NinjaOne
9.1/10
MSP Compared score
- Starting price
- Custom quote
- Reviews
- 4.7/5 (~1.6k G2 reviews)
- Free trial
- 14 days
- Deployment
- Cloud
- Best for
- MSPs and IT teams wanting a modern, fast, all-in-one RMM
Best RMM Software · 2026
NinjaOne vs 
PDQ Connect NinjaOne vs PDQ Connect: on our data-weighted scoring, NinjaOne edges ahead (8.5 vs 7.5/10). NinjaOne starts at Custom quote and is best for msps and it teams wanting a modern, fast, all-in-one rmm; PDQ Connect starts at Custom quote and is best for teams that want pdq's deployment power for remote/cloud-managed devices. Choose NinjaOne for the stronger overall track record; consider PDQ Connect if its pricing model or fit matches your environment better. Side-by-side table below.
PDQ Connect
8.0/10
MSP Compared score
- Starting price
- Custom quote
- Reviews
- 4.6/5 (~40 G2 reviews)
- Free trial
- 14 days
- Deployment
- Cloud
- Best for
- Teams that want PDQ's deployment power for remote/cloud-managed devices
Affiliate links — vendors may pay us a commission. It never affects our data-driven ranking.
Strengths at a glance
Six criteria, each scored 0–10 on the same scale from real review data, public pricing and feature coverage. See our methodology →
| Criterion | NinjaOne | PDQ Connect |
|---|---|---|
| Editorial | 8.5 | 7.5 |
| User reviews | 9.4 | 9.2 |
| Adoption | 8.5 | 4.3 |
| Affordability | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| Feature breadth | 6.0 | 4.0 |
| Ease of trial | 6.0 | 6.0 |
NinjaOne vs PDQ Connect: head-to-head
| NinjaOne | PDQ Connect | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Custom quote | Custom quote |
| Pricing model | per device | per device |
| Free trial / tier | 14 days | 14 days |
| Best for | MSPs and IT teams wanting a modern, fast, all-in-one RMM | Teams that want PDQ's deployment power for remote/cloud-managed devices |
| Deployment | Cloud | Cloud |
| G2 rating | 4.7/5 (1600) | 4.6/5 (40) |
| Capterra rating | 4.8/5 (230) | — |
| Our score | 8.5 | 7.5 |
Choose NinjaOne if…
You need msps and it teams wanting a modern, fast, all-in-one rmm.
Pros
- Modern fast UI
- Excellent patching built in
- Top-rated support
Cons
- No public pricing (quote only)
- Per-device cost
- Some advanced features cost extra
Choose PDQ Connect if…
You need teams that want pdq's deployment power for remote/cloud-managed devices.
Pros
- Cloud version of PDQ's strong deployment engine
- Manages remote devices
- Simple agent
Cons
- Newer than Deploy
- Windows-focused
- Per-device pricing
In depth
Pricing: NinjaOne vs PDQ Connect
NinjaOne bills on a per device model from Custom quote (14 days trial), while PDQ Connect uses a per device model from Custom quote (14 days trial). Because the models differ, the cheaper option flips depending on your fleet size — model both at your seat/endpoint count.
Features & deployment
NinjaOne ships 6 headline capabilities (RMM + patch management, Endpoint backup, Remote access, Software deployment) and deploys Cloud. PDQ Connect ships 4 (Agent-based cloud management, Patch + custom deployment, Works off-network, Inventory + reporting), deploying Cloud.
Ratings & verdict
NinjaOne holds 4.7/5 (~1.6k G2 reviews); PDQ Connect holds 4.6/5 (~40 G2 reviews). On our data-weighted score, NinjaOne edges ahead (8.5 vs 7.5/10). Pick PDQ Connect instead when teams that want pdq’s deployment power for remote/cloud-managed devices. See NinjaOne alternatives or PDQ Connect alternatives.
Frequently asked questions
- NinjaOne vs PDQ Connect: which is better?
- NinjaOne vs PDQ Connect: on our data-weighted scoring, NinjaOne edges ahead (8.5 vs 7.5/10). NinjaOne starts at Custom quote and is best for msps and it teams wanting a modern, fast, all-in-one rmm; PDQ Connect starts at Custom quote and is best for teams that want pdq's deployment power for remote/cloud-managed devices.
- Is NinjaOne cheaper than PDQ Connect?
- NinjaOne starts at Custom quote and PDQ Connect starts at Custom quote (see the pricing rows for models and limits).
Data as of June 16, 2026. Sources: ninjaone.com, pdq.com. Figures are pulled from public vendor and security data and refreshed automatically.