Ivanti Neurons
6.6/10
MSP Compared score
- Starting price
- Custom quote
- Reviews
- 4.0/5 (~50 G2 reviews)
- Free trial
- —
- Deployment
- Cloud + on-prem
- Best for
- Large enterprises needing risk-based patch prioritization at scale
Best Patch Management Software · 2026
Ivanti Neurons vs 
ManageEngine Endpoint Central Ivanti Neurons vs ManageEngine Endpoint Central: on our data-weighted scoring, ManageEngine Endpoint Central edges ahead (8.0 vs 6.6/10). Ivanti Neurons starts at Custom quote and is best for large enterprises needing risk-based patch prioritization at scale; ManageEngine Endpoint Central starts at Free tier available and is best for teams wanting unified endpoint management + patching in one console. Choose ManageEngine Endpoint Central for the stronger overall track record; consider Ivanti Neurons if its pricing model or fit matches your environment better. Side-by-side table below.
Affiliate disclosure: Some links may be affiliate or partner links. If you sign up through one, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. This never changes our scores or rankings. Learn more.
ManageEngine Endpoint Central
8.0/10
MSP Compared score
- Starting price
- Free tier available
- Reviews
- 4.4/5 (~350 G2 reviews)
- Free trial
- Free tier + 30 days
- Deployment
- Cloud + on-prem
- Best for
- Teams wanting unified endpoint management + patching in one console
Strengths at a glance
Six criteria, each scored 0–10 on the same scale from real review data, public pricing and feature coverage. See our methodology →
| Criterion | Ivanti Neurons | ManageEngine Endpoint Central |
|---|---|---|
| Editorial | 6.6 | 8.0 |
| User reviews | 8.0 | 8.8 |
| Adoption | 4.5 | 6.7 |
| Affordability | 5.0 | 9.5 |
| Feature breadth | 4.0 | 5.0 |
| Ease of trial | 3.0 | 10.0 |
Ivanti Neurons vs ManageEngine Endpoint Central: head-to-head
| Ivanti Neurons | ManageEngine Endpoint Central | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Custom quote | Free tier available |
| Pricing model | quote | per endpoint |
| Free trial / tier | — | Free tier + 30 days |
| Best for | Large enterprises needing risk-based patch prioritization at scale | Teams wanting unified endpoint management + patching in one console |
| Deployment | Cloud + on-prem | Cloud + on-prem |
| G2 rating | 4.0/5 (50) | 4.4/5 (350) |
| Capterra rating | — | — |
| Our score | 6.6 | 8.0 |
Choose Ivanti Neurons if…
You need large enterprises needing risk-based patch prioritization at scale.
✓ Pros
- Strong risk prioritization
- Enterprise scale
- Broad platform
✕ Cons
- Enterprise pricing/complexity
- Vendor had notable CVEs
- Quote-only
Choose ManageEngine Endpoint Central if…
You need teams wanting unified endpoint management + patching in one console.
✓ Pros
- Free up to 25 endpoints
- One console for UEM + patch
- Broad OS + mobile coverage
✕ Cons
- Editions/add-ons get complex
- Quote-based pricing
- Heavier than patch-only tools
In depth
In Depth
Pricing
| Aspect | ManageEngine Endpoint Central | Ivanti Neurons |
|---|---|---|
| Model | Per-endpoint | Quote-based |
| Free Tier | Yes (up to 25 endpoints) | No |
| Entry Point | ~$795/yr (50 endpoints) | Custom quote |
| Best For | Growing teams, cost-conscious orgs | Enterprise-only deals |
ManageEngine wins on accessibility with its free tier and transparent per-endpoint pricing ladder. Ivanti requires direct vendor contact—typical for enterprise-grade patch orchestration, but a friction point for mid-market evaluation.
Features & Deployment
ManageEngine bundles patch management with full UEM (mobile + desktop), OS imaging, and remote control in a single console. It’s positioned as an all-in-one endpoint platform. Cloud and on-prem deployments are available.
Ivanti Neurons is laser-focused on patch intelligence, emphasizing risk-based prioritization, third-party OS patching, SLA-driven automation, and hyperautomation primitives. Also supports cloud and on-prem.
The trade-off: ManageEngine offers breadth (good for small-to-mid teams wanting one tool); Ivanti offers depth in patch risk assessment (critical for large, compliance-heavy environments).
Ratings & Verdict
| Metric | ManageEngine | Ivanti |
|---|---|---|
| G2 Score | 4.4 / 5 | 4.0 / 5 |
| Review Count | 350 | 50 |
| Our Score | 8.0 | 6.6 |
ManageEngine’s higher G2 score and review volume suggest broader buyer satisfaction and market adoption. Ivanti’s lower count reflects its enterprise-only positioning and smaller reviewer base.
Verdict:
Choose ManageEngine Endpoint Central if you need unified endpoint + patch management at reasonable cost and want a free tier to pilot. Ideal for mid-market and teams new to endpoint management.
Choose Ivanti Neurons if you’re a large enterprise with complex compliance requirements and need sophisticated, risk-ranked patch intelligence to justify custom negotiations. The trade-off is complexity and vendor lock-in risk—weigh this against patch prioritization gains.
Frequently asked questions
- Ivanti Neurons vs ManageEngine Endpoint Central: which is better?
- Ivanti Neurons vs ManageEngine Endpoint Central: on our data-weighted scoring, ManageEngine Endpoint Central edges ahead (8.0 vs 6.6/10). Ivanti Neurons starts at Custom quote and is best for large enterprises needing risk-based patch prioritization at scale; ManageEngine Endpoint Central starts at Free tier available and is best for teams wanting unified endpoint management + patching in one console.
- Is Ivanti Neurons cheaper than ManageEngine Endpoint Central?
- Ivanti Neurons starts at Custom quote and ManageEngine Endpoint Central starts at Free tier available (see the pricing rows for models and limits).
Data as of September 17, 2026. Sources: ivanti.com, manageengine.com. Figures are pulled from public vendor and security data and refreshed automatically.