Automox
7.7/10
MSP Compared score
- Starting price
- $3/endpoint/mo
- Reviews
- 4.5/5 (~90 G2 reviews)
- Free trial
- 14 days
- Deployment
- Cloud
- Best for
- Cloud-native cross-OS patch + config automation for lean IT teams
Best Patch Management Software · 2026
Automox vs 
NinjaOne Automox vs NinjaOne: on our data-weighted scoring, NinjaOne edges ahead (8.5 vs 7.7/10). Automox starts at $3/endpoint/mo and is best for cloud-native cross-OS patch + config automation for lean IT teams; NinjaOne starts at Custom quote and is best for MSPs and IT teams wanting a modern, fast, all-in-one RMM. Choose NinjaOne for the stronger overall track record; consider Automox if its pricing model or fit matches your environment better. Side-by-side table below.
Affiliate disclosure: Some links may be affiliate or partner links. If you sign up through one, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. This never changes our scores or rankings. Learn more.
NinjaOne
8.5/10
MSP Compared score
- Starting price
- Custom quote
- Reviews
- 4.7/5 (~1.6k G2 reviews)
- Free trial
- 14 days
- Deployment
- Cloud
- Best for
- MSPs and IT teams wanting a modern, fast, all-in-one RMM
Strengths at a glance
Six criteria, each scored 0–10 on the same scale from real review data, public pricing and feature coverage. See our methodology →
| Criterion | Automox | NinjaOne |
|---|---|---|
| Editorial | 7.7 | 8.5 |
| User reviews | 9.0 | 9.4 |
| Adoption | 5.2 | 8.5 |
| Affordability | 7.6 | 5.0 |
| Feature breadth | 5.0 | 6.0 |
| Ease of trial | 6.0 | 6.0 |
Automox vs NinjaOne: head-to-head
| Automox | NinjaOne | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $3/endpoint/mo | Custom quote |
| Pricing model | per endpoint | per device |
| Free trial / tier | 14 days | 14 days |
| Best for | Cloud-native cross-OS patch + config automation for lean IT teams | MSPs and IT teams wanting a modern, fast, all-in-one RMM |
| Deployment | Cloud | Cloud |
| G2 rating | 4.5/5 (90) | 4.7/5 (1600) |
| Capterra rating | — | 4.8/5 (230) |
| Our score | 7.7 | 8.5 |
Choose Automox if…
You need cloud-native cross-os patch + config automation for lean it teams.
✓ Pros
- True cross-OS parity
- No on-prem infrastructure
- Flexible automation via Worklets
✕ Cons
- No free tier
- Per-endpoint cost adds up
- Reporting depth trails enterprise suites
Choose NinjaOne if…
You need msps and it teams wanting a modern, fast, all-in-one rmm.
✓ Pros
- Modern fast UI
- Excellent patching built in
- Top-rated support
✕ Cons
- No public pricing (quote only)
- Per-device cost
- Some advanced features cost extra
In depth
Pricing
| Aspect | NinjaOne | Automox |
|---|---|---|
| Model | Per-device (annual) | Per-endpoint (annual) |
| Starting Price | ~$3–5/device (quote-based) | $3/endpoint (Manage tier) |
| Public Pricing | No | Yes |
| Free Tier | No | No |
| Free Trial | 14 days | 14 days |
NinjaOne withholds public pricing, requiring quotes; typical MSP rates hover $3–5 per device annually. Automox publishes transparent pricing starting at $3/endpoint for patching and basic management, with a $5/endpoint Secure tier adding vulnerability remediation. For lean teams or those wanting upfront cost visibility, Automox wins. NinjaOne’s opacity frustrates budget planning but may yield negotiated discounts at scale.
Features & Deployment
Both are cloud-deployed, but serve different angles:
NinjaOne bundles RMM, patching, endpoint backup, remote access, software deployment, asset management, and ticketing into one platform. It’s a full-stack suite aiming to replace multiple point solutions.
Automox focuses on patching and configuration automation with cloud-native architecture. Strengths include true Windows/macOS/Linux parity and flexible Worklets for custom automation. It deliberately avoids on-premises infrastructure (no VPN, lightweight agents), making it friction-free for distributed teams. Reporting depth, however, lags enterprise suites.
Verdict: NinjaOne suits teams wanting one platform; Automox excels if patching and agility are your north star.
Ratings & Our Take
| Source | NinjaOne | Automox |
|---|---|---|
| G2 | 4.7★ (1,600 reviews) | 4.5★ (90 reviews) |
| Capterra | 4.8★ (230 reviews) | — |
| Our Score | 8.5/10 | 7.7/10 |
NinjaOne dominates review volume and consistency—4.7–4.8 across platforms, backed by extensive user feedback. Its modern UI and patch execution earn particular praise. Automox’s 4.5 on G2 is respectable but reflects a smaller, more niche user base. Neither has negative outliers.
Verdict
Choose NinjaOne if you need a unified RMM suite with best-in-class patching, top-tier support, and don’t mind opaque pricing or per-device cost overhead.
Choose Automox if you prioritize cloud-native simplicity, cross-OS parity, transparent pricing, and want to keep patching and automation lean without full-stack RMM baggage.
NinjaOne is the category leader; Automox is the nimbler specialist. For MSPs, NinjaOne’s breadth wins. For IT teams running hybrid cloud fleets, Automox’s architecture shines.
Frequently asked questions
- Automox vs NinjaOne: which is better?
- Automox vs NinjaOne: on our data-weighted scoring, NinjaOne edges ahead (8.5 vs 7.7/10). Automox starts at $3/endpoint/mo and is best for cloud-native cross-OS patch + config automation for lean IT teams; NinjaOne starts at Custom quote and is best for MSPs and IT teams wanting a modern, fast, all-in-one RMM.
- Is Automox cheaper than NinjaOne?
- Automox starts at $3/endpoint/mo and NinjaOne starts at Custom quote (see the pricing rows for models and limits).
Data as of September 17, 2026. Sources: automox.com, ninjaone.com. Figures are pulled from public vendor and security data and refreshed automatically.