Bitdefender GravityZone
8.1/10
MSP Compared score
- Starting price
- Custom quote
- Reviews
- 4.6/5 (~400 G2 reviews)
- Free trial
- 30 days
- Deployment
- Cloud + on-prem
- Best for
- SMBs and MSPs wanting strong protection at a fair price
Best Endpoint Security & EDR Software · 2026
Bitdefender GravityZone vs 
Cisco Secure Endpoint Bitdefender GravityZone vs Cisco Secure Endpoint: on our data-weighted scoring, Bitdefender GravityZone edges ahead (8.1 vs 7.4/10). Bitdefender GravityZone starts at Custom quote and is best for SMBs and MSPs wanting strong protection at a fair price; Cisco Secure Endpoint starts at Custom quote and is best for cisco-centric enterprises wanting integrated EDR. Choose Bitdefender GravityZone for the stronger overall track record; consider Cisco Secure Endpoint if its pricing model or fit matches your environment better. Side-by-side table below.
Affiliate disclosure: Some links may be affiliate or partner links. If you sign up through one, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. This never changes our scores or rankings. Learn more.
Cisco Secure Endpoint
7.4/10
MSP Compared score
- Starting price
- Custom quote
- Reviews
- 4.4/5 (~150 G2 reviews)
- Free trial
- Free trial
- Deployment
- Cloud
- Best for
- Cisco-centric enterprises wanting integrated EDR
Strengths at a glance
Six criteria, each scored 0–10 on the same scale from real review data, public pricing and feature coverage. See our methodology →
| Criterion | Bitdefender GravityZone | Cisco Secure Endpoint |
|---|---|---|
| Editorial | 8.1 | 7.4 |
| User reviews | 9.2 | 8.8 |
| Adoption | 6.9 | 5.8 |
| Affordability | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| Feature breadth | 5.0 | 4.0 |
| Ease of trial | 6.0 | 6.0 |
Bitdefender GravityZone vs Cisco Secure Endpoint: head-to-head
| Bitdefender GravityZone | Cisco Secure Endpoint | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Custom quote | Custom quote |
| Pricing model | per device | quote |
| Free trial / tier | 30 days | Free trial |
| Best for | SMBs and MSPs wanting strong protection at a fair price | Cisco-centric enterprises wanting integrated EDR |
| Deployment | Cloud + on-prem | Cloud |
| G2 rating | 4.6/5 (400) | 4.4/5 (150) |
| Capterra rating | — | — |
| Our score | 8.1 | 7.4 |
Choose Bitdefender GravityZone if…
You need smbs and msps wanting strong protection at a fair price.
✓ Pros
- Excellent independent AV test scores
- Affordable
- Good MSP program
✕ Cons
- EDR is a higher tier
- Console can feel dense
- Per-device tiers
Choose Cisco Secure Endpoint if…
You need cisco-centric enterprises wanting integrated edr.
✓ Pros
- Talos threat intelligence
- Integrates with Cisco stack
- Solid detection
✕ Cons
- Best within Cisco ecosystem
- Quote pricing
- Heavier admin
In depth
In Depth
Pricing
| Aspect | Bitdefender GravityZone | Cisco Secure Endpoint |
|---|---|---|
| Model | Per-device annual | Custom quote |
| Starting Point | ~$77/yr per device (3-device minimum) | Contact sales |
| Free Trial | 30 days | Yes |
| Best For | Budget-conscious SMBs & MSPs | Enterprise negotiations |
Bitdefender wins on transparency and accessibility. Its per-device model starts affordably and scales predictably, with monthly billing available for MSPs. Cisco requires enterprise sales cycles—no public pricing, making budget planning difficult for smaller teams.
Features & Deployment
Bitdefender GravityZone combines cloud + on-prem flexibility. Core strength is its AV engine (consistently top-rated independently), with EDR/XDR available as premium add-ons. Risk analytics, patch management, and full-disk encryption round out the suite. This tiered approach means you pay for what you need, though EDR requires stepping up to a higher tier.
Cisco Secure Endpoint is cloud-only and EDR-first. It bundles threat hunting, sandboxing, and Talos threat intelligence by default. Integration with Cisco’s SecureX platform and broader security stack is seamless—a major advantage if you’re already Cisco-heavy. However, it’s engineered more for enterprises than SMBs.
Deployment Winner: Bitdefender for flexibility; Cisco for integrated enterprises.
Ratings & Verdict
| Rating | Bitdefender | Cisco |
|---|---|---|
| G2 Score | 4.6/5 (400 reviews) | 4.4/5 (150 reviews) |
| Our Score | 8.1/10 | 7.4/10 |
Bitdefender edges ahead on both community and our assessment. It delivers solid independent AV performance, affordable entry pricing, and a genuine MSP program—ideal for resellers and cost-sensitive buyers.
Cisco Secure Endpoint shines in environments already invested in Cisco infrastructure. Its EDR capabilities and Talos intelligence are strong, but quote pricing and enterprise focus make it less accessible to SMBs.
Verdict: Choose Bitdefender GravityZone for transparent pricing, proven AV scores, and MSP-friendly flexibility. Choose Cisco Secure Endpoint only if you’re entrenched in Cisco’s ecosystem and need integrated threat hunting at any cost.
Frequently asked questions
- Bitdefender GravityZone vs Cisco Secure Endpoint: which is better?
- Bitdefender GravityZone vs Cisco Secure Endpoint: on our data-weighted scoring, Bitdefender GravityZone edges ahead (8.1 vs 7.4/10). Bitdefender GravityZone starts at Custom quote and is best for SMBs and MSPs wanting strong protection at a fair price; Cisco Secure Endpoint starts at Custom quote and is best for cisco-centric enterprises wanting integrated EDR.
- Is Bitdefender GravityZone cheaper than Cisco Secure Endpoint?
- Bitdefender GravityZone starts at Custom quote and Cisco Secure Endpoint starts at Custom quote (see the pricing rows for models and limits).
Data as of September 17, 2026. Sources: bitdefender.com, cisco.com. Figures are pulled from public vendor and security data and refreshed automatically.