Automox
8.3/10
MSP Compared score
- Starting price
- $3/endpoint/mo
- Reviews
- 4.5/5 (~90 G2 reviews)
- Free trial
- 14 days
- Deployment
- Cloud
- Best for
- Cloud-native cross-OS patch + config automation for lean IT teams
Best Patch Management Software · 2026
Automox vs 
NinjaOne Automox vs NinjaOne: on our data-weighted scoring, NinjaOne edges ahead (8.5 vs 7.7/10). Automox starts at $3/endpoint/mo and is best for cloud-native cross-os patch + config automation for lean it teams; NinjaOne starts at Custom quote and is best for msps and it teams wanting a modern, fast, all-in-one rmm. Choose NinjaOne for the stronger overall track record; consider Automox if its pricing model or fit matches your environment better. Side-by-side table below.
NinjaOne
9.1/10
MSP Compared score
- Starting price
- Custom quote
- Reviews
- 4.7/5 (~1.6k G2 reviews)
- Free trial
- 14 days
- Deployment
- Cloud
- Best for
- MSPs and IT teams wanting a modern, fast, all-in-one RMM
Affiliate links — vendors may pay us a commission. It never affects our data-driven ranking.
Strengths at a glance
Six criteria, each scored 0–10 on the same scale from real review data, public pricing and feature coverage. See our methodology →
| Criterion | Automox | NinjaOne |
|---|---|---|
| Editorial | 7.7 | 8.5 |
| User reviews | 9.0 | 9.4 |
| Adoption | 5.2 | 8.5 |
| Affordability | 7.8 | 5.0 |
| Feature breadth | 5.0 | 6.0 |
| Ease of trial | 6.0 | 6.0 |
Automox vs NinjaOne: head-to-head
| Automox | NinjaOne | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $3/endpoint/mo | Custom quote |
| Pricing model | per endpoint | per device |
| Free trial / tier | 14 days | 14 days |
| Best for | Cloud-native cross-OS patch + config automation for lean IT teams | MSPs and IT teams wanting a modern, fast, all-in-one RMM |
| Deployment | Cloud | Cloud |
| G2 rating | 4.5/5 (90) | 4.7/5 (1600) |
| Capterra rating | — | 4.8/5 (230) |
| Our score | 7.7 | 8.5 |
Choose Automox if…
You need cloud-native cross-os patch + config automation for lean it teams.
Pros
- True cross-OS parity
- No on-prem infrastructure
- Flexible automation via Worklets
Cons
- No free tier
- Per-endpoint cost adds up
- Reporting depth trails enterprise suites
Choose NinjaOne if…
You need msps and it teams wanting a modern, fast, all-in-one rmm.
Pros
- Modern fast UI
- Excellent patching built in
- Top-rated support
Cons
- No public pricing (quote only)
- Per-device cost
- Some advanced features cost extra
In depth
Pricing: NinjaOne vs Automox
NinjaOne bills on a per device model from Custom quote (14 days trial), while Automox uses a per endpoint model from $3/endpoint/mo (14 days trial). Because the models differ, the cheaper option flips depending on your fleet size — model both at your seat/endpoint count.
Features & deployment
NinjaOne ships 6 headline capabilities (RMM + patch management, Endpoint backup, Remote access, Software deployment) and deploys Cloud. Automox ships 5 (Cross-platform patching (Windows/macOS/Linux), Third-party app patching, Worklets automation, Cloud-native (no VPN/agents infra)), deploying Cloud.
Ratings & verdict
NinjaOne holds 4.7/5 (~1.6k G2 reviews); Automox holds 4.5/5 (~90 G2 reviews). On our data-weighted score, NinjaOne edges ahead (8.5 vs 7.7/10). Pick Automox instead when cloud-native cross-os patch + config automation for lean it teams. See NinjaOne alternatives or Automox alternatives.
Frequently asked questions
- Automox vs NinjaOne: which is better?
- Automox vs NinjaOne: on our data-weighted scoring, NinjaOne edges ahead (8.5 vs 7.7/10). Automox starts at $3/endpoint/mo and is best for cloud-native cross-os patch + config automation for lean it teams; NinjaOne starts at Custom quote and is best for msps and it teams wanting a modern, fast, all-in-one rmm.
- Is Automox cheaper than NinjaOne?
- Automox starts at $3/endpoint/mo and NinjaOne starts at Custom quote (see the pricing rows for models and limits).
Data as of June 16, 2026. Sources: automox.com, ninjaone.com. Figures are pulled from public vendor and security data and refreshed automatically.