Automox
7.7/10
MSP Compared score
- Starting price
- $3/endpoint/mo
- Reviews
- 4.5/5 (~90 G2 reviews)
- Free trial
- 14 days
- Deployment
- Cloud
- Best for
- Cloud-native cross-OS patch + config automation for lean IT teams
Best Patch Management Software · 2026
Automox vs 
Ivanti Neurons Automox vs Ivanti Neurons: on our data-weighted scoring, Automox edges ahead (7.7 vs 6.6/10). Automox starts at $3/endpoint/mo and is best for cloud-native cross-OS patch + config automation for lean IT teams; Ivanti Neurons starts at Custom quote and is best for large enterprises needing risk-based patch prioritization at scale. Choose Automox for the stronger overall track record; consider Ivanti Neurons if its pricing model or fit matches your environment better. Side-by-side table below.
Affiliate disclosure: Some links may be affiliate or partner links. If you sign up through one, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. This never changes our scores or rankings. Learn more.
Ivanti Neurons
6.6/10
MSP Compared score
- Starting price
- Custom quote
- Reviews
- 4.0/5 (~50 G2 reviews)
- Free trial
- —
- Deployment
- Cloud + on-prem
- Best for
- Large enterprises needing risk-based patch prioritization at scale
Strengths at a glance
Six criteria, each scored 0–10 on the same scale from real review data, public pricing and feature coverage. See our methodology →
| Criterion | Automox | Ivanti Neurons |
|---|---|---|
| Editorial | 7.7 | 6.6 |
| User reviews | 9.0 | 8.0 |
| Adoption | 5.2 | 4.5 |
| Affordability | 7.6 | 5.0 |
| Feature breadth | 5.0 | 4.0 |
| Ease of trial | 6.0 | 3.0 |
Automox vs Ivanti Neurons: head-to-head
| Automox | Ivanti Neurons | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $3/endpoint/mo | Custom quote |
| Pricing model | per endpoint | quote |
| Free trial / tier | 14 days | — |
| Best for | Cloud-native cross-OS patch + config automation for lean IT teams | Large enterprises needing risk-based patch prioritization at scale |
| Deployment | Cloud | Cloud + on-prem |
| G2 rating | 4.5/5 (90) | 4.0/5 (50) |
| Capterra rating | — | — |
| Our score | 7.7 | 6.6 |
Choose Automox if…
You need cloud-native cross-os patch + config automation for lean it teams.
✓ Pros
- True cross-OS parity
- No on-prem infrastructure
- Flexible automation via Worklets
✕ Cons
- No free tier
- Per-endpoint cost adds up
- Reporting depth trails enterprise suites
Choose Ivanti Neurons if…
You need large enterprises needing risk-based patch prioritization at scale.
✓ Pros
- Strong risk prioritization
- Enterprise scale
- Broad platform
✕ Cons
- Enterprise pricing/complexity
- Vendor had notable CVEs
- Quote-only
In depth
In Depth
Pricing
| Aspect | Automox | Ivanti Neurons |
|---|---|---|
| Model | Per-endpoint/month | Custom quote |
| Entry Cost | $3/endpoint/mo (Manage tier) | Contact vendor |
| Free Trial | 14 days | Not specified |
| Billing | Annual commitment | Enterprise licensing |
| Transparency | Published pricing | Opaque |
Automox wins on predictability—you know upfront what each machine costs. Ivanti Neurons requires sales engagement, making budget forecasting harder for mid-market buyers. For 500 endpoints, Automox runs roughly $1,500–2,500/year; Ivanti’s cost depends entirely on negotiation leverage.
Features & Deployment
Automox is cloud-only, reducing operational overhead. It excels at:
- True cross-OS parity (Windows, macOS, Linux equally mature)
- Third-party app patching (browsers, Java, Adobe, etc.)
- Worklets for custom automation without custom coding
- No on-premises footprint—ideal for remote-first and hybrid teams
Ivanti Neurons offers cloud and on-prem, targeting large enterprises:
- Risk-based prioritization (real-time threat intelligence)
- Patch intelligence/SLA data for compliance auditing
- Hyperautomation for complex deployment orchestration
- Broader integration ecosystem
Verdict: Automox for lean DevOps teams; Ivanti for risk-conscious enterprises managing sprawling infrastructure.
Ratings & Trust
| Source | Automox | Ivanti Neurons |
|---|---|---|
| G2 Score | 4.5/5 (90 reviews) | 4.0/5 (50 reviews) |
| Our Score | 7.7/10 | 6.6/10 |
Automox edges ahead in user satisfaction, likely due to simpler deployment and faster time-to-value. Ivanti’s lower score reflects longer sales cycles and integration complexity. Note: Ivanti faced notable security incidents in its vendor history, which may weigh on enterprise risk assessments.
Verdict
- Pick Automox if you want simplicity, transparent pricing, and cross-OS consistency without on-prem baggage.
- Pick Ivanti Neurons if you operate at enterprise scale, need risk-scoring triage, and have dedicated patch management staff to absorb complexity.
Frequently asked questions
- Automox vs Ivanti Neurons: which is better?
- Automox vs Ivanti Neurons: on our data-weighted scoring, Automox edges ahead (7.7 vs 6.6/10). Automox starts at $3/endpoint/mo and is best for cloud-native cross-OS patch + config automation for lean IT teams; Ivanti Neurons starts at Custom quote and is best for large enterprises needing risk-based patch prioritization at scale.
- Is Automox cheaper than Ivanti Neurons?
- Automox starts at $3/endpoint/mo and Ivanti Neurons starts at Custom quote (see the pricing rows for models and limits).
Data as of September 17, 2026. Sources: automox.com, ivanti.com. Figures are pulled from public vendor and security data and refreshed automatically.