Cisco Secure Endpoint
- Starting price
- Custom quote
- Reviews
- 4.4/5 (~150 G2 reviews)
- Free trial
- Free trial
- Deployment
- Cloud
- Best for
- Cisco-centric enterprises wanting integrated EDR
Best Endpoint Security & EDR Software · 2026
Cisco Secure Endpoint vs ESET PROTECT: on our data-weighted scoring, ESET PROTECT edges ahead (7.9 vs 7.4/10). Cisco Secure Endpoint starts at Custom quote and is best for cisco-centric enterprises wanting integrated EDR; ESET PROTECT starts at Custom quote and is best for teams wanting lightweight, reliable endpoint protection. Choose ESET PROTECT for the stronger overall track record; consider Cisco Secure Endpoint if its pricing model or fit matches your environment better. Side-by-side table below.
Affiliate disclosure: Some links may be affiliate or partner links. If you sign up through one, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. This never changes our scores or rankings. Learn more.
Six criteria, each scored 0–10 on the same scale from real review data, public pricing and feature coverage. See our methodology →
| Criterion | Cisco Secure Endpoint | ESET PROTECT |
|---|---|---|
| Editorial | 7.4 | 7.9 |
| User reviews | 8.8 | 9.2 |
| Adoption | 5.8 | 7.7 |
| Affordability | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| Feature breadth | 4.0 | 5.0 |
| Ease of trial | 6.0 | 6.0 |
| Cisco Secure Endpoint | ESET PROTECT | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Custom quote | Custom quote |
| Pricing model | quote | per device |
| Free trial / tier | Free trial | 30 days |
| Best for | Cisco-centric enterprises wanting integrated EDR | Teams wanting lightweight, reliable endpoint protection |
| Deployment | Cloud | Cloud + on-prem |
| G2 rating | 4.4/5 (150) | 4.6/5 (800) |
| Capterra rating | — | — |
| Our score | 7.4 | 7.9 |
You need cisco-centric enterprises wanting integrated edr.
You need teams wanting lightweight, reliable endpoint protection.
Both solutions use quote-based pricing with no published per-device rates, making direct cost comparison difficult. ESET PROTECT operates on a per-device model and offers a 30-day free trial, while Cisco Secure Endpoint is cloud-only and provides trial access but requires contacting sales for pricing. Neither offers a free tier.
Key difference: ESET’s lighter agent footprint typically translates to lower TCO for large deployments, whereas Cisco’s pricing often includes broader integration benefits if you’re already invested in their security stack.
| Feature | ESET PROTECT | Cisco Secure Endpoint |
|---|---|---|
| Deployment | Cloud + on-prem | Cloud only |
| Core EDR | Inspect (higher tier) | Built-in with Talos |
| Full-disk encryption | ✓ | — |
| Threat hunting | — | ✓ |
| Sandboxing | — | ✓ |
| XDR/SecureX integration | — | ✓ |
ESET PROTECT excels at lightweight protection with optional EDR add-ons and supports hybrid deployments. Cisco Secure Endpoint is EDR-native, bundled with industry-leading Talos threat intelligence and SecureX platform integration—valuable if you’re standardizing on Cisco.
G2 Community Scores:
Our Score: ESET PROTECT (7.9) edges out Cisco (7.4).
Verdict: Choose ESET PROTECT if you need a lightweight, flexible solution with strong detection and multi-deployment options. Choose Cisco Secure Endpoint if you’re a Cisco-centric enterprise that values integrated EDR, threat hunting, and unified XDR visibility. ESET wins on resource efficiency and deployment flexibility; Cisco wins on integrated intelligence and threat response depth.