Ivanti Neurons
6.6/10
MSP Compared score
- Starting price
- Custom quote
- Reviews
- 4.0/5 (~50 G2 reviews)
- Free trial
- —
- Deployment
- Cloud + on-prem
- Best for
- Large enterprises needing risk-based patch prioritization at scale
Best Patch Management Software · 2026
Ivanti Neurons vs 
PDQ Deploy & Inventory Ivanti Neurons vs PDQ Deploy & Inventory: on our data-weighted scoring, PDQ Deploy & Inventory edges ahead (7.9 vs 6.6/10). Ivanti Neurons starts at Custom quote and is best for large enterprises needing risk-based patch prioritization at scale; PDQ Deploy & Inventory starts at Custom quote and is best for windows-only shops that want fast, scriptable on-prem deployment. Choose PDQ Deploy & Inventory for the stronger overall track record; consider Ivanti Neurons if its pricing model or fit matches your environment better. Side-by-side table below.
Affiliate disclosure: Some links may be affiliate or partner links. If you sign up through one, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. This never changes our scores or rankings. Learn more.
PDQ Deploy & Inventory
7.9/10
MSP Compared score
- Starting price
- Custom quote
- Reviews
- 4.7/5 (~60 G2 reviews)
- Free trial
- 14 days
- Deployment
- On-prem
- Best for
- Windows-only shops that want fast, scriptable on-prem deployment
Strengths at a glance
Six criteria, each scored 0–10 on the same scale from real review data, public pricing and feature coverage. See our methodology →
| Criterion | Ivanti Neurons | PDQ Deploy & Inventory |
|---|---|---|
| Editorial | 6.6 | 7.9 |
| User reviews | 8.0 | 9.4 |
| Adoption | 4.5 | 4.7 |
| Affordability | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| Feature breadth | 4.0 | 5.0 |
| Ease of trial | 3.0 | 6.0 |
Ivanti Neurons vs PDQ Deploy & Inventory: head-to-head
| Ivanti Neurons | PDQ Deploy & Inventory | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Custom quote | Custom quote |
| Pricing model | quote | per machine |
| Free trial / tier | — | 14 days |
| Best for | Large enterprises needing risk-based patch prioritization at scale | Windows-only shops that want fast, scriptable on-prem deployment |
| Deployment | Cloud + on-prem | On-prem |
| G2 rating | 4.0/5 (50) | 4.7/5 (60) |
| Capterra rating | — | — |
| Our score | 6.6 | 7.9 |
Choose Ivanti Neurons if…
You need large enterprises needing risk-based patch prioritization at scale.
✓ Pros
- Strong risk prioritization
- Enterprise scale
- Broad platform
✕ Cons
- Enterprise pricing/complexity
- Vendor had notable CVEs
- Quote-only
Choose PDQ Deploy & Inventory if…
You need windows-only shops that want fast, scriptable on-prem deployment.
✓ Pros
- Fast and reliable on Windows
- Huge ready-made package library
- Loved by sysadmins
✕ Cons
- Windows-only
- On-prem (agentless on LAN)
- Pricing not fully public
In depth
In Depth
Pricing
| Aspect | PDQ Deploy & Inventory | Ivanti Neurons |
|---|---|---|
| Model | Per-machine annual license | Quote-based |
| Transparency | Limited (contact sales) | Opaque (enterprise only) |
| Free Trial | 14 days | None listed |
| Best For | Mid-market Windows shops | Fortune 500 enterprises |
PDQ keeps pricing behind a quote wall, but the per-machine model is predictable for smaller deployments. Ivanti’s enterprise-only approach means you’ll need a sales conversation just to ballpark costs—typical for organizations managing thousands of endpoints.
Features & Deployment
PDQ Deploy & Inventory is laser-focused: Windows machines, on-premises agentless deployment over the LAN, and a legendary library of 2,000+ pre-built application packages. You can schedule deployments, target groups with precision, and pull rich inventory data—all without leaving your network. It’s purposefully narrow.
Ivanti Neurons swings for the fences: risk-based patch prioritization (the real differentiator), OS + third-party patching in one pane, patch intelligence feeds, and hyperautomation hooks. Cloud + on-prem flexibility. But it’s overkill for a 50-machine Windows lab and more suited to sprawling, heterogeneous infrastructure.
Deployment winner: PDQ for simplicity; Ivanti for sprawl.
Ratings & Trust
| Source | PDQ | Ivanti |
|---|---|---|
| G2 Score | 4.7/5 (60 reviews) | 4.0/5 (50 reviews) |
| Sentiment | ”Loved by sysadmins” | Enterprise-grade but complex |
PDQ’s higher G2 score reflects passionate mid-market adoption and low friction. Ivanti’s lower score hints at enterprise complexity and, notably, the vendor has had high-profile security vulnerabilities that eroded confidence in recent years. That matters when you’re trusting patch management to a platform.
Verdict
Pick PDQ if: You run Windows, want to deploy fast, and prefer simplicity over enterprise sprawl. The 14-day trial is free; the learning curve is gentle.
Pick Ivanti if: You’re managing 10,000+ endpoints across Windows/Linux/macOS, need AI-driven risk prioritization, and have a budget and procurement team. Accept the complexity tax.
Our take: PDQ wins on value and joy-of-use for typical IT teams. Ivanti wins on scale and risk intelligence—but only if you have the headcount and budget to operate it. For most organizations, PDQ’s ruthless focus on Windows speed beats Ivanti’s ambitious breadth.
Frequently asked questions
- Ivanti Neurons vs PDQ Deploy & Inventory: which is better?
- Ivanti Neurons vs PDQ Deploy & Inventory: on our data-weighted scoring, PDQ Deploy & Inventory edges ahead (7.9 vs 6.6/10). Ivanti Neurons starts at Custom quote and is best for large enterprises needing risk-based patch prioritization at scale; PDQ Deploy & Inventory starts at Custom quote and is best for windows-only shops that want fast, scriptable on-prem deployment.
- Is Ivanti Neurons cheaper than PDQ Deploy & Inventory?
- Ivanti Neurons starts at Custom quote and PDQ Deploy & Inventory starts at Custom quote (see the pricing rows for models and limits).
Data as of September 17, 2026. Sources: ivanti.com, pdq.com. Figures are pulled from public vendor and security data and refreshed automatically.