Datto RMM
7.7/10
MSP Compared score
- Starting price
- Custom quote
- Reviews
- 4.5/5 (~700 G2 reviews)
- Free trial
- Free trial
- Deployment
- Cloud
- Best for
- Established MSPs in the Kaseya/Datto ecosystem
Best RMM Software · 2026
Datto RMM vs 
N-able N-central Datto RMM vs N-able N-central: on our data-weighted scoring, Datto RMM edges ahead (7.7 vs 7.4/10). Datto RMM starts at Custom quote and is best for established MSPs in the Kaseya/Datto ecosystem; N-able N-central starts at Custom quote and is best for growing-to-large MSPs needing scalable RMM with deep automation. Choose Datto RMM for the stronger overall track record; consider N-able N-central if its pricing model or fit matches your environment better. Side-by-side table below.
Affiliate disclosure: Some links may be affiliate or partner links. If you sign up through one, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. This never changes our scores or rankings. Learn more.
N-able N-central
7.4/10
MSP Compared score
- Starting price
- Custom quote
- Reviews
- 4.3/5 (~200 G2 reviews)
- Free trial
- Free trial
- Deployment
- Cloud + on-prem
- Best for
- Growing-to-large MSPs needing scalable RMM with deep automation
Strengths at a glance
Six criteria, each scored 0–10 on the same scale from real review data, public pricing and feature coverage. See our methodology →
| Criterion | Datto RMM | N-able N-central |
|---|---|---|
| Editorial | 7.7 | 7.4 |
| User reviews | 9.0 | 8.6 |
| Adoption | 7.5 | 6.1 |
| Affordability | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| Feature breadth | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| Ease of trial | 6.0 | 6.0 |
Datto RMM vs N-able N-central: head-to-head
| Datto RMM | N-able N-central | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Custom quote | Custom quote |
| Pricing model | per device | quote |
| Free trial / tier | Free trial | Free trial |
| Best for | Established MSPs in the Kaseya/Datto ecosystem | Growing-to-large MSPs needing scalable RMM with deep automation |
| Deployment | Cloud | Cloud + on-prem |
| G2 rating | 4.5/5 (700) | 4.3/5 (200) |
| Capterra rating | — | — |
| Our score | 7.7 | 7.4 |
Choose Datto RMM if…
You need established msps in the kaseya/datto ecosystem.
✓ Pros
- Mature and scalable
- Built-in ransomware detection
- Deep Datto/Kaseya integration
✕ Cons
- Quote/contract pricing
- Kaseya licensing complexity
- UI dated in places
Choose N-able N-central if…
You need growing-to-large msps needing scalable rmm with deep automation.
✓ Pros
- Scales to large fleets
- Strong automation
- Mature ecosystem
✕ Cons
- Complex setup
- Quote pricing
- UI dated
In depth
In Depth
Pricing
Both solutions use quote-based pricing, meaning you won’t find transparent per-unit costs online. Datto RMM operates on a per-device model, while N-able N-central also follows per-device licensing but with more flexibility for larger deployments.
| Aspect | Datto RMM | N-able N-central |
|---|---|---|
| Model | Per-device | Per-device (quote) |
| Free Tier | No | No |
| Free Trial | Yes | Yes |
| Transparency | Quote required | Quote required |
Verdict: Neither excels at pricing transparency. Datto’s per-device model is simpler conceptually, but both require sales conversations. Budget 6–12 weeks for accurate quotes.
Features & Deployment
Datto RMM is cloud-only and emphasizes ransomware detection as a differentiator. Its strength lies in ecosystem integration—particularly if you already use Datto backup or Kaseya PSA. Core features include patch management, automation, and network topology visualization.
N-able N-central offers hybrid deployment (cloud + on-premises) and positions itself around scalability and automation depth. Its automation manager is more mature than Datto’s scripting, and it includes integrated security and remote access out of the box.
| Feature | Datto RMM | N-able N-central |
|---|---|---|
| Deployment | Cloud | Cloud + On-prem |
| Ransomware Detection | Built-in | Integrated security |
| Patch Management | Yes | Yes |
| Automation | Scripting | Automation Manager |
| Remote Access | Via Kaseya | Native |
| Network Topology | Yes | No |
Verdict: Choose Datto if you’re already in the Kaseya/Datto ecosystem and want ransomware-first RMM. Pick N-central if you need on-premises deployment flexibility or advanced automation at scale.
Ratings & Community
G2 Ratings:
- Datto RMM: 4.5/5 (700 reviews)
- N-able N-central: 4.3/5 (200 reviews)
Datto has significantly more community feedback, suggesting stronger adoption among review-writing MSPs. Both are well-regarded but show dated UI concerns in user feedback.
Our Scores:
- Datto RMM: 7.7/10
- N-able N-central: 7.4/10
Verdict
Pick Datto RMM if:
- You’re invested in Kaseya (PSA, security products)
- Ransomware detection is a priority
- You prefer cloud-only simplicity
- You want established, predictable RMM
Pick N-able N-central if:
- You need on-premises deployment options
- Automation depth and customization matter more
- You’re scaling to 1000+ devices
- You want a mature, vendor-agnostic platform
Both are mature, quote-only solutions with aging interfaces. The choice hinges on ecosystem lock-in tolerance and deployment flexibility, not feature gaps. Neither offers significant pricing advantage.
Frequently asked questions
- Datto RMM vs N-able N-central: which is better?
- Datto RMM vs N-able N-central: on our data-weighted scoring, Datto RMM edges ahead (7.7 vs 7.4/10). Datto RMM starts at Custom quote and is best for established MSPs in the Kaseya/Datto ecosystem; N-able N-central starts at Custom quote and is best for growing-to-large MSPs needing scalable RMM with deep automation.
- Is Datto RMM cheaper than N-able N-central?
- Datto RMM starts at Custom quote and N-able N-central starts at Custom quote (see the pricing rows for models and limits).
Data as of September 17, 2026. Sources: datto.com, n-able.com. Figures are pulled from public vendor and security data and refreshed automatically.