Keeper
8.1/10
MSP Compared score
- Starting price
- $2/user/mo
- Reviews
- 4.6/5 (~900 G2 reviews)
- Free trial
- 14 days
- Deployment
- Cloud
- Best for
- Teams wanting low entry pricing plus a path to privileged access management
Best Password Manager (Business) · 2026
Keeper vs 
N-able Passportal Keeper vs N-able Passportal: on our data-weighted scoring, Keeper edges ahead (8.1 vs 7.6/10). Keeper starts at $2/user/mo and is best for teams wanting low entry pricing plus a path to privileged access management; N-able Passportal starts at Custom quote and is best for MSPs needing client password + documentation management with PSA/RMM integration. Choose Keeper for the stronger overall track record; consider N-able Passportal if its pricing model or fit matches your environment better. Side-by-side table below.
Affiliate disclosure: Some links may be affiliate or partner links. If you sign up through one, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. This never changes our scores or rankings. Learn more.
N-able Passportal
7.6/10
MSP Compared score
- Starting price
- Custom quote
- Reviews
- 4.3/5 (~80 G2 reviews)
- Free trial
- Free trial
- Deployment
- Cloud
- Best for
- MSPs needing client password + documentation management with PSA/RMM integration
Strengths at a glance
Six criteria, each scored 0–10 on the same scale from real review data, public pricing and feature coverage. See our methodology →
| Criterion | Keeper | N-able Passportal |
|---|---|---|
| Editorial | 8.1 | 7.6 |
| User reviews | 9.2 | 8.6 |
| Adoption | 7.8 | 5.1 |
| Affordability | 8.5 | 5.0 |
| Feature breadth | 6.0 | 6.0 |
| Ease of trial | 6.0 | 6.0 |
Keeper vs N-able Passportal: head-to-head
| Keeper | N-able Passportal | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $2/user/mo | Custom quote |
| Pricing model | per user | quote |
| Free trial / tier | 14 days | Free trial |
| Best for | Teams wanting low entry pricing plus a path to privileged access management | MSPs needing client password + documentation management with PSA/RMM integration |
| Deployment | Cloud | Cloud |
| G2 rating | 4.6/5 (900) | 4.3/5 (80) |
| Capterra rating | — | — |
| Our score | 8.1 | 7.6 |
Choose Keeper if…
You need teams wanting low entry pricing plus a path to privileged access management.
✓ Pros
- Very low entry price
- FedRAMP/SOC 2 compliance depth
- Clear path to PAM
✕ Cons
- Add-on modules raise real cost
- UI feels utilitarian
- SSO gated to higher tiers
Choose N-able Passportal if…
You need msps needing client password + documentation management with psa/rmm integration.
✓ Pros
- Purpose-built for MSP multi-client use
- Password + documentation in one
- Deep PSA/RMM integration
✕ Cons
- Quote-only pricing
- Geared to MSPs (not internal IT)
- Setup investment
In depth
Pricing
Keeper
Keeper uses a transparent per-user, annual billing model starting at just $2/user/month for Business Starter (capped at 10 users). This is genuinely aggressive entry pricing. Scaling to Business ($3.75/user/mo) adds role policies and audit trails; Enterprise ($5/user/mo) unlocks SSO and SCIM. A 14-day free trial lets you test before committing. The catch: privileged access management (KeeperPAM) requires a custom quote, and audit/compliance modules can inflate your total cost significantly.
N-able Passportal
Passportal abandons published pricing entirely—it’s quote-only. This is typical for MSP-focused tools where per-client seat counts and integration depth vary wildly. A free trial exists, but you’ll need to contact sales to understand real costs. For MSPs already paying N-able for RMM/PSA, the bundling economics may justify the opacity; for standalone evaluation, this is opaque.
Verdict: Keeper wins on transparency and entry cost for internal teams. Passportal’s hidden pricing signals it’s designed for deal-based MSP sales.
Features & Deployment
Keeper
Both solutions are cloud-native. Keeper’s feature set is password-vault-first: zero-knowledge encryption, vault sharing, role-based policies, and BreachWatch breach notifications. SSO (SAML) and SCIM provisioning are locked behind the Enterprise tier, which grates for IT teams already standardized on directory sync. The standout differentiator is a documented upgrade path to KeeperPAM for privileged access—useful for teams wanting to grow into credential management without rip-and-replace.
N-able Passportal
Passportal is MSP-native: it couples encrypted credential vaulting with built-in IT documentation linking (articles, runbooks) so technicians stay in one tool. Automated password rotation, technician access controls (with instant lockout), and tight ConnectWise/PSA integrations are table stakes. It’s purpose-built for multi-client environments where credentials and how-to docs live together.
Verdict: Keeper is the generalist vault; Passportal is a specialist MSP credential + documentation hub. Pick based on your role (internal IT vs. managed services).
Ratings & Community
| Platform | G2 Score | Reviews | Audience |
|---|---|---|---|
| Keeper | 4.6/5 | 900 | Enterprise & SMB |
| Passportal | 4.3/5 | 80 | MSPs only |
Keeper’s larger review base (900 vs. 80) reflects broader market appeal. Both score solidly; the 0.3-point gap is noise. Passportal’s smaller pool suggests less public visibility—typical for MSP-only tools where decision-makers aren’t vocal on review sites.
Verdict
Choose Keeper if:
- You’re an internal IT team or mid-market company needing transparent, affordable password management.
- You want a future upgrade path to PAM without vendor switching.
- SSO/SCIM are non-negotiable (but budget for Enterprise tier).
Choose Passportal if:
- You’re an MSP managing client passwords and technical documentation across multiple tenants.
- ConnectWise/PSA integration is essential to your workflow.
- You accept opaque pricing in exchange for MSP-specific features and one pane of glass.
Keeper edges ahead on value and flexibility for most buyers; Passportal is the right choice only if you live in the MSP world.
Frequently asked questions
- Keeper vs N-able Passportal: which is better?
- Keeper vs N-able Passportal: on our data-weighted scoring, Keeper edges ahead (8.1 vs 7.6/10). Keeper starts at $2/user/mo and is best for teams wanting low entry pricing plus a path to privileged access management; N-able Passportal starts at Custom quote and is best for MSPs needing client password + documentation management with PSA/RMM integration.
- Is Keeper cheaper than N-able Passportal?
- Keeper starts at $2/user/mo and N-able Passportal starts at Custom quote (see the pricing rows for models and limits).
Data as of September 17, 2026. Sources: keepersecurity.com, n-able.com. Figures are pulled from public vendor and security data and refreshed automatically.