Jira Service Management
- Starting price
- $19.04/agent/mo
- Reviews
- 4.2/5 (~800 G2 reviews)
- Free trial
- Free tier + free trial
- Deployment
- Cloud + data center
- Best for
- Dev-adjacent IT teams already using Atlassian
Best ITSM / Help Desk Ticketing Software · 2026
Jira Service Management vs Zammad: on our data-weighted scoring, Zammad edges ahead (8.3 vs 7.9/10). Jira Service Management starts at $19.04/agent/mo and is best for dev-adjacent it teams already using atlassian; Zammad starts at EUR 7/agent/mo and is best for teams wanting a modern, open-source help desk with an optional managed cloud. Choose Zammad for the stronger overall track record; consider Jira Service Management if its pricing model or fit matches your environment better. Side-by-side table below.
Affiliate links — vendors may pay us a commission. It never affects our data-driven ranking.
Six criteria, each scored 0–10 on the same scale from real review data, public pricing and feature coverage. See our methodology →
| Criterion | Jira Service Management | Zammad |
|---|---|---|
| Editorial | 7.9 | 8.3 |
| User reviews | 8.4 | 9.0 |
| Adoption | 7.7 | 2.8 |
| Affordability | 9.5 | 9.5 |
| Feature breadth | 5.0 | 9.0 |
| Ease of trial | 10.0 | 10.0 |
| Jira Service Management | Zammad | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $19.04/agent/mo | EUR 7/agent/mo |
| Pricing model | per agent | per user |
| Free trial / tier | Free tier + free trial | Free tier + free trial |
| Best for | Dev-adjacent IT teams already using Atlassian | Teams wanting a modern, open-source help desk with an optional managed cloud |
| Deployment | Cloud + data center | Cloud + self-host |
| G2 rating | 4.2/5 (800) | 4.5/5 (10) |
| Capterra rating | — | — |
| Our score | 7.9 | 8.3 |
You need dev-adjacent it teams already using atlassian.
You need teams wanting a modern, open-source help desk with an optional managed cloud.
Zammad bills on a per user model from EUR 7/agent/mo (free tier available), while Jira Service Management uses a per agent model from $19.04/agent/mo (free tier available). Because the models differ, the cheaper option flips depending on your fleet size — model both at your seat/endpoint count.
Zammad ships 9 headline capabilities (Open-source self-hosted core, Multi-channel (email, chat, Telegram) and deploys Cloud + self-host. Jira Service Management ships 5 (ITSM + ITIL, Incident/change/problem, Dev tool integration, Automation), deploying Cloud + data center.
Zammad holds 4.5/5 (~10 G2 reviews); Jira Service Management holds 4.2/5 (~800 G2 reviews). On our data-weighted score, Zammad edges ahead (8.3 vs 7.9/10). Pick Jira Service Management instead when dev-adjacent it teams already using atlassian. See Zammad alternatives or Jira Service Management alternatives.