Ivanti Neurons
6.6/10
MSP Compared score
- Starting price
- Custom quote
- Reviews
- 4.0/5 (~50 G2 reviews)
- Free trial
- —
- Deployment
- Cloud + on-prem
- Best for
- Large enterprises needing risk-based patch prioritization at scale
Best Patch Management Software · 2026
Ivanti Neurons vs 
PDQ Connect Ivanti Neurons vs PDQ Connect: on our data-weighted scoring, PDQ Connect edges ahead (7.5 vs 6.6/10). Ivanti Neurons starts at Custom quote and is best for large enterprises needing risk-based patch prioritization at scale; PDQ Connect starts at Custom quote and is best for teams that want PDQ's deployment power for remote/cloud-managed devices. Choose PDQ Connect for the stronger overall track record; consider Ivanti Neurons if its pricing model or fit matches your environment better. Side-by-side table below.
Affiliate disclosure: Some links may be affiliate or partner links. If you sign up through one, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. This never changes our scores or rankings. Learn more.
PDQ Connect
7.5/10
MSP Compared score
- Starting price
- Custom quote
- Reviews
- 4.6/5 (~40 G2 reviews)
- Free trial
- 14 days
- Deployment
- Cloud
- Best for
- Teams that want PDQ's deployment power for remote/cloud-managed devices
Strengths at a glance
Six criteria, each scored 0–10 on the same scale from real review data, public pricing and feature coverage. See our methodology →
| Criterion | Ivanti Neurons | PDQ Connect |
|---|---|---|
| Editorial | 6.6 | 7.5 |
| User reviews | 8.0 | 9.2 |
| Adoption | 4.5 | 4.3 |
| Affordability | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| Feature breadth | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| Ease of trial | 3.0 | 6.0 |
Ivanti Neurons vs PDQ Connect: head-to-head
| Ivanti Neurons | PDQ Connect | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Custom quote | Custom quote |
| Pricing model | quote | per device |
| Free trial / tier | — | 14 days |
| Best for | Large enterprises needing risk-based patch prioritization at scale | Teams that want PDQ's deployment power for remote/cloud-managed devices |
| Deployment | Cloud + on-prem | Cloud |
| G2 rating | 4.0/5 (50) | 4.6/5 (40) |
| Capterra rating | — | — |
| Our score | 6.6 | 7.5 |
Choose Ivanti Neurons if…
You need large enterprises needing risk-based patch prioritization at scale.
✓ Pros
- Strong risk prioritization
- Enterprise scale
- Broad platform
✕ Cons
- Enterprise pricing/complexity
- Vendor had notable CVEs
- Quote-only
Choose PDQ Connect if…
You need teams that want pdq's deployment power for remote/cloud-managed devices.
✓ Pros
- Cloud version of PDQ's strong deployment engine
- Manages remote devices
- Simple agent
✕ Cons
- Newer than Deploy
- Windows-focused
- Per-device pricing
In depth
Pricing
| Feature | PDQ Connect | Ivanti Neurons |
|---|---|---|
| Model | Per-device/month (annual billing) | Custom quote |
| Free Tier | No | No |
| Free Trial | 14 days | Not specified |
| Transparency | Minimal (quote required) | None (enterprise-only) |
PDQ Connect uses straightforward per-device pricing but requires a quote, making cost comparison difficult. Ivanti Neurons is fully custom-priced for enterprise deals, which means no public pricing and likely higher minimum commitments. For budget-conscious teams, PDQ’s device-based model is more predictable than Ivanti’s black-box enterprise pricing.
Features & Deployment
PDQ Connect is cloud-native and agent-based, purpose-built for remote/off-network Windows devices. It pairs patching with software deployment—a real differentiator if you need both. The agent is lightweight and doesn’t require VPN access. However, it’s Windows-only and relatively new compared to PDQ’s on-premises Deploy product.
Ivanti Neurons operates cloud or on-premises and focuses on risk-based patch prioritization with SLA intelligence. It handles OS and third-party patching across broader platforms. Hyperautomation capabilities suggest workflow integration, but the complexity is higher and suited for large organizations with dedicated patch teams.
Verdict: Choose PDQ Connect for remote Windows shops that value simplicity and deployment flexibility. Choose Ivanti Neurons if your enterprise demands risk-scoring, multi-platform support, and you have the budget and staff to manage it.
Ratings & Verdict
| Source | PDQ Connect | Ivanti Neurons |
|---|---|---|
| G2 Score | 4.6/5 (40 reviews) | 4.0/5 (50 reviews) |
| Our Score | 7.5 | 6.6 |
PDQ Connect edges ahead with higher user satisfaction—reviewers praise its simplicity and deployment power. Ivanti Neurons scores lower, likely due to enterprise complexity and implementation overhead. Notably, Ivanti has faced significant security vulnerabilities as a vendor, which may concern risk-averse teams.
Final Verdict: PDQ Connect wins for mid-market agility. It’s simpler, cheaper to forecast, and rated higher. Ivanti Neurons wins for risk-obsessed enterprises that can justify complexity and custom pricing for advanced prioritization. For most teams, PDQ Connect offers better value.
Frequently asked questions
- Ivanti Neurons vs PDQ Connect: which is better?
- Ivanti Neurons vs PDQ Connect: on our data-weighted scoring, PDQ Connect edges ahead (7.5 vs 6.6/10). Ivanti Neurons starts at Custom quote and is best for large enterprises needing risk-based patch prioritization at scale; PDQ Connect starts at Custom quote and is best for teams that want PDQ's deployment power for remote/cloud-managed devices.
- Is Ivanti Neurons cheaper than PDQ Connect?
- Ivanti Neurons starts at Custom quote and PDQ Connect starts at Custom quote (see the pricing rows for models and limits).
Data as of October 12, 2026. Sources: ivanti.com, pdq.com. Figures are pulled from public vendor and security data and refreshed automatically.