-centric enterprises wanting integrated edr; ESET PROTECT starts at Custom quote and is best for teams wanting lightweight, reliable endpoint protection. Choose ESET PROTECT for the stronger overall track record; consider Cisco Secure Endpoint if its pricing model or fit matches your environment better. Side-by-side table below.
ESET PROTECT
8.3/10
MSP Compared score
- Starting price
- Custom quote
- Reviews
- 4.6/5 (~800 G2 reviews)
- Free trial
- 30 days
- Deployment
- Cloud + on-prem
- Best for
- Teams wanting lightweight, reliable endpoint protection
Affiliate links — vendors may pay us a commission. It never affects our data-driven ranking.
Strengths at a glance
Six criteria, each scored 0–10 on the same scale from real review data, public pricing and feature coverage. See our methodology →
| Criterion | Cisco Secure Endpoint | ESET PROTECT |
|---|---|---|
| Editorial | 7.4 | 7.9 |
| User reviews | 8.8 | 9.2 |
| Adoption | 5.8 | 7.7 |
| Affordability | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| Feature breadth | 4.0 | 5.0 |
| Ease of trial | 6.0 | 6.0 |
Cisco Secure Endpoint vs ESET PROTECT: head-to-head
| Cisco Secure Endpoint | ESET PROTECT | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Custom quote | Custom quote |
| Pricing model | quote | per device |
| Free trial / tier | Free trial | 30 days |
| Best for | Cisco-centric enterprises wanting integrated EDR | Teams wanting lightweight, reliable endpoint protection |
| Deployment | Cloud | Cloud + on-prem |
| G2 rating | 4.4/5 (150) | 4.6/5 (800) |
| Capterra rating | — | — |
| Our score | 7.4 | 7.9 |
Choose Cisco Secure Endpoint if…
You need cisco-centric enterprises wanting integrated edr.
Pros
- Talos threat intelligence
- Integrates with Cisco stack
- Solid detection
Cons
- Best within Cisco ecosystem
- Quote pricing
- Heavier admin
Choose ESET PROTECT if…
You need teams wanting lightweight, reliable endpoint protection.
Pros
- Very light agent
- Reliable detection
- Flexible deployment
Cons
- EDR is higher tier
- Quote pricing
- Smaller US channel
In depth
Pricing: ESET PROTECT vs Cisco Secure Endpoint
ESET PROTECT bills on a per device model from Custom quote (30 days trial), while Cisco Secure Endpoint uses a quote model from Custom quote (yes trial). Because the models differ, the cheaper option flips depending on your fleet size — model both at your seat/endpoint count.
Features & deployment
ESET PROTECT ships 5 headline capabilities (Lightweight AV, EDR (Inspect), Full-disk encryption, Cloud console) and deploys Cloud + on-prem. Cisco Secure Endpoint ships 4 (EDR with Talos intel, SecureX/XDR integration, Threat hunting, Sandboxing), deploying Cloud.
Ratings & verdict
ESET PROTECT holds 4.6/5 (~800 G2 reviews); Cisco Secure Endpoint holds 4.4/5 (~150 G2 reviews). On our data-weighted score, ESET PROTECT edges ahead (7.9 vs 7.4/10). Pick Cisco Secure Endpoint instead when cisco-centric enterprises wanting integrated edr. See ESET PROTECT alternatives or Cisco Secure Endpoint alternatives.
Frequently asked questions
- Cisco Secure Endpoint vs ESET PROTECT: which is better?
- Cisco Secure Endpoint vs ESET PROTECT: on our data-weighted scoring, ESET PROTECT edges ahead (7.9 vs 7.4/10). Cisco Secure Endpoint starts at Custom quote and is best for cisco-centric enterprises wanting integrated edr; ESET PROTECT starts at Custom quote and is best for teams wanting lightweight, reliable endpoint protection.
- Is Cisco Secure Endpoint cheaper than ESET PROTECT?
- Cisco Secure Endpoint starts at Custom quote and ESET PROTECT starts at Custom quote (see the pricing rows for models and limits).