Atera
8.6/10
MSP Compared score
- Starting price
- $129/tech/mo
- Reviews
- 4.6/5 (~800 G2 reviews)
- Free trial
- 30 days
- Deployment
- Cloud
- Best for
- Lean MSPs and IT teams wanting all-in-one RMM+PSA at a flat per-tech price
Best RMM Software · 2026
Atera vs 
HaloPSA Atera vs HaloPSA: on our data-weighted scoring, Atera edges ahead (8.2 vs 7.9/10). Atera starts at $129/tech/mo and is best for lean msps and it teams wanting all-in-one rmm+psa at a flat per-tech price; HaloPSA starts at $59/agent/mo and is best for msps wanting a modern, highly configurable psa with transparent pricing. Choose Atera for the stronger overall track record; consider HaloPSA if its pricing model or fit matches your environment better. Side-by-side table below.
HaloPSA
8.5/10
MSP Compared score
- Starting price
- $59/agent/mo
- Reviews
- 4.6/5 (~80 G2 reviews)
- Free trial
- 30 days
- Deployment
- Cloud + on-prem
- Best for
- MSPs wanting a modern, highly configurable PSA with transparent pricing
Affiliate links — vendors may pay us a commission. It never affects our data-driven ranking.
Strengths at a glance
Six criteria, each scored 0–10 on the same scale from real review data, public pricing and feature coverage. See our methodology →
| Criterion | Atera | HaloPSA |
|---|---|---|
| Editorial | 8.2 | 7.9 |
| User reviews | 9.2 | 9.2 |
| Adoption | 7.7 | 5.1 |
| Affordability | 1.0 | 2.2 |
| Feature breadth | 6.0 | 5.0 |
| Ease of trial | 6.0 | 6.0 |
Atera vs HaloPSA: head-to-head
| Atera | HaloPSA | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $129/tech/mo | $59/agent/mo |
| Pricing model | per technician | per agent |
| Free trial / tier | 30 days | 30 days |
| Best for | Lean MSPs and IT teams wanting all-in-one RMM+PSA at a flat per-tech price | MSPs wanting a modern, highly configurable PSA with transparent pricing |
| Deployment | Cloud | Cloud + on-prem |
| G2 rating | 4.6/5 (800) | 4.6/5 (80) |
| Capterra rating | 4.6/5 (400) | — |
| Our score | 8.2 | 7.9 |
Choose Atera if…
You need lean msps and it teams wanting all-in-one rmm+psa at a flat per-tech price.
Pros
- Per-technician pricing = predictable cost
- Unlimited endpoints
- All-in-one for small MSPs
Cons
- Per-tech model pricey for few-tech/many-device shops
- Add-ons (Copilot
- network discovery) cost extra
- Less depth than enterprise RMM
Choose HaloPSA if…
You need msps wanting a modern, highly configurable psa with transparent pricing.
Pros
- Modern UI
- Transparent per-agent pricing
- Very configurable
Cons
- Configurability = setup time
- Smaller ecosystem than ConnectWise
- Per-agent cost
In depth
Pricing: Atera vs HaloPSA
Atera bills on a per technician model from $129/tech/mo (30 days trial), while HaloPSA uses a per agent model from $59/agent/mo (30 days trial). Because the models differ, the cheaper option flips depending on your fleet size — model both at your seat/endpoint count.
Features & deployment
Atera ships 6 headline capabilities (RMM + PSA + helpdesk, Unlimited devices per technician, Patch management, Remote access (Splashtop)) and deploys Cloud. HaloPSA ships 5 (Ticketing + billing, Contracts + SLAs, Project management, Automation), deploying Cloud + on-prem.
Ratings & verdict
Atera holds 4.6/5 (~800 G2 reviews); HaloPSA holds 4.6/5 (~80 G2 reviews). On our data-weighted score, Atera edges ahead (8.2 vs 7.9/10). Pick HaloPSA instead when msps wanting a modern, highly configurable psa with transparent pricing. See Atera alternatives or HaloPSA alternatives.
Frequently asked questions
- Atera vs HaloPSA: which is better?
- Atera vs HaloPSA: on our data-weighted scoring, Atera edges ahead (8.2 vs 7.9/10). Atera starts at $129/tech/mo and is best for lean msps and it teams wanting all-in-one rmm+psa at a flat per-tech price; HaloPSA starts at $59/agent/mo and is best for msps wanting a modern, highly configurable psa with transparent pricing.
- Is Atera cheaper than HaloPSA?
- Atera starts at $129/tech/mo and HaloPSA starts at $59/agent/mo (see the pricing rows for models and limits).
Data as of June 16, 2026. Sources: atera.com, halopsa.com. Figures are pulled from public vendor and security data and refreshed automatically.