HaloPSA
7.9/10
MSP Compared score
- Starting price
- $59/agent/mo
- Reviews
- 4.6/5 (~80 G2 reviews)
- Free trial
- 30 days
- Deployment
- Cloud + on-prem
- Best for
- MSPs wanting a modern, highly configurable PSA with transparent pricing
Best PSA Software · 2026
HaloPSA vs 
SuperOps HaloPSA vs SuperOps: on our data-weighted scoring, HaloPSA edges ahead (7.9 vs 7.8/10). HaloPSA starts at $59/agent/mo and is best for MSPs wanting a modern, highly configurable PSA with transparent pricing; SuperOps starts at $79/tech/mo and is best for modern MSPs wanting a clean unified RMM+PSA with AI built in. Choose HaloPSA for the stronger overall track record; consider SuperOps if its pricing model or fit matches your environment better. Side-by-side table below.
Affiliate disclosure: Some links may be affiliate or partner links. If you sign up through one, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. This never changes our scores or rankings. Learn more.
SuperOps
7.8/10
MSP Compared score
- Starting price
- $79/tech/mo
- Reviews
- 4.6/5 (~150 G2 reviews)
- Free trial
- 14 days
- Deployment
- Cloud
- Best for
- Modern MSPs wanting a clean unified RMM+PSA with AI built in
Strengths at a glance
Six criteria, each scored 0–10 on the same scale from real review data, public pricing and feature coverage. See our methodology →
| Criterion | HaloPSA | SuperOps |
|---|---|---|
| Editorial | 7.9 | 7.8 |
| User reviews | 9.2 | 9.2 |
| Adoption | 5.1 | 5.8 |
| Affordability | 2.3 | 1.8 |
| Feature breadth | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| Ease of trial | 6.0 | 6.0 |
HaloPSA vs SuperOps: head-to-head
| HaloPSA | SuperOps | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $59/agent/mo | $79/tech/mo |
| Pricing model | per technician | per technician |
| Free trial / tier | 30 days | 14 days |
| Best for | MSPs wanting a modern, highly configurable PSA with transparent pricing | Modern MSPs wanting a clean unified RMM+PSA with AI built in |
| Deployment | Cloud + on-prem | Cloud |
| G2 rating | 4.6/5 (80) | 4.6/5 (150) |
| Capterra rating | — | — |
| Our score | 7.9 | 7.8 |
Choose HaloPSA if…
You need msps wanting a modern, highly configurable psa with transparent pricing.
✓ Pros
- Modern UI
- Transparent per-agent pricing
- Very configurable
✕ Cons
- Configurability = setup time
- Smaller ecosystem than ConnectWise
- Per-agent cost
Choose SuperOps if…
You need modern msps wanting a clean unified rmm+psa with ai built in.
✓ Pros
- Modern UX
- AI features
- Good value for new MSPs
✕ Cons
- Younger ecosystem
- Fewer integrations than incumbents
- Module pricing
In depth
In Depth
Pricing
Both HaloPSA and SuperOps use per-technician annual billing, but with key differences:
| Aspect | HaloPSA | SuperOps |
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | $59/tech/mo | $79/tech/mo |
| Billing Model | Per-agent, all-inclusive | Per-tech, modular |
| Free Trial | 30 days | 14 days |
| Volume Discounts | Yes | Not specified |
| Best Value For | Budget-conscious MSPs | All-in-one seekers |
HaloPSA’s $59 entry point is $20/month cheaper and includes all features in one tier—no hidden upsells. SuperOps charges more but bundles RMM+PSA, which could eliminate separate tool costs if you’re not already invested elsewhere.
Features & Deployment
HaloPSA spans cloud and on-prem deployments, ideal for organizations with data residency or legacy requirements. Its feature set is PSA-focused: ticketing, billing, contracts, SLAs, project management, and notably deep configurability. This flexibility is both a strength and a friction point—setup demands time.
SuperOps is cloud-only and positions itself as a unified RMM+PSA platform with AI baked in. Beyond standard PSA/RMM, it offers patch management and asset management in a single interface. The modern UX and AI-assisted operations appeal to tech-forward MSPs, but fewer integrations limit extensibility compared to established competitors.
Ratings & Community
Both earn identical G2 scores of 4.6/5, but SuperOps has built twice the review volume (150 vs. 80), suggesting broader market traction among newer deployments. HaloPSA’s smaller but high-confidence user base reflects a loyal niche of MSPs valuing configurability and simplicity.
Verdict
Choose HaloPSA if: You want a lean, transparent PSA without RMM, value configurability, or need on-prem options. The 30-day trial and lower entry cost reduce risk.
Choose SuperOps if: You’re a newer or growing MSP wanting one platform for RMM and PSA, appreciate AI-driven workflows, and don’t already have deep RMM commitments elsewhere. The unified model cuts operational overhead.
HaloPSA edges ahead on cost and flexibility; SuperOps wins on all-in-one convenience. Both score similarly, so pick based on your stack’s architecture and team preference for configuration vs. simplicity.
Frequently asked questions
- HaloPSA vs SuperOps: which is better?
- HaloPSA vs SuperOps: on our data-weighted scoring, HaloPSA edges ahead (7.9 vs 7.8/10). HaloPSA starts at $59/agent/mo and is best for MSPs wanting a modern, highly configurable PSA with transparent pricing; SuperOps starts at $79/tech/mo and is best for modern MSPs wanting a clean unified RMM+PSA with AI built in.
- Is HaloPSA cheaper than SuperOps?
- HaloPSA starts at $59/agent/mo and SuperOps starts at $79/tech/mo (see the pricing rows for models and limits).
Data as of September 17, 2026. Sources: halopsa.com, superops.com. Figures are pulled from public vendor and security data and refreshed automatically.