Heimdal
7.5/10
MSP Compared score
- Starting price
- Custom quote
- Reviews
- 4.6/5 (~200 G2 reviews)
- Free trial
- Free trial
- Deployment
- Cloud
- Best for
- MSPs wanting patching bundled with a broader security suite
Best Patch Management Software · 2026
Heimdal vs 
Ivanti Neurons Heimdal vs Ivanti Neurons: on our data-weighted scoring, Heimdal edges ahead (7.5 vs 6.6/10). Heimdal starts at Custom quote and is best for MSPs wanting patching bundled with a broader security suite; Ivanti Neurons starts at Custom quote and is best for large enterprises needing risk-based patch prioritization at scale. Choose Heimdal for the stronger overall track record; consider Ivanti Neurons if its pricing model or fit matches your environment better. Side-by-side table below.
Affiliate disclosure: Some links may be affiliate or partner links. If you sign up through one, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. This never changes our scores or rankings. Learn more.
Ivanti Neurons
6.6/10
MSP Compared score
- Starting price
- Custom quote
- Reviews
- 4.0/5 (~50 G2 reviews)
- Free trial
- —
- Deployment
- Cloud + on-prem
- Best for
- Large enterprises needing risk-based patch prioritization at scale
Strengths at a glance
Six criteria, each scored 0–10 on the same scale from real review data, public pricing and feature coverage. See our methodology →
| Criterion | Heimdal | Ivanti Neurons |
|---|---|---|
| Editorial | 7.5 | 6.6 |
| User reviews | 9.2 | 8.0 |
| Adoption | 6.1 | 4.5 |
| Affordability | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| Feature breadth | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| Ease of trial | 6.0 | 3.0 |
Heimdal vs Ivanti Neurons: head-to-head
| Heimdal | Ivanti Neurons | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Custom quote | Custom quote |
| Pricing model | per endpoint | quote |
| Free trial / tier | Free trial | — |
| Best for | MSPs wanting patching bundled with a broader security suite | Large enterprises needing risk-based patch prioritization at scale |
| Deployment | Cloud | Cloud + on-prem |
| G2 rating | 4.6/5 (200) | 4.0/5 (50) |
| Capterra rating | — | — |
| Our score | 7.5 | 6.6 |
Choose Heimdal if…
You need msps wanting patching bundled with a broader security suite.
✓ Pros
- Unified security + patch platform
- Strong MSP program
- Modular
✕ Cons
- Quote-based pricing
- Best value only when bundled
- Newer EDR
Choose Ivanti Neurons if…
You need large enterprises needing risk-based patch prioritization at scale.
✓ Pros
- Strong risk prioritization
- Enterprise scale
- Broad platform
✕ Cons
- Enterprise pricing/complexity
- Vendor had notable CVEs
- Quote-only
In depth
In Depth
Pricing
| Aspect | Heimdal | Ivanti Neurons |
|---|---|---|
| Model | Per-endpoint | Quote-based |
| Free Trial | Yes | No |
| Transparency | Request pricing | Request pricing |
| Best Value For | MSPs, mid-market | Enterprises only |
Both platforms hide pricing behind request forms, but Heimdal’s per-endpoint model offers more predictability for smaller deployments. Heimdal’s free trial lets you test before committing; Ivanti requires enterprise sales discussions upfront. Expect Ivanti’s total cost of ownership to be significantly higher at scale, though volume discounts may apply.
Features & Deployment
Heimdal takes a unified security-first approach:
- Patch + asset management bundled with DNS security, EDR/XDR, and PAM
- Cloud-only deployment keeps infrastructure simple
- Modular design lets you buy only what you need
- Ideal for MSPs seeking an all-in-one stack
Ivanti Neurons emphasizes intelligent patch orchestration:
- Risk-based prioritization with patch intelligence and SLA data
- Covers OS + third-party patching comprehensively
- Hyperautomation reduces manual intervention
- Hybrid deployment (cloud + on-prem) for legacy environments
Heimdal bundles security; Ivanti specializes in patch sophistication. If you need EDR alongside patching, Heimdal wins. If you need surgical, risk-ranked patch campaigns at enterprise scale, Ivanti’s intelligence layer justifies the complexity.
Ratings & Trust
| Platform | G2 Score | Review Count | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Heimdal | 4.6/5 | 200 | High (larger sample) |
| Ivanti Neurons | 4.0/5 | 50 | Moderate (smaller sample) |
Heimdal’s 4.6 score on 200+ reviews suggests consistent satisfaction, especially among MSPs. Ivanti’s 4.0 on just 50 reviews reflects a more niche, enterprise-only customer base—lower volume, less public feedback. Critically, Ivanti has a history of high-severity CVEs in its platform, which should factor into trust assessments for security-conscious teams.
Verdict
Choose Heimdal if you’re an MSP or mid-market buyer wanting a cohesive security + patch suite with transparent per-endpoint pricing and a free trial. The newer EDR isn’t industry-leading, but the bundled value is hard to beat for consolidation.
Choose Ivanti Neurons only if you’re an enterprise that already runs Ivanti’s broader ecosystem and need surgical, risk-ranked patch prioritization at scale. The hyperautomation and intelligence justify the complexity and cost—but only if you have the team to operationalize it. Past security incidents should be carefully reviewed before purchase.
Our Score: Heimdal 7.5 / Ivanti Neurons 6.6
Frequently asked questions
- Heimdal vs Ivanti Neurons: which is better?
- Heimdal vs Ivanti Neurons: on our data-weighted scoring, Heimdal edges ahead (7.5 vs 6.6/10). Heimdal starts at Custom quote and is best for MSPs wanting patching bundled with a broader security suite; Ivanti Neurons starts at Custom quote and is best for large enterprises needing risk-based patch prioritization at scale.
- Is Heimdal cheaper than Ivanti Neurons?
- Heimdal starts at Custom quote and Ivanti Neurons starts at Custom quote (see the pricing rows for models and limits).
Data as of September 17, 2026. Sources: heimdalsecurity.com, ivanti.com. Figures are pulled from public vendor and security data and refreshed automatically.