HaloPSA
7.9/10
MSP Compared score
- Starting price
- $59/agent/mo
- Reviews
- 4.6/5 (~80 G2 reviews)
- Free trial
- 30 days
- Deployment
- Cloud + on-prem
- Best for
- MSPs wanting a modern, highly configurable PSA with transparent pricing
Best PSA Software · 2026
HaloPSA vs 
Naverisk HaloPSA vs Naverisk: on our data-weighted scoring, HaloPSA edges ahead (7.9 vs 7.7/10). HaloPSA starts at $59/agent/mo and is best for MSPs wanting a modern, highly configurable PSA with transparent pricing; Naverisk starts at $110/mo and is best for small MSPs wanting an all-in-one RMM + service desk + PSA from a single vendor at one flat price. Choose HaloPSA for the stronger overall track record; consider Naverisk if its pricing model or fit matches your environment better. Side-by-side table below.
Affiliate disclosure: Some links may be affiliate or partner links. If you sign up through one, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. This never changes our scores or rankings. Learn more.
Naverisk
7.7/10
MSP Compared score
- Starting price
- $110/mo
- Reviews
- 4.7/5 (~70 G2 reviews)
- Free trial
- Free trial
- Deployment
- Cloud + on-prem
- Best for
- Small MSPs wanting an all-in-one RMM + service desk + PSA from a single vendor at one flat price
Strengths at a glance
Six criteria, each scored 0–10 on the same scale from real review data, public pricing and feature coverage. See our methodology →
| Criterion | HaloPSA | Naverisk |
|---|---|---|
| Editorial | 7.9 | 7.7 |
| User reviews | 9.2 | 9.4 |
| Adoption | 5.1 | 4.9 |
| Affordability | 2.3 | 1.5 |
| Feature breadth | 5.0 | 6.0 |
| Ease of trial | 6.0 | 6.0 |
HaloPSA vs Naverisk: head-to-head
| HaloPSA | Naverisk | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $59/agent/mo | $110/mo |
| Pricing model | per technician | flat |
| Free trial / tier | 30 days | Free trial |
| Best for | MSPs wanting a modern, highly configurable PSA with transparent pricing | Small MSPs wanting an all-in-one RMM + service desk + PSA from a single vendor at one flat price |
| Deployment | Cloud + on-prem | Cloud + on-prem |
| G2 rating | 4.6/5 (80) | 4.7/5 (70) |
| Capterra rating | — | — |
| Our score | 7.9 | 7.7 |
Choose HaloPSA if…
You need msps wanting a modern, highly configurable psa with transparent pricing.
✓ Pros
- Modern UI
- Transparent per-agent pricing
- Very configurable
✕ Cons
- Configurability = setup time
- Smaller ecosystem than ConnectWise
- Per-agent cost
Choose Naverisk if…
You need small msps wanting an all-in-one rmm + service desk + psa from a single vendor at one flat price.
✓ Pros
- All-in-one RMM+ITSM+PSA single vendor
- Transparent $110/mo entry
- Strong review ratings
✕ Cons
- PSA depth lighter than dedicated PSAs
- Per-device scale pricing quoted
- Smaller North American community
In depth
Pricing
| Aspect | HaloPSA | Naverisk |
|---|---|---|
| Model | Per-technician/agent | Flat monthly + per-device |
| Entry Price | $59/agent/mo (annual) | $110/mo (monthly) |
| Best For | Growing MSPs scaling headcount | Small MSPs with fixed device base |
| Cost Trajectory | Linear with team size | Scales with managed devices |
HaloPSA’s per-agent model rewards lean teams but compounds quickly as you hire. Naverisk’s flat entry is deceptive—the real cost emerges once you factor in device count, but it’s simpler for MSPs managing 50–200 endpoints without large technical teams.
Features & Deployment
Both run cloud + on-prem. The critical difference: scope.
HaloPSA is a dedicated PSA:
- Ticketing, billing, contracts, SLAs, project management
- Deep configurability for complex workflows
- Modern UI, but setup requires effort
Naverisk is an all-in-one stack:
- RMM + monitoring + service desk + PSA + billing + automation
- Single vendor, single console, unified data
- 24/7 support included
- PSA features lighter than HaloPSA’s
Verdict on features: Choose HaloPSA if you already have RMM/monitoring elsewhere or need advanced PSA workflows. Choose Naverisk if you want to replace 3–4 tools with one platform.
Ratings & User Sentiment
| Source | HaloPSA | Naverisk |
|---|---|---|
| G2 Score | 4.6/5 (80 reviews) | 4.7/5 (70 reviews) |
| Our Score | 7.9 | 7.7 |
Naverisk edges HaloPSA on G2, likely because users appreciate the all-in-one value. HaloPSA’s reviews emphasize UI/UX and flexibility. Naverisk’s praise consistency suggests it delivers on the “single platform” promise—though PSA depth criticisms appear in longer reviews.
Verdict
- HaloPSA: Better if you need a modern, highly customizable PSA or already have RMM covered. Pay per tech, expect setup time.
- Naverisk: Better for small MSPs tired of juggling vendors. One flat entry price, one dashboard, acceptable PSA feature set. Smaller community in North America is a trade-off.
Bottom line: HaloPSA = flexibility + modern tooling; Naverisk = simplicity + integration. Pick based on your tech stack maturity and team size, not just price.
Frequently asked questions
- HaloPSA vs Naverisk: which is better?
- HaloPSA vs Naverisk: on our data-weighted scoring, HaloPSA edges ahead (7.9 vs 7.7/10). HaloPSA starts at $59/agent/mo and is best for MSPs wanting a modern, highly configurable PSA with transparent pricing; Naverisk starts at $110/mo and is best for small MSPs wanting an all-in-one RMM + service desk + PSA from a single vendor at one flat price.
- Is HaloPSA cheaper than Naverisk?
- HaloPSA starts at $59/agent/mo and Naverisk starts at $110/mo (see the pricing rows for models and limits).
Data as of September 17, 2026. Sources: halopsa.com, naverisk.com. Figures are pulled from public vendor and security data and refreshed automatically.